Skip to main content
Log in

Relationship between Interfacial Energy and Corrosion of Steel in Heterocyclic Compounds

  • Published:
Materials Science Aims and scope

Abstract

We have theoretically studied mechanical and electric phenomena at the interface St3 steel–electrolyte solution containing H2SO4 (0.1%) and also heterocyclic compounds with a concentration of (0.001–0.01) M. These compounds were N pyridine oxide, 2-aminopyridine, 4-picoline, pyridine, 2-butylpyridine, 3-picoline, 2.6-lutidine, pyridine zaldehyde, 3.5-lutidine, 3.5-dibromopyridine, quinoline, and lepidine. We took into account interfacial energy, interfacial tension, and also the variation of electric potential ΔΨ in the interphase region at ΔT = T aT b. We have established the relation between the interfacial energy and the corrosion coefficient for St3 steel in organic (corrosive) solutions. The results of computations were compared with analogous numerical data for corrosive solutions obtained by the Born–Mayer potential method, and these results agree well with each other. Deviations of the values of γ m and also of their variations do not exceed 5%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. V. M. Yuzevych, “Criteria of the strength of a solid with regard for the scale effect and the influence of environment,” Fiz.-Khim. Mekh. Mater., 35, No. 2, 80–85 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. W. Price and J. P. Hirth, “Surface energy and surface stress tensor in an atomistic model,” Surf. Sci., 57, No. 2, 509–522 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. H. Macmillan, “The ideal strength of solids,” in: R. Latanision and J. R. Pickens (editors), Atomistics of Fracture, Plenum, New York (1983), pp. 95–164.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Mostoller and M. Rasolt, “Pair potentials at simple metal surfaces,” Phys. Lett., 88A, No. 2, 93–96 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  5. N. Eustathopoulus and J.-C. Joud, “Interfacial tension and adsorption of metallic systems,” in: Curr. Top. Mater. Sci., Vol. 4 (1980), pp. 281–360.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tables of Physical Quantities: Handbook [in Russian], Atomizdat, Moscow (1976).

  7. M. Green (editor), Solid State Surface Science, Vol. 1, Marcel Dekker, New York (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  8. V. P. Kuprin, M. V. Ivanova, and A. G. Teplitskaya, “Some specific features of the adsorption and inhibitor properties of heterocycles on iron and steel,” in: Proc. of the 4th Int. Conf.-Exhibition “Problems of Corrosion and Rust Protection of Materials” (“Corrosion-98,” Lviv, June 9-11) [in Ukrainian], PMI, Lviv (1998), pp. 332–334.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. B. Partenskii, “A self-consistent electronic theory of metal surface,” Usp. Fiz. Nauk, 128, No. 1, 69–106 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. C. Montgomery, Design and Analysis of Experiments [Russian translation], Mir, Moscow (1981).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soprunyuk, P.M., Yuzevych, V.M., Luhovyi, P.V. et al. Relationship between Interfacial Energy and Corrosion of Steel in Heterocyclic Compounds. Materials Science 38, 88–94 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020128916520

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020128916520

Keywords

Navigation