Abstract
This paper concerns the technological determinants of entrepreneurial behaviour. By applying a typology of technological regimes, which describes the nature of the technological environment in which firms operate, this paper examines the sources and obstacles to entrepreneurial entry related to the process of technical change. Two major points are suggested. First, innovation in technologies of high or increasing opportunities is not always associated with entrepreneurial behaviour, but can enhance the competitive advantage of existing firms. Second, opportunities for entrepreneurship are shaped by the nature of knowledge underlying different technologies. These points are illustrated using U.S. patent statistics classified by technical field and sector of firm's principal product activity. Different combinations of sources of technological entry barriers and technological opportunity are identified in science-based technologies, chemical technologies, core technologies in complex systems, product-engineering technologies and process-engineering technologies. This paper argues that such a characterisation of the dynamics of knowledge accumulation is important for interpreting the variety of dynamics of industrial competition.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Audretsch, D. B., 1995, Innovation and Industry Evolution, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Audretsch, D. B. and Z. J. Acs., 1994, 'New-Firm Start-ups, Technology, and Macroeconomic Fluctuations', Small Business Economics 6, 439–450.
Bain, J., 1956, Barriers to New Competition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cohen, W., 1995, 'Empirical Studies of Innovative Activities', in P. Stoneman (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Cohen, W. M. and D. A. Levinthal, 1990, 'Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective of Learning and Innovation', Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 128–152.
Dosi, G., 1982, 'Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories. A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinant and Direction of Technological Change', Research Policy 11, 147–162.
Dosi, G. and D. Lovallo, 1997, 'Rational Entrepreneurs or Optimistic Martyrs? Some Considerations on Technological Regimes, Corporate Entries and the Evolutionary Role of Decision Biases', in R. Garud, P. Nayyar and Z. Shapira (eds.), Technological Innovation: Oversights and Foresights, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dosi, G., F. Malerba, O. Marsili and L. Orsenigo, 1997, 'Industrial Structures and Dynamics: Evidence, Interpretations and Puzzles', Industrial and Corporate Change 6, 3–24.
Dosi, G., O. Marsili, L. Orsenigo and R. Salvatore, 1995, 'Learning, Market Selection and the Evolution of Industrial Structures', Small Business Economics 7, 411–436.
Freeman, C. and L. Soete, 1997, The Economics of Industrial Innovation, Third ed., London: Pinter Press.
Geroski, P. A., 1994, Market Structure, Corporate Performance, and Innovative Activity, New York: Oxford University Press.
Gort, M. and S. Klepper, 1982, 'Time Paths in the Diffusion of Product Innovations', The Economic Journal 92, 630–653.
Malerba, F. and L. Orsenigo, 1993, 'Technological Regimes and Firm Behavior', Industrial and Corporate Change 2, 45–74.
Malerba, F. and L. Orsenigo, 1996, 'Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation are Technology-Specific', Research Policy 25, 451–478.
Marsili, O., 2001, The Anatomy and Evolution of Industries: Technological Change and Industrial Dynamics, Cheltenham, U.K. and Northampton, MA, U.S.A.: Edward Elgar.
Nelson, R. R. and S. Winter, 1982, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harward University Press.
Orr, D., 1974, 'The Determinants of Entry: A Study of The Canadian Manufacturing Industries', Review of Economics and Statistics 56, 58–66.
Patel, P. and K. Pavitt, 1991, 'Large Firms in the Production of the World's Technology: An Important Case of “Non-Globalisation”', Journal of International Business Studies 22, 1–21.
Patel, P. and K. Pavitt, 1994, 'The Continuing, Widespread (and Neglected) Importance of Improvements in Mechanical Technologies', Research Policy 23, 533–545.
Patel, P. and K. Pavitt, 1995, 'Patterns of Technological Activity: their Measurement and Interpretation', in Stoneman, P. (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 14–51.
Patel, P., and K. Pavitt, 1997, 'The Technological Competencies of the Worlds Largest Firms: Complex and Path Dependent, But not Much Variety', Research Policy 26, 141–156.
Pavitt K., 1984, 'Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory', Research Policy 13, 343–373.
Pavitt, K., 1998, 'Technologies, Products and Organization in the Innovating Firm: What Adam Smith Tells Us and Joseph Schumpeter Doesn't', Industrial and Corporate Change 7, 433–452.
Rosenberg, N., 1976, Perspectives on Technology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schumpeter, J. A., 1934, The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schumpeter, J. A., 1942, Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, New York: Harper.
Sutton, J., 1998, Technology and Market Structure. Theory and History, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Teece, D. J., 1986, 'Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy', Research Policy 15, 285–305.
Utterback, J. M. and F. F. Suarez, 1993, 'Innovation, Competition and Industry Structure', Research Policy 22, 1–22.
Winter, S. G., 1984, 'Schumpeterian Competition in Alternative Technological Regimes', Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization 5, 287–320.
Winter, S. G., 1987, 'Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets', in D. Teece (ed.), The Competitive Challenge. Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marsili, O. Technological Regimes and Sources of Entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics 19, 217–231 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019670009693
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019670009693