Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Methods for IA: The challenges and opportunities ahead

  • Published:
Environmental Modeling & Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. J. Adams, Risk (UCL Press, London, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Alcamo, IMAGE 2.0: Integrated Modeling of Global Climate Change (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Alcamo, E. Kreileman and R. Leemans, Global models meet global policy, Global Environmental Change 6(4) (1996).

  4. J. Alcamo, R. Shaw and L. Hordijk, The RAINS Model of Acidification: Science and Strategies in Europe (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Anastasi, Lessons learned from two decades of scenario development, Open meeting of the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change Research Community, Laxenburg, Austria.

  6. M.B.A. van Asselt, Global integrated assessment models as policy support tools: A triangular approach, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  7. M.B.A. van Asselt and J. Rotmans, Uncertainty in perspective, Global Environmental Change 6(2) (1996) 121–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M.B.A. van Asselt, C.A.M.H. Storms, N. Rijkens-Klomp and J. Rotmans, An overview and assessment of the last decade of European scenario studies, ICIS Working Paper 98-01 (1998).

  9. P. Bailey, C. Gough, M. Chadwick and G. McGranahan, Methods for integrated environmental assessment: Research directions for the European Union, Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI), Stockholm, Sweden (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  10. BCI, Economic vision on logistic and industrial junction Venlo, Buck Consultants International, Nijmegen, The Netherlands (1996) (in Dutch).

    Google Scholar 

  11. U. Beck, Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (Sage, London, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  12. M.M. Berk and M.A. Janssen, The interactive scenario-scanner (ISS), RIVM report 981508005, Bilthoven, The Netherlands (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  13. G.D. Brewer, Methods for synthesis: Policy exercises, in: Sustainable Development of the Biosphere, eds. W.C. Clark and R.E. Munn (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986) pp. 455–473.

    Google Scholar 

  14. K. Button, The future of European transport, in: The Future of Transportation and Communication: Visions and Perspectives from Europe, Japan and the USA, ed. R. Thord (Springer, Berlin, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  15. S.J. Cohen, Scientist-stakeholder collaboration in integrated assessment of climate change: Lessons from a case study of Northwest Canada, Environmental Modeling and Assessment 2(4) (1997) 281–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Conrad, Society and problem-oriented research: On the sociopolitical functions of risk assessment, in: Risk: A Seminar Series, ed. H. Kunreuther, IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Costanza and M. Ruth, Dynamic systems modeling for scoping and consensus building, in: European Chapter of the International Society for Ecological Economics, University of Versailles, Paris, France.

  18. R. Costanza and S.S. Tognetti, eds., Ecological Economics and Integrated Assessment: Participatory Process for Including Equity, Efficiency and Scale in Decision Making for Sustainability (SCOPE, Paris, 1998, in press).

    Google Scholar 

  19. V. Covello, Uses of social and behavioural research on risk, Environment International 4 (June 1984) 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  20. K.K. Cox and J.B. Higginbotham, Application of focus group interview in marketing, Journal of Marketing 40 (1976) 77–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. E.A.C. Crouch and R. Wilson, Risk/Benefit Analysis (Ballinger, Cambridge, 1982).

  22. C.E. van Daalen, W.A.H. Thissen and M.M. Berk, in: The Delft Process: Experiences with a Dialogue between Policy Makers and Global Modelers, eds. R. Leemans and J. Alcamo (1997).

  23. M. Douglas and A. Wildavsky, Risk and Culture: Essays on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  24. H. Dowlatabadi, Sensitivity of climate change mitigation estimates to assumptions about technical change, Energy Economics (1998, accepted).

  25. H. Dowlatabadi and M.G. Morgan, Integrated assessment of climate change, Science 259 (1993) 1813–1814.

    Google Scholar 

  26. H. Dowlatabadi and M.G. Morgan, A model framework for integrated studies of the climate problem, Energy Policy (March 1993) 209–221.

  27. C. Ducot and H.J. Lubben, A typology for scenarios, Futures 12 (1980) 15–57.

    Google Scholar 

  28. D. Dürrenberger, J. Behringer, U. Dahinden, A. Gerger, B. Kasemir, C. Querol, R. Schüle, D. Tabara, F. Toth, M. van Asselt, D. Vassilarou, N. Willi and C. Jaeger, Focus groups in integrated assessment: A manual for a participatory tool, ULYSSES working paper WP-97-2, Darmstadt University of Technology, Darmstadt, Germany (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  29. EC-DGXI, Vision 2020: Scenarios for a sustainable Europe, XI-120-97, European Commission, Directorate General XI, Environment, Nuclear Safety and Civil Protection, General Consultative Forum, Brussels (1996).

  30. EC-DGXVII, Energy in Europe: European energy to 2020 - A scenario approach, European Commission, Luxembourg (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  31. ECN, Energy scenarios for a changing Europe: Integration versus fragmentation, ECN, Petten, The Netherlands (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  32. J. Edmonds, H. Pitcher, N. Rosenberg and T. Wigley, Design for the Global Change Assessment Model, in: Integrative Assessment of Mitigation, Impacts and Adaptation to Climate Change, Laxenburg, Austria (1994).

  33. J. Edmonds and J.M. Reilly, Global Energy: Assessing the Future (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  34. B. Fischhoff, S.R. Watson and C. Hope, Defining risk, Policy Sciences 17 (1984) 123–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. S.O. Funtowicz and J.R. Ravetz, Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  36. S.O. Funtowicz and J.R. Ravetz, Risk management as a post-normal science, Risk Analysis 12(1) (1992) 95–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. S.O. Funtowicz and J.R. Ravetz, Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science, in: Social Theories of Risk, eds. S. Krimsky and D. Golding (Greenwood, Westport, 1992).

  38. S.O. Funtowicz and J.R. Ravetz, Science for the post-normal age, Futures 25(7) (1993) 739–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. S.O. Funtowicz and J.R. Ravetz, The worth of a songbird: Ecological economics as a post-normal science, Ecological Economics 10 (1994) 197–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. G. Gallopin, A. Hammond, P. Raskin and R. Swart, Branch points: Global scenarios and human choice - A resource paper of the Global Scenario Group, Polestar Series Report no. 7, Stockholm Environment Institute, Sweden (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  41. M. Grenon and M. Batisse, Futures for the Mediterranean Basin (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  42. J. Grin and R. Hoppe, Toward a comparative framework for learning from experiences with interactive technology assessment, Industrial and Environmental Crisis Quarterly 9(1) (1995) 99–120.

    Google Scholar 

  43. E.G. Guba and Y.S. Lincoln, Fourth Generation Evaluation (Sage, Newbury Park, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  44. A. Hausrath, Venture Simulation in War, Business and Politics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  45. C.S. Holling, Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management (Wiley, London, 1978, revision 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  46. L. Hordijk, Use of the RAINS model in acid rain negotiations in Europe, Environmental Science and Technology 25(4) (1991) 596–603.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. IPCC, Climate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  48. IPCC, Climate Change 1992 - The Supplementary Report to The IPCC Scientific Assessment (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  49. C.C. Jaeger, T. Barker, O. Edenhofer, S. Faucheux, J.-C. Hourcade, B. Kasemir, M. O'Connor, M. Parry, I. Peters, J. Ravetz and J. Rotmans, Procedural leadership in climate policy: a European task, Global Environmental Change 7 (September 1997).

  50. C.C. Jaeger, M. Chadwick, B. Wynne, S. Funtowicz, M. Giaoutzi, S. Giner, F. Toth, J. Jäger, G. Dürrenberger, J.R. Ravetz and C. Casilli, ULYSSES - Urban lifestyles, sustainability and integrated environmental assessment - RTD proposal for the European Community Framework Programme IV, Darmstadt Technical University, Darmstadt, Germany (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  51. W. Jager, M.B.A. van Asselt, J. Rotmans, C.A.J. Vlek and C. Boodt, Consumer behaviour: A modeling perspective in the context of integrated assessment of global change, 461502017, RIVM, Bilthoven, The Netherlands (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  52. W. Jager, M.B.A. van Asselt, J. Rotmans and C.A.J. Vlek, Consumer behaviour, a modeling perspective in the context of integrated assessment of global change, in: Sustainability in Question: The Search for a Conceptual Framework, eds. J. Köhn, J. Gowdy, F. Hinterberger and J. van der Straaten (Edward Elgar Publishers, Abingdon, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  53. S. Jasanoff, Bridging the two cultures of risk analysis, Risk Analysis 13(2) (1993) 123–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. B.B. Johnson and V.T. Covello, The Social and Cultural Construction of Risk: Essays on Risk Selection and Perception (D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  55. H. Jungermann, Psychological aspects of scenarios, in: Environmental Impact Assessment, Technology Assessment, and Risk Analysis, eds. Covello et al., NATO ASI Series, Vol. G4 (Springer, Berlin, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  56. H. Jungermann, Risk, in: Technology Controversy. Actual Key Notions for Public Debates, eds. H. Schütz and W.P.M. (IMK, Frankfurt am Main, 1993) (in German).

    Google Scholar 

  57. H. Kahn and A. Wiener, The Year 2000 (MacMillan, New York 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  58. E. Kämper, Sociology of risk: Implications for the analysis of environmental policy, European University Institute, Florence, Italy (1998). http://www.iue.it/WGES/ISS17/kaemper.h.

    Google Scholar 

  59. B. Kasemir, J. Behringer, B. de Marchi, C. Deuker, D. Durrenberger, S. Funtowicz, A. Gerger, M. Giaoutzi, Y. Haffner, M. Nillson, C. Querol, R. Schule, D. Tabara, M. van Asselt, D. Vassilarou, N. Willi and C. Jaeger, Focus groups in integrated assessment: The ULYSSES pilot experience, ULYSSES WP-97-4, Darmstadt University of Technology, Darmstadt, Germany (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  60. B. Kasemir, M.B.A. van Asselt, G. Dürrenberger and C.C. Jaeger, Integrated assessment: Multiple perspectives in interaction, International Journal of Environment and Pollution (special issue “Methods and Models for Decision Support”) (1998, accepted).

  61. P. Kassler, Energy for development, in: Shell Selected Paper (Shell, London, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  62. S. Krimsky and D. Golding, Social Theories of Risk (Praeger, Westport, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  63. D.A. Lashof and D.A. Tirpak, Policy options for stabilizing global climate, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, USA (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  64. J. Linnerooth-Bayer and M. Thompson, Risk and governance: Proposal to the European Science Foundation, IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  65. N. Luhmann, Risk: A Sociological Theory (De Gruyter, Berlin, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  66. MacCallaway, Personal communication (1998).

  67. W.J.M. Martens, Health impacts of climate change and ozone depletion: An eco-epidemiological approach, Ph.D. thesis, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  68. W.J.M. Martens, Health and Climate Change: Modeling the Impacts of Global Warming and Ozone Depletion (Earthscan Publications, London, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  69. D.G. Mayo and R.D. Hollander, Acceptable Evidence: Science and Values in Risk Management (Oxford University Press, New York, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  70. A. Mazur, Societal and scientific causes of the historical development of risk assessment, in: Society, Technology and Risk Assessment, ed. J. Conrad (London, 1980).

  71. D.H. Meadows, D.L. Meadows, J. Randers and W.W. Behrens, The Limits to Growth (Universe Books, New York, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  72. D.L. Meadows, D.H. Meadows and J. Randers, Dynamics of Growth in a Finite World (Wright-Allen Press, Cambridge, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  73. R. Mendelsohn, W. Morrison, M. Schlesinger and N. Andronova, Country-specific market impacts of climate change, unpublished manuscript (1996).

  74. M.W. Merkhofer, Decision Science and Societal Risk Management (D. Reidel, Boston, MA, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  75. I. Mintzer, A matter of degrees: The potential for controlling the greenhouse effect, Research report No. 5, World Resource Institute, Washington, USA (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  76. G.M. Morgan and M. Henrion, Uncertainty - A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  77. M.G. Morgan and H. Dowlatabadi, Learning from integrated assessment of climate change, Climatic Change 34 (1996) 337–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. W.D. Nordhaus, The Efficient Use of Energy Resources (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  79. W.D. Nordhaus, The DICE model: Background and structure of a dynamic integrated climate economy, Yale University, USA (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  80. W.D. Nordhaus, Managing the Global Commons: The Economics of Climate Change (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  81. T. O'Riordan, Risk perception studies and policy priorities, Risk Analysis 2(2) (1982) 95–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. T. O'Riordan, The impact of EIA on decision making, in: Environmental Impact Assessment, Technology Assessment and Risk Analysis, eds. V.T. Covello, J.L. Mumpower, P.J.M. Stallen and V.R.R. Uppuluri (Springer, Berlin, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  83. H.J. Otway and D. von Winterfeldt, Beyond acceptable risk: On the social acceptability of technologies, Policy Sciences 14 (1982) 247–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. H.J. Otway and D. von Winterfeldt, Risk management and acceptable risk criteria, in: Risk: A Seminar Series, ed. H. Kunreuther, IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  85. E.A. Parson, A global climate change policy exercise: Results of a test run, July 27-29, 1995, WP-96-90, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  86. E.A. Parson, How should we study global environmental problems: A plea for unconventional methods of assessment and synthesis, WP-96-157, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  87. E.A. Parson, Three dilemmas in the integrated assessment of climate change, Climatic Change 34 (1996) 315–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. E.A. Parson and K. Fisher-Vanden, Integrated assessment of global climate change, Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 22 (1997, submitted).

  89. Platform on Science and Ethics, Workshop reports on the societal debate on genetic research, W43, Rathenau Institute, The Hague, The Netherlands (1995).

  90. R.H.J. Prinn, A. Sokolov, C. Wand, X. Xiao, Z. Yang, R. Eckaus, P. Stone, D. Ellerman, J. Melillo, J. Fitzmaurice, D. Kicklighter and Y. Liu, Integrated global system model for climate policy analysis: model framework and sensitivity studies, Global Change Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  91. J.R. Ravetz, Integrated Environmental Assessment Forum: Developing guidelines for good practise, ULYSSES WP-97-1, Darmstadt University of Technology, Darmstadt, Germany (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  92. J. Risbey, M. Kandlikar and A. Patwardhan, Assessing integrated assessments, Climatic Change 34 (1996) 369–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. J.B. Robinson, Life in 2030: Exploring a Sustainable Future for Canada (UBC Press, Vancouver, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  94. J.B. Robinson, Of maps and territories: The use and abuse of socioeconomic modelling in support of decision making, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 42 (1992) 147–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Root and S. Schneider, Ecology and climate: Research strategies and implications, Science 269(52) (1995) 334–341.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. N.J. Rosenberg, P.R. Crosson, K.D. Frederick, W.E. Easterling, M.S. McKenny, M.D. Bowes, R.A. Sedjo, J. Darmstadter, L.A. Katz and K.M. Lemon, The MINK methodology: background and baseline, in: Towards an Integrated Impact Assessment of Climate Change: The MINK Study, ed. N.J. Rosenberg (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  97. J. Rotmans, IMAGE: An Integrated Model to Assess the Greenhouse Effect (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  98. J. Rotmans, Integrated visions for a sustainable Europe: An integrated assessment proposal, European Union, DG XII, Work Programme Environment and Climate (second phase), Brussels, Belgium (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  99. J. Rotmans and H.J.M. de Vries, Perspectives on Global Change: The TARGETS Approach (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  100. J. Rotmans and H. Dowlatabadi, Integrated assessment of climate change: Evaluation of methods and strategies, in: Human Choice and Climate Change: An International Social Science Assessment, eds. S. Rayner and E. Malone (Battelle Press, Washington, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  101. J. Rotmans and M.B.A. van Asselt, Integrated assessment: Current practises and challenges for the future, in: Ecological Economics and Integrated Assessment: A Participatory Process for Including Equity, Efficiency and Scale in Decision Making for Sustainability, eds. R. Costanza and S. Tognetti (SCOPE, Paris, 1998, in press).

    Google Scholar 

  102. H.-J. Schellnhuber, A. Block, M. Cassel-Gintz, J. Kropp, G. Lammel, W. Lass, R. Lienenkamp, C. Loose, M.K.B. Lüdeke, O. Moldenhauer, G. Petschel-Held, M. Plöchl and F. Reusswig, Syndromes of global change, Gaia 6(1) (1997) 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  103. S. Schneider, Integrated assessment modeling of climate change: Transparent rational tool for policy making or opaque screen hiding value-laden assumptions?, Environmental Modeling and Assessment 2(4) (1997) 229–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. SETAC, Guidelines for life-cycle assessment: A “code of practice”, Report of SETAC Workshop held at Sesimbra, Portugal, 31 March- 3 April 1993, Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) (1993).

  105. P. Slovic, B. Fischhoff and S. Lichtenstein, Rating the risks: The structure of expert and lay perception, in: Environmental Impact Assessment, Technology Assessment and Risk Analysis, eds. V.T. Covello, J.L. Mumpower, P.J.M. Stallen and V.R.R. Uppuluri (Springer, Berlin, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  106. J.P. van der Sluijs, Anchoring amid uncertainty, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  107. D. Smith, Eurofutures (Capstone, Oxford, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  108. C. Starr, Social benefit versus technological risk, Science 165 (1969) 1232–1238.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. R. Swart, Climate change: Managing the risks, Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  110. TCPA and CER, Manchester 2020: Sustainable development in the city region, Town country planning association (TCPA), Manchester, UK (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  111. F.L. Toth, Policy exercises, Simulation and Games 19 (September 1988) 235–276.

    Google Scholar 

  112. UN-DPCSD, Critical trends: Global change and sustainable development, Department for Policy Co-ordination and Sustainable Development, United Nations, New York, USA (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  113. C.A.J. Vlek and P.J. Stallen, Rational and personal aspects of risk, Acta Psychologica (1980) 273–300.

  114. H.J.M. de Vries, SusClime, Globo report series 11, RIVM, Bilthoven, The Netherlands (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  115. VROM, The Netherlands in 2030 - Exploration of spatial perspectives, Ministry of Housing, Planning and the Environment (VROM), The Hague, The Netherlands (1997) (in Dutch).

    Google Scholar 

  116. WEC and IIASA, Global energy perspectives to 2050 and beyond, WEC, London, UK (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  117. M.C. Weinstein, P.G. Coxson, L.W. Williams, T.M. Pass, W.B. Stason and L. Goldman, Forecasting coronary heart disease incidence, mortality and cost: the coronary heart policy model, American Journal of Public Health 77 (1987) 1417–1426.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. J. Weyant, O. Davidson, H. Dowlatabadi, J. Edmonds, M. Grubb, E.A. Parson, R. Richels, J. Rotmans, P. Shukla, R.S.J. Tol, W. Cline and S. Fankhauser, Integrated assessment of climate change: An overview and comparison of approaches and results, in: Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change, eds. J.P. Bruce, H. Lee and E.F. Haites (IPCC, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  119. C. Whipple, Opportunities for the social sciences in risk analysis, in: Environmental Impact Assessment, Technology Assessment and Risk Analysis, eds. V.T. Covello, J.L. Mumpower, P.J.M. Stallen and V.R.R. Uppuluri (Springer, Berlin, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  120. WHO, Health future research, World Health Statics Quarterly 47(3/4) (1994).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ICIS, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands

    Jan Rotmans

Authors
  1. Jan Rotmans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rotmans, J. Methods for IA: The challenges and opportunities ahead. Environmental Modeling & Assessment 3, 155–179 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019019024003

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019019024003

Keywords

Search

Navigation