Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 31, Issue 5, pp 451–455 | Cite as

The Medicalization of Female Sexual Dysfunction: The Need for Caution

  • John Bancroft
Article

Abstract

The use of drugs such as Viagra to treat sexual dysfunction in women may be beneficial in a proportion of cases. However, there are a number of barriers to understanding and predicting which women are likely to benefit, and caution is required in approaching this clinical issue. Three relevant issues are discussed: (1) Male-female differences in sexuality. Three complimentary ways in which male and female sexuality differs are considered—women have less need for their sexuality to be influenced by reproductive hormones; their needs for sexual enjoyment and orgasm are not well met by conventional vaginal intercourse; and, as a result of the disjunction between female sexual response and reproduction and a possibly greater propensity for central inhibition of sexual response, women are more susceptible to the repressive effects of social constraints on sexuality; (2) Sex therapy. While conventional forms of sex therapy are well designed to address the particular psychological needs of women as well as men, the interface between psychological processes and physiological response is not well understood. For the same reason, we should expect difficulty in predicting when pharmacological effects on sexual response will be beneficial; (3) When is a sexual problem a sexual dysfunction? It is likely that many cases of impaired sexual response or interest in women are psychologically understandable and hence adaptive reactions to problems in the sexual relationship, and hence not dysfunctions. Until we can distinguish between such adaptive inhibitions of response and those that are maladaptive dysfunctions, we will have difficulty in predicting when pharmacological treatment will be helpful.

female sexual dysfunction medicalization male–female differences orgasm sex therapy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Bancroft, J. (1989). Human sexuality and its problems (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
  2. Bancroft, J. (1997). Sexual problems. In D. Clark & C. Fairburn (Eds.), Science and practice of cognitive behaviour therapy (pp. 243–257). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bancroft, J. (1999). Central inhibition of sexual response in the male: A theoretical perspective. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 23, 763–784.Google Scholar
  4. Bancroft, J. (in press). Androgens and sexual function inmenandwomen. In W. Bremner & C. Bagatell (Eds.), Androgens in health and disease. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bancroft, J. (2002). Sexual effects of androgens in women: Some theoretical considerations. Fertility and Sterility, 77(4), (Suppl. 4), S55-S59.Google Scholar
  6. Bancroft, J., Graham, C. A., & McCord, C. (2001). Conceptualizing women's sexual problems. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 27, 95–104.Google Scholar
  7. Bancroft, J., & Sartorius, N. (1990). The effects of oral contraceptives on well-being and sexuality. Oxford Reviews of Reproductive Biology, 12, 57–92.Google Scholar
  8. Beach, F. A. (1976). Cross-species comparisons and the human heritage. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 5, 469–485.Google Scholar
  9. Bjorklund, D. F., & Kipp, K. (1996). Parental investment theory and gender differences in the evolution of inhibition mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 163–188.Google Scholar
  10. Irvine, J. M. (1990). Disorders of desire. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Janssen, E., Vorst, H., Finn, P., & Bancroft, J. (in press). The Sexual Inhibition (SIS) and Sexual Excitation (SES) scales: I. Measuring sexual inhibition and excitation proneness in men. Journal of Sex Research.Google Scholar
  12. Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
  13. Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin C. E., & Gebhard, P. H. (1953). Sexual behavior in the human female. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
  14. Laumann, E. O., Paik, A., & Rosen, R. C. (1999). Sexual dysfunction in the United States: Prevalence and predictors. Journal of the American Medical Association, 281, 537–544.Google Scholar
  15. Lloyd, E. A. (1993). Pre-theoretical assumptions in evolutionary explanations of female sexuality. Philosophical Studies, 69, 139–153.Google Scholar
  16. Maines, R. P. (1999). The technology of orgasm. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  17. Masters, W. H., & Johnson, V. E. (1966). Human sexual response. London: Churchill.Google Scholar
  18. Masters, W. H., & Johnson, V. E. (1970). Human sexual inadequacy. London: Churchill.Google Scholar
  19. Michaelson, D., Bancroft, J., Targum, S., Kim, Y., & Tepner, R. (2000). Female sexual dysfunction associated with antidepressant administration: A randomized, placebo-controlled study of pharmacologic intervention. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 239–243.Google Scholar
  20. Rhodes, J. C., Kjerulff, K. H., Langenberg, P. W., & Gusinski, G. M. (1999). Hysterectomy and sexual functioning. Journal of the American Medical Association, 282, 1934–1941.Google Scholar
  21. Shifren, J. L., Braunstein, G. D., Simon, J. A., Casson, P. R., Buster, J. E., Redmond, G. P., et al. (2000). Transdermal testosterone treatment in women with impaired sexual function after oophorectomy. New England Journal of Medicine, 343, 682–688.Google Scholar
  22. Sipski, M. L., & Alexander, C. J. (1993). Sexual activities, response and satisfaction in women pre-and post-spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 74, 1025–1029.Google Scholar
  23. Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. NewYork: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Thompson, L. (1999) The wandering womb: A cultural history of outrageous beliefs about women. Amherst: Prometheus.Google Scholar
  25. Tiefer, L. (1991). Historical, scientific, clinical, and feminist criticisms of "The human sexual response cycle." Annual Review of Sex Research, 2, 1–23.Google Scholar
  26. Tiefer, L. (1995). Sex is not a natural act. Boulder, Co: Westview.Google Scholar
  27. Veith, I. (1965). Hysteria: The history of a disease. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. Warner, P., Bancroft, J., & Members of the Edinburgh Human Sexuality Group. (1987). A regional clinical service for sexual problems: A three year survey. Sexual and Marital Therapy, 2, 115–126.Google Scholar
  29. Watkins, E. S. (1998). On the pill: A social history of oral contraceptives, 1950–1970. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  30. WHO. (1995). Female genital mutilation report of a WHO Technical Working Group. Geneva: Author.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Bancroft
    • 1
  1. 1.The Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender, and ReproductionIndiana UniversityBloomington

Personalised recommendations