Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The CIOMS's Distributive Justice Principle: A Reply to Dr Benatar

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  1. Benatar, S. Distributive justice and clinical trials in the Third World. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 2001;22: 169–176.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cooley, D. Distributive justice and clinical trials in the Third World. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 2001; 22: 151–167.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Geneva: CIOMS, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bankowski Z, Levine RJ. eds. Ethics and Research on Human Subjects: International Guidelines. Geneva: CIOMS, 1993: 26.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Annas GJ, Grodin MA. Human rights and maternal-fetal HIV transmission prevention trials in Africa. American Journal of Public Health 1998: 88: 560–563.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Crouch RA, Arras JD. AZT trials and tribulations. Hastings Center Report 1998: 28: 26–34.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Glantz LH, Annas GJ, Grodin MA, Mariner WK. Research in developing countries: Taking ‘benefit’ seriously. Hastings Center Report 1998; 28: 38–42.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, East Carolina University, A-327 Brewster Building, NC, 27858-4353, Greenville, USA

    D.R. Cooley

Authors
  1. D.R. Cooley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cooley, D. The CIOMS's Distributive Justice Principle: A Reply to Dr Benatar. Theor Med Bioeth 23, 11–18 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019541700377

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019541700377

Keywords

Search

Navigation