Skip to main content
Log in

DEA and primary care physician report cards: Deriving preferred practice cones from managed care service concepts and operating strategies

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evaluating the practice patterns of the newly dominant force in managed care, the primary care gatekeeper, will be one of the toughest challenges facing health reformers in the United States. This paper introduces DEA as a tool to profile and evaluate practice patterns of primary care physicians. To illustrate these ideas, the practice behavior of 326 primary care physicians in a large Health Maintenance Organization were studied for one year. When two DEA models were compared, a cone ratio DEA model projected the excess utilization of more hospital days and fewer office visits than a DEA model without defined preferred practice regions. The application demonstrates how a cone ratio DEA model can incorporate strategic thinking and executive accountability when establishing clinical benchmarks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D.A. Bergman and R. Pantell, The impact of reading a clinical study on treatment decisions of physicians and residents, J. Med. Ed. 61(1986)380–387.

    Google Scholar 

  2. K.D. Bertakis and J.A. Robbins, Gatekeeping in primary care: A comparison of internal medicine and family practice, The Journal of Family Practice 24(1987)305–309.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Boland, Making Managed Health Care Work, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  4. L.D. Brown, Politics and Health Care Organization HMOs as Federal Policy, The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, Z.M. Huang and D.B. Sun, Polyhedral cone-ratio DEA models with an illustrative application to large commercial banks, Journal of Econometrics 46(1990)73–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, A.Y. Lewin and L.M. Seiford (eds.), Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology, and Applications, Kluwer Academic, Boston, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper and E.L. Rhodes, Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research 2(1978)429–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Charnes, Lectures on the mathematical theory of linear programming, in: An Intoduction to Linear Programming, A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper and A. Henderson, eds., Wiley, New York, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D.C. Cherkin et al., The use of medical resources by residency-trained family physicians and general internists, Medical Care 25(1987)455–469.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.A. Chilingerian, Investigating non-medical factors associated with the technical efficiency of physicians in the provision of hospital services, Best Paper Proceedings of the 1989 Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, August 1989, pp. 85–90.

  11. J.A. Chilingerian, New directions for hospital strategic management: The market for efficient care, Health Care Management Review 17,no. 4 (1992)73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J.A. Chilingerian, Evaluating physician efficiency in hospitals: A multivariate analysis of best practices, European Journal of Operational Research 80(1995)548–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. J.A. Chilingerian and M. Glavin, Temporary firms in community hospitals: Elements of a managerial theory of clinical efficiency, Medical Care Review 51,no. 3 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  14. J.A. Chilingerian and H.D. Sherman, Managing physician efficiency and effectiveness in providing hospital services, Health Services Management Research 3(1990)3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J.A. Chilingerian, Exploring why some physicians are more efficient: Taking DEA into the hospital, in: Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology, and Applications, A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, A.Y. Lewin and L.M. Seiford, eds., Kluwer Academic, Boston, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J.A. Chilingerian and H.D. Sherman, Evaluating and marketing efficient physicians toward competitive advantagem Health Care Strategic Management (May 1994)16–19.

  17. A.W. Childs and D. Hunter, Non-medical factors influencing use of diagnostic X-ray by physicians, Medical Care 10(1972)323–335.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Eisenberg, Doctors Decisions and the Cost of Medical Care, Health Administration Press, Ann Arbor, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Eisenberg, Physician utilization: The state of the art, Medical Care 23(1985)461–481.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Eisenberg and D. Nicklin, Use of diagnostic services by physicians in community practice, Medical Care 19(1981)297–309.

    Google Scholar 

  21. M.D. Finkler and D.D. Wirtschafter, Cost-effectiveness and Data Envelopment Analysis, Health Care Management Review 18,no. 3 (1993)81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. Fishbane and B. Starfield, Child health care in the United States, New England Journal of Medicine 305(1981)552–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. D.K. Freeborn et al., Determinants of medical care utilization: Physicians' use of laboratory services, AJPH 62(1972)846–853.

    Google Scholar 

  24. J.J. Glovar and G.J. Povar, The ethics of cost-conscious physician reimbursement, in: Paying the Doctor, J. Moreno, ed., Auburn House, New York, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  25. B. Golany and Y. Roll, An application procedure for DEA, OMEGA International Journal of Management Science 17(1989)237–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. S. Greenfield et al., Variations in resource utilization among medical specialities and systems of care, JAMA 267(1992)1624–1630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. J.L. Heskett, Managing in the Service Economy, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  28. A.L. Hillman, Managing the physician: Rules versus incentives, Health Affairs 10,no. 4 (1991) 138–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. E.W. Hoy, R.E. Curtis and T. Rice, Change and growith in managed care, Health Affairs 10,no. 4 (1991)18–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. R.E. Hurley and M.L. Fennel, Managed care systems as government structures: A transaction-cost interpretation, in: Innovations in Health Care Delivery, S. Mick, ed., Jossey Bass, San Francisco, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Interstudy, The InterStudy Edge, Interstudy, Excelsior, MN, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  32. J.P. Kassieier, The use and abuse of practice profiles, The New England Journal of Medicine 330 (1994)634–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. G. Kelly and N. Freundlich, Is there a doctor in the house?, Business Week (November 2, 1992) 124–125.

  34. R. Kravitz et al., Differences in the mix of patients among medical specialties and among systems of care, JAMA 267(1992)1617–1623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. R. Knox, Specialist care seen as driving cost, The Boston Globe (Wednesday, March 25, 1992).

  36. A. Lewin and J. Minton, Determining organization effectiveness, Management Science 32(1986) 514–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. B.J. McNeil, S.H. Pedersen and C. Gatsonis, Current issues in profiles: Potentials and limitations, in: Physician Payment Review Commission Conference on Profiling, No. 92-2, Physician Payment Review Commission, Washington, DC, 1992, pp. 46–70.

    Google Scholar 

  38. J. Noren, Ambulatory medical care: A comparison of internists and family-general practitioners, New England Journal of Medicine 302(1980)11–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. M.J. Norusis, SPSS for Windows: Base System User's Guide, Release 6.0, SPSS, Chicago, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  40. R.G. Petersdorf and R.H. Waldman, Is the American system preparing the right kind of physicians? Academic Medicine 68,no. 1.

  41. M. Reagan, Physicians as gatekeepers: A complex challenge, New England Journal of Medicine 317(1987)1731–1733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. M. Rosko, Measuring technical efficiency in health care organizations, Journal of Medical Systems 14(1990)307–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. R. Rosenblatt, Specialists or generalists: On whom should we base the American health care system, JAMA 26(1992)1665–1666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. L.M. Seiford and R.M. Thrall, Recent developments in DEA, Journal of Econometrics 46(1990) 7–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. J. Summer, Paying the primary care physician, in: Paying the Doctor, J. Moreno, ed., Auburn House, New York, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  46. E. Thanassoulis, A. Boussofiane and R.G. Dyson, Exploring output quality targets as the provision of perintal care in England using Data Envelopment Analysis, European Journal of Operational Research 80(1995)588–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. R.G. Thompson, L.N. Langemeier, C. Lee, E. Lee and R.M. Thrall, The role of the multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming, Journal of Econometrics 46(1990) 93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. H.G. Welch, M.E. Miller and W.P. Welch, Physician profiling: An analysis of inpatient practice patterns in Florida and Oregon, New England Journal of Medicine 330(1994)607–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chilingerian, J.A., David Sherman, H. DEA and primary care physician report cards: Deriving preferred practice cones from managed care service concepts and operating strategies. Annals of Operations Research 73, 35–66 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018993515090

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018993515090

Keywords

Navigation