Skip to main content
Log in

The studio approach toteaching the craft of modeling

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Successful applications of MS/OR depends on striking a balance between the science ofMS/OR (its tools and a body of related technical knowledge) and the craft of MS/OR, which isa much less well-defined collection of practical skills. Many observers note that the teaching ofMS/OR has emphasized the scientific aspects of the field to the near exclusion of the craft aspects.The major focus has been on the tools of MS/OR: linear programs, decision trees, queueingmodels, and so on. But for the practitioner, the tools or models themselves are only part of abroader modeling effort. Successfully teaching the craft of modeling has been a long-termchallenge in MS/OR. In this paper, I describe one successful approach, called the “studioapproach”, to teaching the craft of modeling to practitioners. This approach resembles the wayother arts such as painting or architecture are taught. I explore the analogy between teaching thecraft of modeling by first examining how the arts are taught, and then comparing how modelingis taught in a studio setting. One of many interesting connections between these two domains liesin the development of a specialized language by which the teacher communicates his or her craftto the student. I propose a number of modeling heuristics, or rules of thumb, which begin tocapture some of the language of the practising modeler.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Dewey, John Dewey on Education: Selected Writings, ed. R.D. Archambault, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  2. B.C. Eaves, Learning the practice of operations research, Interfaces 27(1997)104 – 115.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A.M. Geoffrion, The purpose of mathematical programming is insight, not numbers, Interfaces 7(1976)81 – 92.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H.F. Judson, The Search for Solutions, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Magazine, The problem of teaching problem solving – the studio approach, INFOR 18(1980)220 – 228.

    Google Scholar 

  6. W.T. Morris, On the art of modeling, Management Science 13(1967)B-707– B-717.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S.M. Pollock, Mathematical modeling: Applying the principles of the art studio, Engineering Education (November 1976)167 – 171.

  8. S.G. Powell, Teaching the art of modeling to MBA students, Interfaces 25(1995)88 – 94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S.G. Powell, Six key modeling heuristics, Interfaces 25(1995)114 – 125.

    Google Scholar 

  10. S.G. Powell, From intelligent consumer to active modeler: Two MBA success stories, Interfaces 27(1997)88 – 98.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Report of a survey of OR/MS programs, INFORMS Education Committee, OR/MS Today, (February 1995)54 – 56.

  12. D.A. Schön, The Reflective Practitioner, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D.A. Schön, Educating the Reflective Practitioner, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Starfield, K. Smith and A. Bleloch, How to Model It: Problem Solving for the Computer Age, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Master Plan: Suggestions for an MS/OR Master's Degree Curriculum 1993, ORSA/TIMS Committee for a Review of the OR/MS Master's Degree Curriculum, OR/MS Today 20(1993)16 –31.

  16. T.R. Willemain, Insights on modeling from a dozen experts, Operations Research 42(1994)213 – 222.

    Google Scholar 

  17. T.R. Willemain, Model formulation: What experts think about and when, Operations Research 43(1995)916 – 932.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Powell, S.G. The studio approach toteaching the craft of modeling. Annals of Operations Research 82, 29–48 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018918921334

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018918921334

Keywords

Navigation