This paper formalizes and analyzes cognitive transitions between artificial perceptions that consist of an analogical or metaphorical transference of perception. The formalization is performed within a mathematical framework that has been used before to formalize other aspects of artificial perception and cognition. The mathematical infrastructure consists of a basic category of ‘artificial perceptions’. Each ‘perception’ consists of a set of ‘world elements’, a set of ‘connotations’, and a three valued (true, false, undefined) predicative connection between the two sets. ‘Perception morphisms’ describe structure preserving paths between perceptions. Quite a few artificial cognitive processes can be viewed and formalized as perception morphisms or as other categorical constructs. We show here how analogical transitions can be formalized in a similar way. A factorization of every analogical transition is shown to formalize metaphorical perceptions that are inspired by the analogy. It is further shown how structural aspects of ‘better’ analogies and metaphors can be captured and evaluated by the same categorical setting, as well as generalizations that emerge from analogies. The results of this study are then embedded in the existing mathematical formalization of other artificial cognitive processes within the same premises. A fallout of the rigorous unified mathematical theory is that structured analogies and metaphors share common formal aspects with other perceptually acute cognitive processes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
J.F. Allen, AI growing up — the changes and opportunities, AI Magazine 19(4) (1998) 13-23.
Z. Arzi-Gonczarowski, Wisely non rational — a categorical view of emotional cognitive artificial perceptions, in: Papers from the 1998 AAAI Fall Symposium: Emotional and Intelligent — The Tangled Knot of Cognition, ed. D. Cañamero, Orlando, FL, October 1998 (AAAI Press, 1998) pp. 7-12.
Z. Arzi-Gonczarowski, Categorical tools for perceptive design: Formalizing the artificial inner eye, in: Computational Models of Creative Design IV, eds. J.S. Gero and M.L. Maher, Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, University of Sydney, Australia (1999) pp. 321-354.
Z. Arzi-Gonczarowski and D. Lehmann, From environments to representations — a mathematical theory of artificial perceptions, Artif. Intell. 102(2) (1998) 187-247.
Z. Arzi-Gonczarowski and D. Lehmann, Introducing the mathematical category of artificial perceptions, Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 23 (3,4) (1998) 267-298.
A. Asperti and G. Longo, Categories, Types, and Structures (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1991).
M. Barr and C. Wells, Category Theory for Computing Science (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1995).
J. Barwise and J. Seligman, Information Flow, Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science, Vol. 44 (Cambridge University Press, 1997).
E.A. Bender, Mathematical Methods in Artificial Intelligence (IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 1995).
M. Black, Metaphor. in: Philosophical Perspectives on Metaphor, ed. M. Johnson (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, 1981) pp. 63-82. A reprint of an article from 1955.
S. Blackburn, Dictionary of Philosophy (Oxford University Press, 1996).
F. Borceux, A Handbook of Categorical Algebra (Cambridge University Press, 1993).
E. Boros, P.L. Hammer, T. Ibaraki, A. Kogan, E. Mayoraz and I. Muchnik, An implementation of logical analysis of data, Rutcor Research Report RRR 22-96, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (July 1996).
H. Caygill, A Kant Dictionary (Blackwell Publishers, Great Britain, 1995).
A. Clark, Being There, Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997).
R.L. Crole, Categories for Types (Cambridge University Press, 1993).
M.A. Croon and F.J.R. Van de Vijver, eds., Viability of Mathematical Models in the Social and Behavioral Sciences (Swets and Zeitlinger B.V., Lisse, 1994).
E.R. Doughherty and C.R. Giardina, Mathematical Methods for Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Systems (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1988).
S. Eilenberg and S. Mac Lane, General theory of natural equivalences, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 58 (1945) 231-294.
B. Falkenhainer, K.D. Forbus and D. Gentner, The structure-mapping engine, Artif. Intell. 41(1) (1990) 1-63.
G. Fauconnier, Mappings in Thought and Language (Cambridge University Press, 1997).
R.M. French, The Subtlety of Sameness — A Theory and Computer Model of Analogy Making, A Bradford Book, (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995).
M. Genesereth and N.J. Nilsson, Logical Foundations of Artificial Intelligence (Morgan Publishers, San Mateo, CA, 1987).
D. Gentner, The mechanisms of analogical learning, in: Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, eds. S. Vosniadou and A. Ortony (Cambridge University Press, 1989) pp. 199-241.
D. Gentner, Analogy in: A Companion to Cognitive Science (Blackwell, 1998) chapter II(1), pp. 107-113.
S.M. Glynn, R. Duit and R.B. Thiele, Teaching science with analogies: A strategy for constructing knowledge, in: Learning Science in the Schools: Research Reforming Practice, eds. S.M. Glynn and R. Duit (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 1995) chapter 11.
N. Goodman, Fact, Fiction, and Forecast (Harvard University Press, 4th edition, 1983).
S. Harnad, The symbol grounding problem, Phys. D 42 (1990) 335-346.
H. Herrlich and G.E. Strecker, Category Theory (Allyn and Bacon, 1973).
P.G. Hewitt, Conceptual Physics — The Highschool Physics Program (Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park, CA, 2nd edition, 1992).
D. Hofstadter, Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies — Computer Models of the Fundamental Mechanisms of Thought (Basic Books, 1995).
D. Holland and N. Quinn, eds., Cultural Models in Language and Thought (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987).
K.J. Holyoak and P. Thagard, Mental Leaps — Analogy in Creative Thought, A Bradford Book (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995).
E. Hutchins, Cognition in the Wild (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995).
B. Indurkhya, Metaphor and Cognition (Kluwer Academic, 1992).
B. Indurkhya, Metaphor as change of representation: an artificial intelligence perspective, J. Exper. Theor. Artif. Intell. 9(1) (1997) 1-36.
I. Kant, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals (Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., Indianapolis/Cambridge, 1992). Translated by J.W. Ellington. Originally published in 1785 as “Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten”.
J. Kolodner, Case-Based Reasoning (Morgan Kaufman, San Mateo, CA, 1993).
G. Lakoff, The death of dead metaphor, Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 2(2) (1987) 143-147.
G. Lakoff, Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things — What Categories Reveal About the Mind (The University of Chicago Press, 1987).
G. Lakoff and M. Johnson, Metaphors We Live By (The University of Chicago Press, 1980).
F.W. Lawvere, Tools for the advancement of objective logic: Closed categories and toposes, in: The Logical Foundations of Cognition, eds. J. Macnamara and G.E. Reyes, (Oxford University Press, 1994) pp. 43-55.
F.W. Lawvere and S.H. Schanuel, Conceptual Mathematics (Cambridge University Press, 1997).
D. Leake, ed., Case Based Reasoning: Experiences, Lessons, and Future Directions (AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, 1996).
J. Lukasiewicz, Many-valued systems of propositional logic (1930), in: Polish Logic, ed. S. McCall (Oxford University Press, 1967).
J. Lukasiewicz, On 3-valued logic (1920), in: Polish Logic, ed. S. McCall (Oxford University Press, 1967).
S. MacLane, Categories for the Working Mathematician (Springer-Verlag, 1972).
F. Magnan and G.E. Reyes, Category theory as a conceptual tool in the study of cognition, in: The Logical Foundations of Cognition, eds. J. Macnamara and G.E. Reyes (Oxford University Press, 1994) pp. 57-90.
M. Minsky, ed., Semantic Information Processing (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1968).
M. Mitchell, Analogy Mapping as Perception — A Computer Model, A Bradford Book (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993).
D.J. Moser, Sze-chuan pepper and Coca-Cola: The translation of Gödel, Escher, Bach into Chinese, Babel 37(2) (1991) 75-95.
B.C. Pierce, Basic Category Theory for Computer Scientists (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1991).
D. Ross, Metaphor, Meaning and Cognition (Peter Lang, 1993).
A. Sloman, Architectural requirements for human-like agents, both natural and artificial (what sorts of machines can love?), in: Human Cognition and Social Agent Technology, ed. K. Dautenhahn, Advances in Consciousness Research (John Benjamins Publishing, forthcoming).
P. Thagard, Mind (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996).
S. Vosniadou and A. Ortony, eds., Similarity and Analogical Reasoning (Cambridge University Press, 1989).
R.F.C. Walters, Categories and Computer Science (Cambridge University Press, 1991).
A.J. Wells, Turing's analysis of computation and theories of cogitive architecture, Cognitive Sci. 22(3) (1998) 269-294.
About this article
Cite this article
Arzi-Gonczarowski, Z. Perceive this as that – Analogies, artificial perception, and category theory. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 26, 215–252 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018963029743
- Category Theory
- Cognitive Transition
- Boolean Combination
- Categorical Construct