Skip to main content
Log in

On accuracy of solutions for discrete optimization problems with perturbed coefficientsof the objective function

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An approach to the sensitivity analysis for discrete optimization problems with perturbedobjective function is presented. The problem is stated in the following general form:minĪ£eāˆˆY c(e) : Y āˆˆ F, where c = (c(e), e āˆˆ E) is a vector of weights for some finite set E,and F ā«… 2E is a given family of feasible subsets. It is assumed that the set of feasiblesolutions F is fixed, but the coefficients of the vector c may vary. The main problem consideredin this paper concerns the following question: How does the maximum relative errorof a given feasible solution depend on inaccuracies of the problem data? Two particularperturbations of the vector c are considered:(i) it is assumed that c is in a closed ball with radius Ī“ā‰„0 and center c oā‰„0 or(ii) the relative deviation of c(e) from the value co(e) is not greater than Ī“ for any e āˆˆ E, i.e.,|c(e) ā€ co(e)| ā‰¤Ī“ co(e), e āˆˆ E.For a given feasible solution X āˆˆ F , two functions of the parameter Ī“ are introduced: thesensitivity function s(X, Ī“) and the accuracy function a(X, Ī“). The values of s(X, Ī“) anda(X, Ī“) are equal to the maximum relative error of the solution X when the perturbations ofproblem data are of the type (i) or (ii), respectively. Some general, but computationallyinefficient formulae for calculating these functions are derived and their properties arestudied. It is shown that s(X, Ī“) and a(X, Ī“) are nondecreasing, convex functions with alimited number of breakpoints. A practically efficient method of calculating upper and lowerenvelopes for the accuracy function is presented. This method is based on the notion of kā€bestsolutions of the problem. It gives an interval to which the maximum relative error ofthe solution X must belong when the coefficients of vector c are given with accuracy Ī“. Theapproach is illustrated with an example of the symmetric traveling salesman problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A.M. Geoffrion and R. Nauss, Parametric and post-optimality analysis in integer programming, Management Science 23(1977)453-466.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  2. H.W. Hamacher and M. Queyranne, K best solutions to combinatorial optimization problems, Annals of Operations Research 4(1985/6)123-143.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  3. M. LabbƩ, J.F. Thisse and R.E. Wendell, Sensitivity analysis in minisum facility location problems, Operations Research 39(1991)961-969.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  4. E.L. Lawler, A procedure for computing the K best solutions to discrete optimization problems and its applications to the shortest path problem, Management Science 18(1972)401-407.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  5. E.L. Lawler, J.K. Lenstra, A.G. Rinnooy Kan and D. Shmoys (eds.), The Traveling Salesman Problem: A Guided Tour of Combinatorial Optimization, Wiley, Chichester/New York, 1985.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  6. M. Libura, Integer programming problems with inexact objective function, Control and Cybernetics 9(1980)189-202.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  7. M. Libura, Optimality conditions and sensitivity analysis for combinatorial optimization problems, Control and Cybernetics 25(1996)1165-1180.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  8. M. Libura, E.S. van der Poort, G. Sierksma and J.A.A. van der Veen, Sensitivity analysis and the k-best solutions for the traveling salesman problem, Technical Report PMMiO-2/95, Systems Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warszawa, 1995.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  9. C.J. Piper and A.A. Zoltners, Some easy postoptimality analysis for zero-one programming, Management Science 22(1976)759-765.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  10. R. Ramaswamy and N. Chakravarti, Complexity of determining exact tolerances for min-sum and min-max combinatorial optimization problems, Report No. WPS-247/95, Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta, 1995.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  11. G. Reinelt, TSPLIB ā€” A traveling salesman problem library, Report No. 250, UniversitƤt Augsburg, Institut fĆ¼r Mathematik, 1990.

  12. Y.N. Sotskov, V.K. Leontev and E.N. Gordeev, Some concepts of stability analysis in combinatorial optimization, Discrete Applied Mathematics 58(1995)169-190.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  13. G.R. Wilson and H.K. Jain, An approach to postoptimality and sensitivity analysis of zero-one goal programs, Naval Research Logistics 35(1988)73-84.

    Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Libura, M. On accuracy of solutions for discrete optimization problems with perturbed coefficientsof the objective function. Annals of Operations Research 86, 53ā€“62 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018991826728

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018991826728

Keywords

Navigation