Abstract
We use Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to measure the relative technical efficiencies of 164 HMOs licensed to practice in the United States in 1995 with data collected from the American Association of Health Plans. Health care output measures used in the analysis are the number of commercial, Medicare and Medicaid lives covered in each plan. Inputs to the model are health care utilization measures such as the number of medical and surgical inpatient days, number of maternity and newborn stays in days, number of outpatient and emergency room visits and the number of non‐invasive and invasive procedures performed on patients in an ambulatory setting. Mean efficiency of health plans was 40% (of the most efficient). We use multivariate analysis to try and explain variations in efficiency. Enrollment influences efficiency, with larger HMOs being more efficient than those with fewer enrollees. Plans with a more even distribution of Commercial, Medicare and Medicaid patients were more efficient on average than plans with heterogeneous mixes in enrollment. HMOs with Medicare patients are significantly less efficient, with efficiency decreasing with increasing Medicare participation in plan membership. Health plans in operation for longer periods of time had greater outputs with the same inputs. Health plans that had a majority of their enrollees in network or IPA type arrangements were more efficient as were for‐profit plans compared to not‐for‐profits. Policy implications are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. Ahern, R. Rosenman, M. Hendryx, K. Siddharthan and G. Silverstein, Predictors of HMO efficiency, Applied Economics 28 (1996) 1381–1390.
A.L. Hillman, Financial incentives for physicians in HMOs: is there a conflict of interest?, New England Journal of Medicine 317 (1987) 1743–1748.
A.L. Hillman, M.V. Pauly and J.S. Kerstein, Do financial incentives affect physicians' clinical decisions and the financial performance of Health Maintenance Organizations?, New England Journal of Medicine 321 (1991) 86–95.
S.C. Stearns, B.L. Wolfe and D.A. Kindig, Physician responses to fee-for-service and capitation payment, Inquiry 29 (1992) 416–425.
R.H. Miller and H.S. Luft, Managed care: past evidence and potential trends, Frontiers of Health Services Management 9 (1993) 3–37.
A.L. Hillman, W. Welch and M.V. Pauly, Contractual arrangements between HMOs and primary care physicians: three-tiered HMOs and risk pools, Medical Care 30 (1993) 136–148.
R. Rosenman, Health plans effects on inpatient resource use: contrary evidence about IPAs, The Journal of Socio-Economics 22(2) 131-140.
H.E. Frech and P.B. Ginsburg, The cost of nursing home care in the United States: government financing, ownership and efficiency, in: Health, Economics and Health Economics, eds. J. Van Der Gaag and M. Pearlman (North-Holland, New York, 1981) pp. 67–81.
K.W. Clarkson, Some implications of property rights in hospital management, Journal of Law and Economics 15 (1972) 363.
S.H. Shaw, The compelling issues of access to capital, Business Health (1985) 217.
D.R. Cohodes and B.M. Kinkead, Hospital Capital Formation in the 1980s (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1984).
M. Schlesinger, The rise of proprietary health care, Business Health 2 (1985) 7.
R.V. Pattison and H.M. Katz, Investor-owned and not-for-profit hospitals: a comparison based on California data, New England Journal of Medicine 309 (1983) 370.
D.F. Vitaliano and M. Toren, Cost and effficiency in nursing homes a stochastic frontier approach, Journal of Health Economics 13 (1994) 281–300.
M.D. Schlesinger, Blumenthal and E. Schlesinger, Profits under pressure the economic performance of investor-owned and nonprofit HMOs, Medical Care 24 (1986) 615–627.
S. Zuckerman, J. Hadley and L. Iezzoni, Measuring hospital effi-ciency with frontier cost functions, Journal of Health Economics 13 (1994) 255–280.
R.D. Banker, R.F. Conrad and R.P. Strauss, A comparative application of Data Envelopment Analysis: An illustrative study of hospital production, Management Science 32 (1986) 30–44.
A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper and E. Rhodes, Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research 3 (1978) 392–444.
P. Kooreman, Data envelopment analysis and parametric frontier estimation complementary tools, Journal of Health Economics 13 (1994) 345–346.
F.J. Hellinger, Specification of a hospital production function, Applied Economics 7 (1975) 149–160.
D. Wholey, R. Feldman and J.B. Christianson, Scale and scope economies among health maintenance organization, Manuscript, Department of Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie-Mellon University (March 1995).
R. Givens, Economies of scale and scope as an explanation of merger and output diversification activities in the HMO industry, Manuscript, School of Public Health, University of California at Berkeley (1995).
A. Gray and A. McGuire, Factor input in NHS hospitals, Applied Economics 21 (1989) 397–411.
S.M. Retchin and B. Brown, The quality of ambulatory care in medicare health maintenance organizations, American Journal of Public Health 80 (1990) 411–415.
I.S. Udvarhelyi, K. Jennison, R.S. Phillips and A.M. Epstein, Comparison of the quality of ambulatory care for fee-for-service and prepaid patients, Annals of Internal Medicine 115 (1991) 394–400.
J.P. Newhouse, Frontier estimation: How useful a tool for health economics?, Journal of Health Economics 13 (1994) 317–32.
M. Xue and P.T. Harker, Overcoming the Inherent Dependency of DEA Efficiency Scores. A Bootstrap Approach (Department of Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, 1998).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Siddharthan, K., Ahern, M. & Rosenman, R. Data Envelopment Analysis to determine efficiencies of health maintenance organizations. Health Care Management Science 3, 23–29 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019072819828
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019072819828