Skip to main content
Log in

Harvesting in a pelagic fishery: The case of Northern Chile

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyses the pelagic fishery of Northern Chile, estimating harvesting functions that contribute to understand why rather poor incentives to exit may predominate in pelagic fisheries, despite scarcer fish stocks. Our results show that per‐vessel catch's stock sensitivity (the catch‐to‐biomass elasticity value) varies negatively with stock levels. Stock levels preceding a marked fall into biological overfishing would have been associated to biomass elasticities lower than the unitary value. This suggests that during catch bonanza periods, catch‐per‐unit‐of‐effort would fail to detect a rapidly declining stock trend, increasing the risk of fishing collapse. Moreover, external economies in search efforts would have reduced the incentives to exit, particularly for the smaller vessels in our sample. Finally, we find evidence of either constant or increasing marginal returns in the use of per‐vessel fishing effort, which suggests that inefficiency in production has resulted from direct restrictions upon fishing effort. Overall, our findings provide consistent evidence that enhances the necessity of more efficient regulations upon harvesting in pelagic fisheries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. Abuaf and P. Jorion, Purchasing power parity in the long run, Journal of Finance 45 (1990) 157-174.

    Google Scholar 

  2. B.H. Baltagi, Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (Wiley, Chichester, UK, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Bhargava, L. Franzini and W. Narendranathan, Serial correlation and fixed effects model, Review of Economic Studies 49 (1982) 533-549.

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. Bjørndal, Production in a schooling fishery: The case of the North Sea herring fishery, Land Economics 65 (1989) 49-56.

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. Bjørndal, The optimal management of North Sea herring, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 15 (1988) 9-29.

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. Bjørndal and J. Conrad, The dynamics of an open access fishery, Canadian Journal of Economics 20 (1987) 74-85.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D.S. Butterworth, K.L. Cochrane and J.A. De Oliveira, Management procedures: A better way to manage fisheries? The South African experience, in: Global Trends: Fisheries Management, eds. E.K. Pititch, D.D. Huppert and M.P. Sissenwine, American Fisheries Society (AFS) Symposium 20, Proceedings, AFS, Maryland (1997).

  8. H.F. Campbell and R.B. Nicholl, Can purse seiners target Yellowfin tuna?, Land Economics 70 (1994) 345-353.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.W. Chung, Utility and Production Functions. Theory and Applications (Blackwell, Oxford, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  10. C. Clark, Mathematical Bioeconomics: The Optimal Management of Renewable Resources (Wiley, New York, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. Clark, Concentration profiles and the production and management of marine fisheries, in: Economic Theory of Natural Resources, eds. W. Eichhorn, R. Henn, K. Neumann and R.W. Shepard (Physica-Verlag, Wurzburg, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. Clark and G. Munro, Fisheries and the processing sector: Some implications for management policy, Bell Journal of Economics 11 (1980) 603-616.

    Google Scholar 

  13. C. Crone-Bilger, International and economic policy aspects of the Soviet Ocean-going fishing industry, Ph.D. thesis in Economics, University of London, UK (1990).

  14. J. Csirke, in: Small Shoaling Pelagic Fish Stocks, ed. J.A. Gulland (1988) chapter 11.

  15. J. Csirke and A. Gumy, Análisis bioeconómico de la pesqueria pelágica Peruana dedicada a la producción de harina y aceite de pescado, Boletin IMARPE, Vol. 15(2), Callao, Peru (1996) 68 p.

  16. D.H. Cushing, The Provident Sea (CUP, Cambridge, UK, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  17. J.H. Davidson, D.H. Hendry, F. Srba and S. Yeo, Econometric modeling of the aggregate time-series relationship between consumers' expenditure and income in the United Kingdom, The Economics Journal 88 (1978) 661-692.

    Google Scholar 

  18. D.A. Dickey and W.A. Fuller, Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit-root, Journal of the American Statistical Association 74 (Part 1) (1979) 427-431.

    Google Scholar 

  19. D.A. Dickey and W.A. Fuller, Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unitroot, Econometrica 49 (1981) 1057-1072.

    Google Scholar 

  20. P.B. Doeringer and D.G. Terkla, Troubled Waters. Economic Structure, Regulatory Reform and Fisheries Trade (University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  21. W. Greene, Econometric Analysis, 2nd edn (Macmillan, New York, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  22. J.A. Gulland ed., Fish Population Dynamics, 2nd edn (Wiley, Chichester, UK, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. Hannesson, Bioeconomic production function in fisheries: Theoretical and empirical analysis, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 40 (1983) 968-982.

    Google Scholar 

  24. D.F. Heathfield and S. Wibe, An Introduction to Cost and Production Functions (Macmillan, London, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  25. IFOP, Sistema de Información Pesquera: Pesquerías Pelágicas (Santiago, Chile, 1988).

  26. J.E. Kirkley, D. Squires and I.E. Strand, Assessing technical efficiency in commercial fisheries: The Mid-Atlantic Sea scallop fishery, American J. of Agricultural Economics 77 (1995) 686-697.

    Google Scholar 

  27. A. Koutsoyiannis, Theory of Econometrics, 2nd edn (Macmillan, London, 1986).

  28. D. Lipton and I.E. Strand, The effect of common property on the optimal structure of the fishing industry, J. of Environmental Economics and Management 16 (1989) 45-51.

    Google Scholar 

  29. P. Manning, Managing Namibia's marine fisheries: Optimal resource use and national development objectives, Ph.D. thesis, Development Studies Institute, LSE, University of London, December 1997 (1998).

  30. A.E. McEvoy, The Fisherman's Problem. Ecology and Law in the California Fisheries 1850-1980 (CUP, Cambridge, UK, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  31. K. McKelvey, The fishery in a fluctuating environment: Coexistence of specialist and generalist fishing vessels in a multipurpose fleet, J. Environmental Economics and Management 10 (1983) 287-309.

    Google Scholar 

  32. G. Munro, Bilateral monopoly in fisheries and optimal management policy, in: Essays in the Economics of Renewable Resources, eds. L. Mirman and D. Spulber (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982) chapter 10.

  33. W. Newey and K. West, A simple positive semi-definite, heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix, Econometrica 55 (1987) 703-708.

    Google Scholar 

  34. J. Peña, Economic analysis of marine industrial fisheries, Ph.D. thesis, Economics Department, QMW College, University of London, UK (1996).

  35. J. Peña, Chilean fishing regulation: A historical perspective, Cuadernos de Economia 100 (1996) 367-395.

    Google Scholar 

  36. J. Peña, The political economy of fishing regulation: the case of Chile, Marine Resource Economics 12 (1997) 239-248.

    Google Scholar 

  37. J. Peña, Harvesting preemption, industrial concentration and enclosure of national marine fisheries, Environmental and Resource Economics 14 (1999) 545-571.

    Google Scholar 

  38. M.H. Pesaran and R. Smith, Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels, Journal of Econometrics 68 (1995) 79-113.

    Google Scholar 

  39. J.P. Platteau, Penetration of capitalism and persistence of small-scale organizational forms in Third World fisheries, Development and Change 20 (1989) 621-651.

    Google Scholar 

  40. J.P. Platteau and J. Nugent, Share contracts and their rationale: Lessons from marine fishing, Journal of Development Studies 28 (1992) 386-422.

    Google Scholar 

  41. D. Sahrhage and J. Lundbeck, A History of Fishing (Springer, New York, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  42. K.G. Salvanes and F. Steen, Testing for relative performance between seasons in a fishery, Land Economics 70 (1994) 431-447.

    Google Scholar 

  43. W.E. Schworm, Monopsonistic control of a common property renewable resource, Canadian Journal of Economics 16 (1983) 275-287.

    Google Scholar 

  44. C.D. Scott, Land reform and property rights among small farmers in Chile, 1968-86, in: Neoliberal Agriculture in Rural Chile, ed. D.E. Hojman (Macmillan, London, 1990).

  45. K. Stollery, Monopsony processing in an open access fishery, Marine Resource Economics 3 (1987) 331-351.

    Google Scholar 

  46. H. White, A heteroscedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroscedasticity, Econometrica 48 (1980) 817-838.

    Google Scholar 

  47. E. Yañez, M.A. Barbieri and O. Barra, Evolución de los principales recursos pelágicos explotados en la zona Norte de Chile entre 1957 y 1985, in: La Pesca en Chile, ed. P. Arana, Escuela de Ciencias del Mar, UCV, Valparaiso, Chile (1986).

  48. A. Zellner, J. Kmenta and J. Drèze, Specification and estimation of Cobb-Douglas production function models, Econometrica 34 (1966) 784-795.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peña‐Torres, J., Basch, M. Harvesting in a pelagic fishery: The case of Northern Chile. Annals of Operations Research 94, 295–320 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018933603839

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018933603839

Navigation