Skip to main content
Log in

Restricted attention, myopic play, and thelearning of equilibrium

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We consider repeated play of noncooperative games in which agents have more decisionsto consider at every stage than their attention allows. However, under a monotonicityassumption, if every variable is adjusted cyclically, as guided by marginal payoffs, thenmyopic steps lead to Nash equilibrium in the long run.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H.H. Bauschke and J.M. Borwein, On projection algorithms for solving convex feasibility problems, SIAM Review 38(1996)367– 426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Benaim, A dynamical system approach to stochastic approximation, SIAM J. Control and Optimization 34(1996)437 – 472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Benveniste, M. Métivier and P. Priouret, Adaptive Algorithms and Stochastic Approximations, Springer, Berlin, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D.P. Bertsekas and J.N. Tsitsiklis, Parallel and Distributed Computation, Prentice-Hall, Englewoods Cliffs, NJ, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Y. Ermoliev and S.P. Uryasiev, Nash equilibrium in n-person games, Kibernetika 3(1982)85 – 88.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S.D. Flåm and C. Horvath, Network games; adaptations to Nash – Cournot equilibrium, Annals of Operations Research 64(1996)179 – 195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. S.D. Flåm, Approaches to economic equilibrium, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 20(1996)1505 – 1522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. D. Fudenberg and D.K. Levine, Theory of Learning in Games, Book draft, 1996.

  9. K.C. Kiwiel, Block-iterative surrogate projection methods for convex feasibility problems, Linear Algebra and Appl. 215(1995)225 – 260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. K.C. Kiwiel, The efficiency of subgradient projection methods for convex optimization, Part I and II, SIAM J. Control and Optimization 34(1996)660 – 697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. D. Monderer and L.S. Shapley, Potential games, Games and Economic Behavior 14(1996)124 – 143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M.J. Osborne and A. Rubinstein, Course in Game Theory, The MIT Press, London, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. Peyton Young, Learning and Evolution in Games, Book draft, 1996.

  14. B.T. Polyak and A.B. Juditsky, Acceleration of stochastic approximation by averaging, SIAM J. Control and Optimization 30(1992)838–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. C.W. Sanchirico, A probabilistic model of learning in games, Econometrica 64,(1996)1375 – 1393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. N.Z. Shor, Minimization Methods for Non-Differentiable Functions, Springer, Berlin, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  17. S.I. Zuhovickií, R.A. Poljak and M.E. Primak, Two methods of search for equilibrium points of n-person concave games, Soviet Math. Dokl 10(1969)279– 282.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J.W. Weibull, Evolutionary Game Theory, The MIT Press, London, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Flåm, S.D. Restricted attention, myopic play, and thelearning of equilibrium. Annals of Operations Research 82, 59–82 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018987409039

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018987409039

Keywords

Navigation