Water, Air and Soil Pollution: Focus

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 5–18 | Cite as

Use of Natural 35S to Trace Sulphate Cycling in Small Lakes, Flattops Wilderness Area, Colorado, U.S.A.

  • Robert L. Michel
  • John T. Turk
  • Donald H. Campbell
  • M. A. Mast
Article

Abstract

Measurements of the cosmogenically-produced 35S, a radioisotope of sulphur (t1/2 = 87 days), are reported for the Ned Wilson Lake watershed in Colorado. The watershed contains two small lakes and a flowing spring presumed to be representative of local ground water. The watershed is located in the Flattops Wilderness Area and the waters in the system have low alkalinity, making them sensitive to increases in acid and sulphate deposition. Time series of 35S measurements were made during the summers of 1995 and 1996 (July–September) at all three sites. The system is dominated by melting snow and an initial concentration of 16–20 mBq L-1 was estimated for snowmelt based on a series of snow samples collected in the Rocky Mountains. The two lakes had large initial 35S concentrations in July, indicating that a large fraction of the lake water and sulphate was introduced by meltwater from that year's snowpack. In 1995 and 1996, 35S concentrations decreased more rapidly than could be accounted for by decay, indicating that other processes were affecting 35S concentrations. The most likely explanation is that exchange with sediments or the biota was removing 35S from the lake and replacing it with older sulphate devoid of 35S. In September of 1995 and 1996, 35S concentrations increased, suggesting that atmospheric deposition is important in the sulphate flux of these lakes in late summer. Sulphur-35 concentrations in the spring water were highly variable but never higher than 3.6 mBq L-1 and averaged 2 mBq L-1. Using a simple mixing model, it was estimated that 75% of the spring water was derived from precipitation of previous years.

acid deposition hydrology mountain lakes radioactivity sulphur 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Campbell, D. C., Turk, J. T. and Spahr, N. W.: 1991, 'Response of Ned Wilson Lake Watershed, Colorado, to changes in atmospheric deposition of sulfate', Water Resour. Res. 27, 2047–2060.Google Scholar
  2. Cooper, L. W., Olsen, C. R., Solomon, D. K., Larsen, L. I., Cook, R. B. and Grebmeier, J. M.: 1991, 'Stable isotopes of oxygen and natural and fallout radionuclides used for tracing runoff during snowmelt in an Arctic watershed', Water Resour. Res. 27, 2171–2180.Google Scholar
  3. Delleur, J. W.: 1989, 'Atmospheric Deposition', Proceedings of a Symposium of the Third Scientific Assembly of the International Association of Hydrologic Sciences, IAHS publication 179, Baltimore, Maryland, April 1989, 288 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Krouse, H. R. and Mayer, B.: 2000, 'Sulphur and Oxygen Isotopes in Sulphate', P. Cook and A. L. Herczeg (eds), Environmental Tracers in Subsurface Hydrology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp. 195–231.Google Scholar
  5. Lal, D. and Peters, B.: 1966, Cosmic Ray Produced Radioactivity on the Earth, Handbuch der Physik, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 550–612.Google Scholar
  6. Mast, M. A., Turk, J. T., Ingersoll, G. I. and Clow, D. W.: 2001, 'Use of stable sulfur isotopes to identify sources of sulfate in the Rocky Mountain snowpacks',Atmosph. Environ. (in press).Google Scholar
  7. Michel, R. L. and Turk, J. T.: 1996, 'Use of 35S to Study Rates of Sulphur Migration in the Flat Tops Wilderness Area, Colorado', Proceedings of a Symposium on Isotopes in Water Resources Research, Vol. 1, Vienna, Austria, March 1995, pp. 293–301.Google Scholar
  8. Michel, R. L., Campbell, D., Clow, D. and Turk, J. T.: 2000, 'Timescales for migration of atmospherically derived sulphate through an alpine/subalpine watershed, Loch Vale, Colorado, Water Resour. Res. 36, 27–36.Google Scholar
  9. Spahr, N. E. and Turk, J. T.: 1985, Estimation of Evaporation from Ned Wilson Lake, Flattops Wilderness Area, Colorado, U.S. Geol. Surv. Water Resour. Invest. Rep 85-4244, 13 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Sueker, J. K., Turk, J. T. and Michel, R. L.: 1999, 'Use of cosmogenic 35S for comparing ages of water from three alpine-subalpine basins in the Colorado Front Range', Geomorphology 27, 61–74.Google Scholar
  11. Tanaka, K. and Turekian, K. K.: 1995, 'Determinations of the dry deposition of SO2 using cosmogenic 35S and 7Be measurements', J. Geophys. Res. 100, 2841–2848.Google Scholar
  12. Turk, J. T. and Adams, D. B.: 1983, 'Sensitivity to acidification of lakes in the Flat Tops Wilderness Area, Colorado', Water Resour. Res. 19, 346–350.Google Scholar
  13. Turk, J. T. and Spahr, N. E.: 1991, 'Rocky Mountains', in D. Charles (ed.), Acidic Deposition in Aquatic Ecosystems: Regional Case Studies, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 471–501.Google Scholar
  14. Turk, J. T., Campbell, D. H., Ingersoll, G. P. and Clow, D. W.: 1992, Initial Findings of Synoptic Snowpack Sampling in the Colorado Rocky Mountains, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 92-645, 6 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Webb, J. H., Deviney, F. A., Cosby, B. J., Bulger, A. J. and Galloway, J. N.: 2000, 'Changes in the acid-base status of streams in Shenandoah National Park and the mountains of Virginia', Transactions of the American Geophysics Union 81, S258–S259.Google Scholar
  16. Wieder, R. K., Novak, M. and Cerny, J.: 1998, Biogeochemical Investigations at the Watershed, Landscape, and the Regional Scales, Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, 505 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert L. Michel
    • 1
  • John T. Turk
    • 2
  • Donald H. Campbell
    • 2
  • M. A. Mast
    • 2
  1. 1.U.S. Geological SurveyMenlo ParkU.S.A.
  2. 2.U.S. Geological Survey, Denver Federal CenterDenverU.S.A

Personalised recommendations