Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating Neural Spatial Interaction Modelling by Bootstrapping

  • Published:
Networks and Spatial Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper exposes problems of the commonly used technique of splitting the available data in neural spatial interaction modelling into training, validation, and test sets that are held fixed and warns about drawing too strong conclusions from such static splits. Using a bootstrapping procedure, we compare the uncertainty in the solution stemming from the data splitting with model specific uncertainties such as parameter initialization. Utilizing the Austrian interregional telecommunication traffic data and the differential evolution method for solving the parameter estimation task for a fixed topology of the network model [i.e. J = 8] this paper illustrates that the variation due to different resamplings is significantly larger than the variation due to different parameter initializations. This result implies that it is important to not over-interpret a model, estimated on one specific static split of the data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Efron, B. (1982). The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B. and R. Tibshirani. (1993). An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, M.M. (1998). “Computational Neural Networks: A New Paradigm for Spatial Analysis.” Environment and Planning A 30(10), 1873-1891.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, M.M. and S. Gopal. (1994). “Artificial Neural Networks: A New Approach to Modelling Interregional Telecommunication Flows.” Journal of Regional Science 34(4), 503-527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, M.M., K. Hlavackova-Schindler, and M. Reismann. (1999). “A Global Search Procedure for Parameter Estimation in Neural Spatial Interaction Modelling.” Papers in Regional Science 78, 119-134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornik, K., M. Stinchcombe, and H. White. (1989). “Multilayer Feedforward Networks are Universal Approximators.” Neural Networks 2, 359-366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, S., C.D. Gelatt Jr., and M.P. Vecchi. (1983). “Optimization by Simulated Annealing.” Science 220, 671-680.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBaron, B. and A.S. Weigend. (1998). “A Bootstrap Evaluation of the Effect of Data Splitting on Financial Time Series.” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 9(1), 213-220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, C.Z. and R.D. Duval. (1993). Bootstrapping: A Nonparametric Approach to Statistical Inference. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwefel, H.-P. (1995). Evolution and Optimum Seeking. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storn, R. and K. Price. (1997). “Differential Evolution-A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for Global Optimization over Continuous Spaces.” Journal of Global Optimization 11, 341-359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tibshirani, R. (1996). “A Comparison of Some Error Estimates for Neural Network Models.” Neural Computation 8(1), 152-163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weigend, A.S., B.A. Huberman, and D.E. Rumelhart. (1990). “Predicting the Future: A Connectionist Approach.” International Journal of Neural Systems 1, 193-209.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fischer, M.M., Reismann, M. Evaluating Neural Spatial Interaction Modelling by Bootstrapping. Networks and Spatial Economics 2, 255–268 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019923727752

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019923727752

Navigation