International Journal of Fracture

, Volume 116, Issue 2, pp 141–160 | Cite as

Constraint Loss under Dynamic Loading in Rate Independent Plastic Solids

  • K.R. Jayadevan
  • R. Narasimhan
  • T.S. Ramamurthy
  • B. Dattaguru
Article

Abstract

The objectives of this paper are to examine the loss of crack tip constraint in dynamically loaded fracture specimens and to assess whether it can lead to enhancement in the fracture toughness at high loading rates which has been observed in several experimental studies. To this end, 2-D plane strain finite element analyses of single edge notched (tension) specimen and three point bend specimen subjected to time varying loads are performed. The material is assumed to obey the small strain J2 flow theory of plasticity with rate independent behaviour. The results demonstrate that a valid JQ field exists under dynamic loading irrespective of the crack length and specimen geometry. Further, the constraint parameter Q becomes strongly negative at high loading rates, particularly in deeply cracked specimens. The variation of dynamic fracture toughness Kdc with stress intensity rate K for cleavage cracking is predicted using a simple critical stress criterion. It is found that inertia-driven constraint loss can substantially enhance Kdc for \(\dot K > 10^5 { MPa}\sqrt {m} {/s}\).

rate independent plastic solids constraint loss dynamic loading finite elements cleavage fracture dynamic fracture toughness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Al-Ani, A.M. and Hancock, J.W. (1991). J-dominance of short cracks in tension and bending. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 39, 23–43.Google Scholar
  2. Basu, S. and Narasimhan, R. (2000). A numerical investigation of loss of crack tip constraint in a dynamically loaded ductile specimen. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 48, 1967–1985.Google Scholar
  3. Bathe, K.J. (1997). Finite element procedures, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  4. Belytschko, T. (1983). An overview of semidiscretization and time integration procedures. In Computational Methods for Transient analysis. (Edited by Belytschko, T., Hughes, T.J.R.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1–65.Google Scholar
  5. Betegón, C. and Hancock, J.W. (1991). Two-parameter characterization of elastic-plastic crack-tip fields. Transactions of the ASME, Journal of Applied Mechanics 58, 104–110.Google Scholar
  6. Betegón, C., Belzunce, F.J. and Rodriguez, C. (1996). A two parameter fracture criterion for high strength low carbon steel. Acta Materialia 44, 1055–1061.Google Scholar
  7. Dally, J.W. and Barker, D.B. (1988). Dynamic measurements of initiation toughness at high loading rates. Experimental Mechanics 28, 298–303.Google Scholar
  8. Dodds, Jr. R.H., Shih, C.F. and Anderson, T.L. (1993). Continuum and micromechanics treatment of constraint in fracture. International Journal of Fracture 64, 101–133.Google Scholar
  9. Hughes, T.J.R. (1980). Generalization of selective integration procedures to anisotropic and non-linear media. International Journal of Numerical Methods in Engineering 15, 1413-1418.Google Scholar
  10. Hutchinson, J.W. (1968). Singular behaviour at the end of a tensile crack in a hardening material. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 16, 13–31.Google Scholar
  11. Jayadevan, K.R. (2001). Numerical studies on the role of T-stress in dynamic fracture. Ph.D. thesis (submitted), Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore-560012, India.Google Scholar
  12. Jayadevan, K.R., Narasimhan, R., Ramamurthy, T.S. and Dattaguru, B. (2001). A numerical study of T-stress in dynamically loaded fracture specimens. International Journal of Solids and Structures 38, 4987–5005.Google Scholar
  13. Kalthoff, J.F. (1986). Fracture behaviour under high rates of loading. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 23, 289–298.Google Scholar
  14. Kanninen, M.F. and O'Donoghue, P.E. (1995). Research challenges arising from current and potential applications of dynamic fracture mechanics to the integrity of engineering structures. International Journal of Solids and Structures 32, 2423–2445.Google Scholar
  15. Koppenhoefer, K.C. and Dodds, R.H. (1996). Constraint effects on fracture toughness of impact-loaded, precracked Charpy specimens. Nuclear Engineering and Design 162, 145–158.Google Scholar
  16. Liu, C., Knauss, W.G. and Rosakis, A.J. (1998). Loading rates and the dynamic initiation toughness in brittle solids. International Journal of Fracture 90, 103–118.Google Scholar
  17. Nakamura, T., Shih, C.F. and Freund, L.B. (1986). Analysis of a dynamically loaded three-point-bend ductile fracture specimen. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 25, 323–339.Google Scholar
  18. O'Dowd, N.P. and Shih, C.F. (1991). Family of crack-tip fields characterized by a triaxiality parameter-I. Structure of fields. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 39, 989–1015.Google Scholar
  19. O'Dowd, N.P. and Shih, C.F. (1992). Family of crack-tip fields characterized by a triaxiality parameter-II. Fracture applications. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 40, 939–963.Google Scholar
  20. O'Dowd, N.P. and Shih, C.F. (1994). Two-parameter fracture mechanics: Theory and applications. ASTM STP 1207, 21–47.Google Scholar
  21. Owen, D.M., Zhuang, S., Rosakis, A.J. and Ravichandran, G. (1998a). Experimental determination of dynamic crack initiation and propagation fracture toughness in thin aluminum sheets. International Journal of Fracture 90, 153–174.Google Scholar
  22. Owen, D.M., Rosakis, A.J. and Johnson, W.L. (1998b) Dynamic failure mechanisms in beryllium-bearing bulk metallic glasses. SM Report 98-22, GALCIT, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, USA.Google Scholar
  23. Ravi-Chandar, K. and Knauss, W.G. (1984). An experimental investigation into dynamic fracture: I. crack initiation and arrest. International Journal of Fracture 25, 247–262.Google Scholar
  24. Rice, J.R. and Rosengren, G.F. (1968). Plane strain deformation near a crack tip in a power-law hardening material. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 16, 1–12.Google Scholar
  25. Ritchie, R.O., Knott, J.F. and Rice, J.R. (1973). On the relationship between critical tensile stress and fracture toughness in mild steel. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 21, 395–410.Google Scholar
  26. Roy, Y.A. Narasimhan, R. and Arora, P.R. (1999). An experimental investigation of constraint effects on mixed mode fracture initiation in a ductile aluminium alloy. Acta Materialia 47, 1587–1596.Google Scholar
  27. Roy, Y.A. and Narasimhan, R. (1999). Constraint effects on ductile fracture processes near a notch tip under mixed-mode loading. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 62, 511–534.Google Scholar
  28. Schreyer, H.L., Kulak, R.F. and Kramer, J.M. (1979). Accurate numerical solutions for elastic-plastic models. Transactions of ASME, Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology 101, 226–234.Google Scholar
  29. Venkert, A., Guduru, P.R. and Ravichandran, G. (1998). Mechanisms of dynamic failure in Ni-Cr steels. SM Report 98-5, GALCIT, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, USA.Google Scholar
  30. Williams, M.L. (1957). On the stress distribution at the base of a stationary crack. Transactions of ASME, Journal of Applied Mechanics 24, 109–114.Google Scholar
  31. Zehnder, A.T. and Rosakis, A.J. (1990). Dynamic fracture initiation and propagation in 4340 steel under impact loading. International Journal of Fracture 43, 271–285.Google Scholar
  32. Zehnder, A.T., Rosakis, A.J. and Krishnaswamy, S. (1990). Dynamic measurement of the J integral in ductile metals: Comparison of experimental and numerical techniques. International Journal of Fracture 42, 209–230.Google Scholar
  33. Zienkiewicz, O.C. and Taylor, R.L. (1989). The finite element method, Volume 2, Solid and fluid mechanics dynamics and non-linearity. 4th edn., McGraw-Hill, U.K.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • K.R. Jayadevan
    • 1
  • R. Narasimhan
    • 2
  • T.S. Ramamurthy
    • 3
  • B. Dattaguru
    • 3
  1. 1.Indian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia
  3. 3.Department of Aerospace EngineeringIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations