Abstract
Programmes in “Software Engineering” have become a source of contention in many universities. Some Computer Science departments, many of which have used that phrase to describe individual courses for decades, claim software engineering as part of their discipline. However, Engineering faculties claim “Software Engineering” as a new speciality in the family of engineering disciplines. This paper discusses the differences between traditional computer science programmes and most engineering programmes and argues that we need programmes that follow the traditional engineering approach to professional education and educate engineers whose speciality within engineering is software construction. One such programme is described.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boehm, B.K. (1994), “The IEEE-ACM Initiative on Software Engineering as a Profession,” IEEE Computer Society Software Engineering Technical Council Newsletter 13, 1, 1.
Buxton, J.N. and B. Randell (1970), “Software Engineering Techniques,” Report on a Conference sponsored by the NATO Science Committee, Rome, Italy, 27–31 October 1969.
DeMillo, R.A., R.J. Lipton and A.J. Perlis (1977), “Social Processes and Proofs of Theorems and Programs,” POPL: 206–214. Also published in Communications of the ACM 22, 5, 271–280.
McMaster University (1997), Undergraduate Calendar.
Naur, P. and B. Randell (1969), “Software Engineering,” Report on a Conference sponsored by the NATO Science Committee, Garmisch, Germany, 7–11 October 1968.
Spinoza (1677), Benedict: Ethics Part I.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Parnas, D.L. Software engineering programmes are not computer science programmes. Annals of Software Engineering 6, 19–37 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018949113292
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018949113292