Abstract
The relationship between primary productivity and light intensity is usually modelled as a static representation of photosynthesis, assuming that the parameters describing the response to light are constant. However, these parameters have a dynamic behaviour justifying the development of dynamic models in order to improve the description of photosynthesis in the sea.
In this work a mathematical model is used to simulate several situations where the phytoplankton exposure to light is controlled by the temporal variation of light intensity and the vertical advective and diffusive flux. The model includes both a static and a dynamic description of photosynthesis. It uses object‐oriented methods to switch between different types of productivity response to light intensity and to potential photoinhibition effects.
The main conclusions emerging from the simulations performed are that the dynamic behaviour of the production–light curves is relevant in the simulation of primary productivity, and that this relevance is more pronounced under high light conditions and/or in the absence of vertical mixing. It is suggested that large scale models, where the time and spatial scales are too large to include the dynamic behaviour of the photosynthetic light response, may be parameterized by smaller scale simulations including the mentioned dynamic behaviour.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
B. Bayne, in: Bivalve Filter Feeders in Estuarine and Coastal Processes, ed. R.F. Dame (Springer, 1993) p. 1.
T. Brock, Ecol. Modelling 14 (1981) 1.
J.J. Cole, N.F. Caraco and B.J. Peierls, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 121 (1992) 1608.
Commission of the European Communities (CEC), Final report to the FAR program “Development of an ecological model for mollusc rearing areas in Ireland and Greece”, CEC, Brussels (June 1994).
K.L. Denman and J. Marra, in: Marine Interfaces Ecohydrodynamics, ed. J.C.J. Nihoul (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1986) p. 341.
J.W. Dippner, Continental Shelf Res. 13 (1993) 331.
P.H.C. Eilers and J.C.H. Peeters, Ecol. Modelling 42 (1988) 199.
P.H.C. Eilers and J.C.H. Peeters, Ecol. Modelling 69 (1993) 113.
P.G. Falkowski and J. LaRoche, J. Phycol. 27 (1991) 8.
P.G. Falkowski and C.D. Wirick, Mar. Biol. 65 (1981) 69.
M.J.R. Fasham and T. Platt, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B219 (1983) 335.
J.G. Ferreira, Ecol. Modelling 79 (1995) 21.
C.L. Gallegos and T. Platt, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 15 (1985) 125.
R.J. Geider and T. Platt, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 30 (1986) 85.
G.S. Janowitz and D. Kamykowski, J. Plankton Res. 13 (1991) 983.
A.D. Jassby and T. Platt, Limnol. Oceanogr. 21 (1976) 540.
S.E. Jørgensen, Integration of Ecosystem Theories: A Pattern (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1992).
S.E. Jørgensen, S. Nielsen and L. Jørgensen, Handbook of Ecological Parameters and Ecotoxicology (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1991).
J. Kromkamp and J. Peene, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 121 (1995) 249.
M.R. Lewis, J.J. Cullen and T. Platt, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 15 (1984) 141.
J. Marra, Mar. Biol. 46 (1978) 203.
J. Marra and K. Heinemann, Limnol. Oceanogr. 27 (1982) 1141.
P. Neale and J. Marra, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 26 (1985) 113.
C. Pahl-Wostl and D.M. Imboden, J. Plankton Res. 12 (1990) 1207.
T.R. Parsons, M. Takahashi and B. Hargrave, Biological Oceanographic Processes (Pergamon Press, 1984).
T. Platt, C.L. Galeggos and W.G. Harrison, J. Mar. Res. 38 (1980) 687.
L.I. Portela and R. Neves, in: Advances in Water Resources Technology and Management, eds. Tsakiris and Santos (Balkema, Rotterdam, 1994) p. 457.
J.F. Price and R.A. Weller, J. Geophys. Res. 91 (1986) 8411.
J.H. Steele, Limnol. Oceanogr. 7 (1962) 137.
R.A. Vollenweider, Mem. Ist. Ital. Hidrobiol. 18 (1965) 425 (Suppl.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Duarte, P., Ferreira, J. Dynamic modelling of photosynthesis in marine and estuarine ecosystems. Environmental Modeling & Assessment 2, 83–93 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019044907648
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019044907648