Skip to main content
Log in

Enhancing graphical simulation output using cluster analysis

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent work performed for the Federal Aviation Administration to support the development of future concepts of air traffic management has involved simulation modeling of patterns of airspace usage by commercial and business air traffic. The objective of these efforts has been to investigate the impacts of a pattern of airspace usage known as "free flight", whereby pilots and flight dispatchers have much more freedom to choose, say, direct or wind-optimal routing through airspace. One of the figures of merit investigated is a count of "convergence pairs" as a measure of the complexity of various traffic patterns. These are cases when aircraft in the simulation model fly close to each other. Interestingly, geographic plots of convergence pairs accumulated over time bring out certain features or patterns of congested air traffic flows or flight alignments. However, these plots are also thick with "noise" or extraneous convergence pairs, whose presence detracts from the ability to perceive congested air traffic flows. Cluster analysis has been found to be an effective method of filtering these displays so that the congested flow features are discernible. The process developed for this purpose is based on a two-pass clustering approach. The process has worked well for the simulation modeling performed to date. Classification of the locations of convergence pairs into congested flow corridors is visually appealing, and has helped distinguish differences in contrasting scenarios of airspace usage. The paper presents graphical results and describes the clustering algorithms employed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A.M. Law and W.D. Kelton, Simulation Modeling and Analysis, 2nd ed., McGraw Hill, New York, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. RTCA, Task Force 3 Interim Report on Free Flight, RTCA, Inc., Washington, DC, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.A. Hartigan, Clustering Algorithms, Wiley, New York, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. Everitt, Cluster Analysis, Halsted, New York, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P.H.A. Sneath, The application of computers to taxonomy, Journal of General Microbiology 17 (1957)201–206.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D.R. Cox, Note on grouping, Journal of the American Statistical Association 52(1957)543–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. L. Burke, ‘Conscientious’ neural nets for tour construction in the traveling salesman problem: The vigilant net, Computers and Operations Research 23(1996)121–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. W.H. Press et al., Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DeArmon, J. Enhancing graphical simulation output using cluster analysis. Annals of Operations Research 74, 321–332 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018986808246

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018986808246

Navigation