Abstract
In his recent book, Knowledge in a SocialWorld, Alvin Goldman claims to haveestablished that if a reasoner starts withaccurate estimates of the reliability of newevidence and conditionalizes on thisevidence, then this reasoner is objectively likely to end up closer to thetruth. In this paper, I argue that Goldman'sresult is not nearly as philosophicallysignificant as he would have us believe. First, accurately estimating the reliability ofevidence – in the sense that Goldman requires –is not quite as easy as it might sound. Second, being objectively likely to end upcloser to the truth – in the sense that Goldmanestablishes – is not quite as valuable as itmight sound.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Albert, D. (1992): Quantum Mechanics and Experience, Cambridge: Harvard.
Alston, W.P. (1988): ‘The Deontological Conception of Epistemic Justification’, Philosophical Perspectives 2, 257-299.
Beebee, H. and Papineau, D. (1997): ‘Probability as a Guide to Life’, Journal of Philosophy 94, 217-243.
Conee, E. and Feldman, R. (1998): ‘The Generality Problem for Reliabilism’, Philosophical Studies 89, 1-29.
Fallis, D. and Liddell, G. ‘Further Results on Inquiry and Truth Possession’, unpublished manuscript.
Goldman, A. (1999): Knowledge in a Social World, New York: Oxford.
Goldman, A. (1992): Liaisons, Cambridge: MIT.
Goldman, A. and Shaked, M. (1991): ‘An Economic Model of Scientific Activity and Truth Acquisition’, Philosophical Studies 63, 31-55.
Good, I.J. (1974): ‘A Little Learning Can Be Dangerous’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25, 340-342.
Hammett, D. (1934): The Maltese Falcon, New York: Modern Library.
Horwich, P. (1982): Probability and Evidence, Cambridge: Cambridge.
Levi, I. (1967): Gambling With Truth, Cambridge: MIT.
Maher, P. (1990): ‘Why Scientists Gather Evidence’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 41, 103-119.
Oddie, G. (1986): Likeness to Truth, Dordrecht: Reidel.
Rawls, J. (1971): A Theory of Justice, Cambridge: Harvard.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fallis, D. Goldman on Probabilistic Inference. Philosophical Studies 109, 223–240 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019644929122
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019644929122