Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling of population dynamics of interacting species: effect of exploitation

  • Published:
Environmental Modeling & Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A model representing the predator‐prey interactions between two copepod species, Euterpina acutifrons and Temora stylifera, with unlimited resources was used to study effects of exploitation. Exploitation is modeled by harvesting strategies characterized through three parameters: the selectivity of gear, the frequency of harvest, and the intensity of harvest effort. Simulations of different harvesting strategies suggest that interactions between species influence the dynamic behaviors of the populations as well as harvesting yields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C. Abou Debs and P. Nival, J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 72 (1983) 125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. F. van den Bosch and W. Gabriel, Limnol. Oceanogr. 39 (1994) 1528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. F. Carlotti and S. Nival, J. Plankton Res. 13 (1991) 801.

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. Carlotti and P. Nival, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 84 (1992) 219.

    Google Scholar 

  5. F. Carlotti and S. Nival, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 84 (1992) 235.

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. Carlotti and A. Sciandra, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 56 (1989) 225.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C.W. Clark, Bioeconomic Modelling and Fisheries Management (Wiley, New York, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  8. C.J. Corkett and I.A. McLaren, J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. 50 (1970) 161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. C.S. Davis, Mar. Biol. 82 (1984) 31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. F. Doveri, M. Scheffer, S. Rinaldi, S. Muratori and Y. Kuznetsov, Theor. Pop. Biol. 43 (1993) 159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. W.C.M. Klein Breteler, N. Schogt and J. van der Meer, J. Plankton Res. 16 (1994) 1039.

    Google Scholar 

  12. F.W. Koester and D. Schnack, Dana 10 (1994) 179.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P.A. Larkin, Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 9 (1978) 57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. R.M. May, J.R. Beddington, C.W. Clark, S.J. Holt and R.M. Laws, Science 205 (1979) 267.

    Google Scholar 

  15. T.R. McClanahan, Ecol. Model. 80 (1995) 1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. C.B. Miller, M.E. Huntley and E.R. Brooks, Limnol. Oceanogr. 29 (1984) 1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. J.H. Nichols and A.B. Thompson, J. Plankton Res. 13 (1991) 661.

    Google Scholar 

  18. T.R. Parsons, in: Food Webs: Integration of Patterns and Dynamics, The impact of industrial fisheries on the trophic structure of marine ecosystems, eds. G.A. Polis and K.O. Winemiller (Chapman and Hall, London, 1995) p. 352.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Sciandra, J. Plankton Res. 8 (1986) 1149.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Sciandra, J.-L. Gouze and P. Nival, J. Plankton Res. 12 (1990) 549.

    Google Scholar 

  21. V. Stuart and S.C. Pillar, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 64 (1990) 227.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J.-M. Thébault, J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 93 (1985) 223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. S.-I. Uye and Y. Kayano, J. Crust. Biol. 14 (1994) 473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. E. Valdés Szeinfeld, Mar. Biol. 115 (1993) 301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. J.S. Wroblewski, J. Plankton Res. 2 (1980) 43.

    Google Scholar 

  26. S.T. Yassen, Compétition entre trois espèces de copépodes planctoniques en élevage: Euterpina acutifrons, Temora stylifera, Acartia clausi. Étude écophysiologique, Thèse Doctorat, Univ. P. et M. Curie, Paris VI (1984).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Souissi, S., Nival, P. Modeling of population dynamics of interacting species: effect of exploitation. Environmental Modeling & Assessment 2, 55–63 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019080420852

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019080420852

Navigation