Skip to main content
Log in

A Data Envelopment Analysis approach to Discriminant Analysis

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Discriminant Analysis (DA) are similar in that both may be used to classify units as exhibiting either good or poor performance. Both use linear programming to select a set of factor weights that determines group membership relative to a "threshold" or hyperplane. This similarity was pointed out in an earlier paper, in which several methods which combine aspects of DA and DEA were suggested. This paper further develops one of these hybrid methods, which can be described as an efficiency approach to Discriminant Analysis. The various formulation options are considered with respect to their effects on solution quality and stability. The stability issue is raised by the fact that solution equivalence under data transformation (including both translation and rotation) is considered important in DA, and has significantly affected model formulation. Thus, the data transformation issue is studied for the hybrid method, and also for DEA. The hybrid method is applied to an insurance data set, where some firms are solvent and others in financial distress, to further evaluate the method and its possible formulations. DA methods are applied to the same data set to provide a basis for comparison. The hybrid method is shown to outperform the general discriminant models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A.I. Ali and L.M Seiford, Translation invariance in Data Envelopment Analysis, Operations Research Letters 9(1990)403–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. S.M. Bajgier and A.V. Hill, An experimental comparison of statistical and linear programming approaches to the discriminant problem, Decision Sciences 13(1982)604–618.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R.D. Banker, A. Charnes and W. W. Cooper, Some models for estimating technical scale inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis, Management Science 30(1984)1078–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, B. Golany and L. Seiford, Foundations of Data Envelopment Analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions, Journal of Econometrics 30(1985) 91–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper and E. Rhodes, Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research 2(1978)429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, Q.L. Wei and Z.M. Huang, Cone ratio Data Envelopment Analysis and multi-objective programming, International Journal of Systems Science 20(1989)1099–1118.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M.J. Farrell, The measurement of productive efficiency, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A(1957)253–290.

  8. N. Freed and F. Glover, Simple but powerful goal programming models for discriminant problems, European Journal of Operational Research 7(1981)44–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. N. Freed and F. Glover, Resolving certain difficulties and improving the classification power of LP discriminant analysis formulations, Decision Sciences 17(1986)589–595.

    Google Scholar 

  10. F. Glover, Improved linear programming models for discriminant analysis, Decision Sciences 21 (1990)771–785.

    Google Scholar 

  11. F. Glover, S. Keene and B. Duea, A new class of models for the discriminant problem, Decision Sciences 19(1988)269–280.

    Google Scholar 

  12. G.J. Koehler, Characterization of unacceptable solutions in LP discriminant analysis, Decision Sciences 20(1989)239–257.

    Google Scholar 

  13. E.P. Markowski and C.A. Markowski, Some difficulties and improvements in applying linear programming formulations to the discriminant problem, Decision Sciences 16(1985)237–247.

    Google Scholar 

  14. D.F. Morrison, Multivariate Statistical Analysis, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, 1990.

  15. C.T. Ragsdale and A. Stam, Mathematical programming formulations for the discriminant problem: An old dog does new tricks, Decision Sciences 22(1991)296–307.

    Google Scholar 

  16. D.L. Retzlaff-Roberts, Relating discriminant analysis and Data Envelopment Analysis to one another, Computers and Operations Research 23(1996)311–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. A. Stam and C.T. Ragsdale, On the classification gap in mathematical-programming-based approaches to the discriminant problem, Navel Research Logistics 39(1992)545–559.

    Google Scholar 

  18. T. Sueyoshi, Measuring technical, allocative, and overall efficiencies using a DEA algorithm, Journal of the Operational Research Society 43(1992)141–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. J.S. Triechmann and G.E. Pinches, A multivariate model for predicting financially distressed P-L insurers, The Journal of Risk and Finance 44(1973)327–338.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Retzlaff-Roberts, D.L. A Data Envelopment Analysis approach to Discriminant Analysis. Annals of Operations Research 73, 299–321 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018937430111

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018937430111

Navigation