Abstract
Recently a range of sophisticated large-eddy simulations of thecloud-topped boundary layer have been intercompared and furthercompared with observations and single column models. Here we comparethese results with perhaps the simplest model of the cloud-toppedboundary layer, namely a mixed-layer model. Results from the model aredescribed with two aims in mind. Firstly, the good results act as areminder of the success of simple models, and, secondly, we suggestthat a simple mixed-layer model could be used as a baseline for futuremodel intercomparisons.
The mixed-layer model is based on two assumptions that follow previousstudies. Firstly, the liquid-water potential temperature and the total waterspecific humidity are assumed to be constant with height in the boundarylayer. Secondly, turbulence entrains air across the inversion into the boundarylayer at a rate that is assumed to be proportional to the jump in radiative flux at the cloud top and inversely proportional to the jump in buoyancy at the inversion. The constant of proportionality is called the entrainment efficiency.
Results from the model for the entrainment rate and height evolutionof the boundary layer are compared with the observations and modelsconsidered in a EUCREM intercomparison study. Thepresent mixed-layer model accurately predicts the observed heightevolution of the boundary layer, but over-estimates the entrainmentrate to a similar degree as the large-eddy simulations. We show that,if the subsidence rate is reduced to the value given by observationsrather than the value used in the EUCREM intercomparison study,then the model agrees well with observed value of the entrainment rateif the entrainment efficiency is taken to be 0.6. With this value, themodel also agrees well with a further case study byBechtold et al. An entrainment efficiency of 0.6 is a little higherthan suggested by large eddy simulations, but such simulations do notcurrently resolve the entrainment events explicitly. Hence this pointdeserves further study.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albrecht, B. A., Bretherton, C. S., Johnson, D., Schubert, W. H., and Frisch, A. S.: 1995, ‘The Atlantic Stratocumulus Transition Experiment-ASTEX’ Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 76, 889-904.
Albrecht, B. A., Penc, R. S., and Schubert, W. H.: 1985, ‘An Observational Study of Cloud-Topped Mixed Layers’ J. Atmos. Sci. 42, 800-822.
Bechtold, P., Krueger, S. K., Lewellen, W. S., van Meijgaard, E., Moeng, C.-H., Randall, D. A., van Ulden, A., and Wang, S.: 1996, ‘Modelling a Stratocumulus-Topped PBL: Intercomparison among One-Dimensional Codes and with Large Eddy Simulation’ Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 77, 2033-2042.
Bennetts, D. A., McCallum, E., and Nicholls, S.: 1986, ‘Stratocumulus: An Introductory Account’ Meteorol. Mag. 115, 65-76.
Betts, A. K. and Boers, R.: 1990, ‘A Cloudiness Transition in a Marine Boundary Layer’ J. Atmos. Sci. 47, 1480-1497.
Bretherton, C. S. and Pincus, R.: 1995, ‘Cloudiness and Marine Boundary Layer Dynamics in the ASTEX Lagrangian Experiment. Part I: Synoptic Setting and Vertical Structure’ J. Atmos. Sci. 52, 2707-2723.
Bretherton, C. S., Austin, P., and Siems, S. T.: 1995, ‘Cloudiness and Marine Boundary Layer Dynamics in the ASTEX Lagrangian Experiment. Part II: Drizzle, Surface Fluxes and Entrainment’ J. Atmos. Sci. 52, 2724-2735.
Brost, R. A., Lenschow, D. H., and Wyngaard, J. C.: 1982, ‘Marine Stratocumulus Layers. Part I: Mean Conditions’ J. Atmos. Sci. 39, 800-817.
Carson, D. J.: 1973, ‘The Development of a Dry Inversion-Capped Convectively Unstable Boundary Layer’ Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 99, 450-467.
de Roode, S. R. and Duynkerke, P. G.: 1997, ‘Observed Lagrangian Transition of Stratocumulus into Cumulus during ASTEX: Mean State and Turbulent Structure’ J. Atmos. Sci. 54, 2157-2173.
Driedonks, A. G. M. and Duynkerke, P. G.: 1989, ‘Current Problems in the Stratocumulus-Topped Boundary Layer’ Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 46, 275-303.
Duynkerke, P. G., Jonker, P. J., Chlond, A., Van Zanten,M. C., Cuxart, J., Clark, P., Sanchez, E., Martin, G., Lenderink, G., and Teixeira, J.: 1999, ‘Intercomparison of Three-and One-Dimensional Model Simulations and Aircraft Observations of Stratocumulus’ Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 92, 453-487.
Garratt, J. R.: 1992, The Atmospheric Boundary Layer, Cambridge University Press, U.K., 316 pp.
Lilly, D. K.: 1968, ‘Models of Cloud-Topped Mixed-Layers under a Strong Inversion’ Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 94, 292-309.
Lock, A. P. and MacVean, M. K.: 1999, ‘The Parametrization of Entrainment Driven by Surface Heating and Cloud-Top Cooling’ Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 125, 271-299.
Ludlam, F. H.: 1980, Clouds and Storms-The Behaviour and Effect of Water in the Atmosphere, Pennsylvania State University Press, U.S.A., 405 pp.
Moeng, C.-H., Cotton, W. R., Bretherton, C., Chlond, A., Khairoutdinov, M., Krueger, S., Lewellen, W. S., MacVean, M. K., Pasquier, J. R. M., Rand, H. A., Siebesma, A. P., Stevens, B., and Sykes, R. I.: 1996, ‘Simulation of a Stratocumulus-Topped Planetary Boundary Layer: Intercomparison among Different Numerical Codes’ Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 77, 261-278.
Nicholls, S.: 1984, ‘The Dynamics of Stratocumulus: Aircraft Observations and Comparisons with a Mixed-Layer Model’ Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 110, 783-820.
Nicholls, S. and Leighton, J.: 1986, ‘An Observational Study of the Structure of Stratiform Cloud Sheets: Part I. Structure’ Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 112, 431-460.
Rogers, D. P., Businger, J. A., and Charnock, H: 1997, ‘A Numerical Investigation of the JASIN Atmospheric Boundary Layer’ Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 32, 373-399.
Sayler, B. J. and Breidenthal, R. E.: 1998, ‘Laboratory Simulations of Radiatively Induced Entrainment in Stratiform Clouds’ J. Geophys. Res. 103, 8827-8837.
Slingo, A., Brown, R., and Wrench, C. L.: 1982a, ‘A Field Study of Nocturnal Stratocumulus; III. High Resolution Radiative and Microphysical Observations’ Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 108, 145-165.
Slingo, A., Nicholls, S., and Schmetz, J.: 1982b, ‘Aircraft Observations of Marine Stratocumulus during JASIN’ Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 108, 145-165.
Stage, S. A. and Businger, J. A.: 1981a, ‘A Model for Entrainment into a Cloud-Topped Marine Boundary Layer. Part I: Model Description and Application to a Cold-Air Outbreak Episode’ J. Atmos. Sci. 38, 2213-2229.
Stage, S. A. and Businger, J. A.: 1981b, ‘A Model for Entrainment into a Cloud-Topped Marine Boundary Layer. Part II: Discussion of Model Behaviour and Comparison with Other Models’ J. Atmos. Sci. 38, 2230-2242.
Stull, R. B.: 1988, An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 666 pp
Sullivan, P. P., Moeng, C. H., Lenschow, D. H., and Mayor, S.D.: 1998, ‘Structure of the Entrainment Zone Capping the Convective Atmospheric Boundary Layer’ J. Atmos. Sci. 55, 3042-3064.
Turton, J. D. and Nicholls, S.: 1987, ‘A Study of the Diurnal Variation of Stratocumulus Using a Multiple Mixed Layer Model’ Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 113, 969-1009.
Van Zanten, M. C., Duynkerke, P. G., and Cuijpers, J. W. M.: 1999, ‘Entrainment Parameterisation in Convective Boundary Layers’ J. Atmos. Sci. 56, 813-828.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pelly, J.L., Belcher, S.E. A Mixed-Layer Model Of The Well-Mixed Stratocumulus-Topped Boundary Layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 100, 171–187 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019215221726
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019215221726