Skip to main content
Log in

Early generation selection for potato tuber quality in progenies of late blight resistant parents

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Developing disease resistant cultivars is one of the major objectives for a potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) breeding program, but many resistant clones have not achieved commercial acceptance because of late maturity and non-marketable tuber characteristics. Selection for tuber quality should have greater emphasis inbreeding disease resistant cultivars. The objectives of this study were 1) to evaluate the ability of late blight (Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary) resistant parents to transmit chip-processing (tuber appearance, specificgravity, and chip-color) or tablestock (tuber appearance) quality to the offspring and 2) to compare selecting for tuber quality in single-hill versus eight-hill generations. We made crosses among eight unadapted potato cultivars (B0718-3,Bertita, Bzura, Greta, Libertas, Stobrawa, Tollocan, and Zarevo) with reported late blight resistance with adapted susceptible cultivars/breeding clones to generate 95populations (4,750 seedlings). Approximately 10% of the progeny from each cross were selected from single-hill plots based on tuber appearance, number, shape, and internal defects. These selected clones (408) were evaluated for tuber appearance, specific gravity, and chip-color. The same evaluations in the following year were made on tuber samples from eight-hill plots. Libertas and Tollocan were the best parents for transmitting chip-color; B0718-3, Zarevo, and Tollocan for transmitting tuber appearance; and Bzura, Libertas, and Zarevo for transmitting high specific gravity to the highest percentage of the offspring. Overall, 50% and 56% of the clones based on single- and eight-hill generation, respectively, were considered to possess chip-processing quality; over 90% of the clones had acceptable tablestock quality. A total of 71% of the clones possessing acceptable chip-processing and 95% of the clones possessing acceptable tablestock quality selected in both generations were identified in single-hill plots. The evaluation of tuber quality characteristics in single-hill generation not only permitted the identification of clones with acceptable chip-processing and tablestock, but also increased the amount of clonal information for the following generation of selection. In crosses between late blight resistant and susceptible clones, selection for tuber quality traits can be initiated in single-hill generation using a moderate selection intensity and precede late blight testing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J.A.D. & H.W. Howard, 1981. Effectiveness of selection in the early stages of potato breeding programmes. Potato Res 24: 289–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisognin, D.A., D.S. Douches, K. Jastrzebski & W.W. Kirk, 2002. Identification and selection of potatoes resistant to the US8 genotype of Phytophthora infestans from crosses between resistant and susceptible clones. Euphytica (In press).

  • Colon, L.T., D.J. Budding, L.C.P. Keizer & M.M.J. Pieters, 1995. Components of resistance to late blight (Phytophthora infestans) in eight South American Solanum species. European J Plant Pathol 101: 441–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale, M.F.B. & G.R. Mackay, 1994. Inheritance of table and processing quality. In: J.E. Bradshaw & G.R. Mackay (Eds.), Potato Genetics, pp. 285–315. CAB International, Cambridge, 552 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, H.T. & G.R. Johnston, 1974. Reliability of potato selection in the first clonal generation. Amer Potato J 51: 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douches, D.S., D. Maas, K. Jastrzebski & R.W Chase, 1996. Assessment of potato breeding progress in the USA over the last century. Crop Sci 36: 1544–1552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douches, D.S., W.W. Kirk, K. Jastrzebski, C. Long & R. Hammerschmidt, 1997. Susceptibility of potato varieties and advanced breeding lines (Solanum tuberosum L.) to Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary in greenhouse screenings. Amer Potato J 74: 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, D.S. & T.F.C.MacKay. 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Fourth edition. Prentice Hall, 464 p.

  • Frey, K.J. & T. Horner, 1957. Heritability in standard units. Agron J 49: 59–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, W.E. & S.B. Goodwin, 1997. Resurgence of the Irish potato famine fungus. Bioscience 47: 363–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, K.G. & D.R. Wilson, 1992. Correlations for yield and specific gravity between potato tuberling and second year field generations. Amer Potato J 69: 817–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helgeson, J.P., J.D. Pohlman, S. Austin, G.T. Haberlach, S.M. Wielgus, D. Ronis, L. Zambolin, P. Tooley, J.M. McGrath, R.V. James & W.R. Stevenson, 1998. Somatic hybrids between Solanum bulbocastanum and potato: a new source of resistance to late blight. Theor Appl Genet 96: 738–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamoun, S., E. Huitema & V.G.A.A. Vleeshouwers, 1999. Resistance to oomycetes: a general role for the hypersensitive response? Trends Plant Sci 4: 196–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J.D., J.M. Kolkman & K. Schneider, 1998. Breeding for yield in dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Euphytica 102: 342–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killick, R.J. & N.W. Simmonds, 1974. Specific gravity of potato tubers as a character showing small genotype-environment interactions. Heredity 32: 109–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, S.L., J.J. Pavek, A. Thompson-Johns & W. Bohl, 1998. Breeding progress for potato chip quality in North American cultivars. Amer J Potato Res 75: 27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lulai, E.C. & P.H. Orr, 1979. Influence of potato specific gravity on yield and oil content of chips. Amer Potato J 56: 379–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maris, B., 1988. Correlations within and between characters between and within generations as a measure for the early generation selection in potato breeding. Euphytica 37: 205–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neele, A.E.F., H.J. Nab, M.J. de Jongh de Leeuw, A.P. Vroegop & K.M. Louwes, 1989. Optimizing visual selection in early clonal generations of potato based on genetic and economic considerations. Theor Appl Genet 78: 665–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neele, A.E.F., H.J. Nab & K.M. Louwes, 1991. Components of visual selection in early clonal generations of a potato breeding programme. Plant Breed 106: 89–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, 1995. The SAS System for Windows. Release 6.12. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tai, G.C.C., 1975. Effectiveness of visual selection of early clonal generation seedlings of potato. Crop Sci 15: 15–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tai, G.C.C. & D.A. Young, 1984. Early generation selection for important agronomic characteristics in a potato breeding program. Amer Potato J 61: 419–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thill, C.A., S.J. Peloquin, 1995. A breeding method for accelerated development of cold chipping clones in potato. Euphytica 84: 73–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umaerus, V., M. Umaerus, L. Erjefalt & B.A. Nilsson, 1983. Control of Phytophthora by host resistance: problems and progress. In: D.C. Erwin, S. Bartnicki-Garcia & P.H. Tsao (Eds.), Phytophthora infestans: Its Biology, Taxonomy, Ecology, and Pathology, pp. 315–326. The American Phytopathological Society. St. Paul, Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bisognin, D.A., Douches, D.S. Early generation selection for potato tuber quality in progenies of late blight resistant parents. Euphytica 127, 1–9 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019983503697

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019983503697

Navigation