Abstract
The innovation design and process engineering, two inevitable interrelated stages in the development of a new technology, are captured in this paper as a non-antagonistic leader-follower target-pursuit system subject to uncertainty in market and technology changes. The innovation design team (leader) is driven by market needs, while the process engineering team (follower) then strives to attain suitable production means with a focus on technological availability and profitability. In face of uncertainty in market changes and technological advances, the proposed strategic regulation of overlaps (SRO) model addresses relevant scheduling issues such as when to start, to overlap, and then to end the development activities. We obtain the optimal timing of the overlaps in these development activities. An algorithm is developed to calculate the optimal overlap schedule which is easy to be implemented for realistic applications.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
L. Arnold, Stochastic Differential Equations: Theory and Applications(Wiley, New York, 1992).
B.L. Bayus, Speed-to-market and new product performance trade-offs, J. Product Innovation Management 14 (1997) 485–497.
S. Bhoovaraghaven, A. Vasudevan and R. Chandran, Resolving the process vs. product innovation dilemma: A consumer choice theoretic approach, Management Science 42 (1996) 26–42.
K. Clark and T. Fujimoto, Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization, and Management in the World Auto Industry (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1991).
W.M. Cohen and D.A. Levinthal, Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation, Admin. Sci. Quarterly 35 (1990).
W.M. Cohen, J. Eliashberg and T.H. Ho, New product development: The performance and time-tomarket tradeoff, Management Science 42 (1996) 173–186.
S. Datar, C. Jordan, S. Kekre, S. Rajiv and K. Srinivasan, New product development structures and time-to-market, Management Science 43 (1997) 452–464.
J. Gregory and C. Lin, Constrained Optimization in the Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control Theory(Van Nostrand Reihold, New York, 1992).
J.H. Hamilton and S.M. Slutsky, Endogenous timing in duopoly games: Stackelberg or Cournot equilibria, Games and Economic Behavior 1 (1990) 29–46.
D. Kirk, Optimal Control Theory: An Introduction(Prentice-Hall, NJ, 1970).
S. Klepper, Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over the product life cycle, American Economic Review 86 (1996) 562–583.
K. Kraft, Are product and process-innovations independent of each other?, Applied Economics 22 (1990) 1029–1038.
N.N. Krasovskii and A.I. Subbotin, Game-Theoretical Control Problems(Springer, New York, 1988).
J. Liu and L.M. Liu, Scheduling of engineering reviews in engineering-to-oder production, Working paper, School of Business, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (1999).
J. Liu and S.H. Nam, Regulated quality diffusion under quadratic costs, Internat. Transactions on OR 6 (1999) 393–409.
J. Liu, Manufacturing order fulfillment with dispersal feedbaack, Working paper, School of Business, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (1999).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, J. Regulation of Overlaps in Technology Development Activities. Annals of Operations Research 98, 123–139 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019248205603
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019248205603