Skip to main content
Log in

Statistical approximations forstochastic linear programming problems

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sampling and decomposition constitute two of the most successful approaches foraddressing large‐scale problems arising in statistics and optimization, respectively. In recentyears, these two approaches have been combined for the solution of large‐scale stochasticlinear programming problems. This paper presents the algorithmic motivation for suchmethods, as well as a broad overview of issues in algorithm design. We discuss both basicschemes as well as computational enhancements and stopping rules. We also introduce ageneralization of current algorithms to handle problems with random recourse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J.F. Benders, Partitioning procedures for solving mixed variables programming problems, Numerische Mathematik 4(1961)238–252.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.R. Birge, Decomposition and partitioning methods for multistage stochastic linear programs, Operations Research 33(1985)989–1007.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. Culioli and G. Cohen, Decomposition coordination algorithms in stochastic optimization, SIAM J. of Control and Optimization 28(1990)1372, 1403.

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. Efron, Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife, Annals of Statistics 7(1979)1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. Healy, Optimizing stochastic systems: A retrospective deterministic approach, Ph.D. Dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.L. Higle and S. Sen, Stochastic decomposition: An algorithm for two-stage linear programs with recourse, Mathematics of Operations Research 16(1991)650–669.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.L. Higle and S. Sen, Statistical verification of optimality conditions, Annals of Operations Research 30(1991)215–240.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.L. Higle and S. Sen, On the convergence of algorithms with implications for stochastic and nondifferentiable optimization, Mathematics of Operations Research 17(1992)112–131.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.L. Higle and S. Sen, Finite master programs in stochastic decomposition, Mathematical Programming 67(1994)143–168.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.L. Higle and S. Sen, Stochastic Decomposition: A Statistical Method for Large Scale Stochastic Linear Programming, Kluwer Academic, 1996.

  11. G. Infanger, Monte Carlo (importance) sampling within a Benders' decomposition for stochastic linear programs, Annals of Operations Research 39(1992)69–95.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J.E. Kelley, The cutting plane method for convex programs, Journal of SIAM 8(1960)703–712.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A.J. King and R.J-B Wets, Epiconsistency of convex stochastic programs, Stochastic and Statistics Reports 34(1989)83–92.

    Google Scholar 

  14. K.C. Kiwiel, Methods of Descent for Nondifferentiable Optimization, Lecture Notes in Mathematics No. 1133, Springer, Berlin, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J.M. Mulvey and A. Ruszczyński, A new scenario decomposition method for large scale stochastic optimization, Operations Research 43(1995)477–490.

    Google Scholar 

  16. E.L. Plambeck, B-R. Fu, S.M. Robinson and R. Suri, Sample path optimization of convex stochastic performance functions, Mathematical Programming 75(1996)137–176.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R.T. Rockafellar and R.J-B Wets, Scenarios and policy aggregation in optimization under uncertainty, Mathematics of Operations Research 16(1991)119–147.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R.Y. Rubinstein and A. Shapiro, Discrete Event Systems: Sensitivity Analysis and Stochastic Optimization by the Score Function Method, Wiley, New York, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Ruszczyński, A regularized decomposition method for minimizing a sum of polyhedral functions, Mathematical Programming 35(1986)309–333.

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. Sen, J. Mai and J.L. Higle, Solution of large scale stochastic programs with stochastic decomposition algorithms, in: Large Scale Optimization: State of the Art 1993, eds. W.W. Hager, D.W. Hearn and P.M. Pardalos, Kluwer Academic, 1994.

  21. R. Van Slyke and R.J-B Wets, L-Shaped linear programs with application to optimal control and stochastic programming, SIAM J. on Appl. Math. 17(1969)638–663.

    Google Scholar 

  22. R.J-B Wets, Stochastic programs with fixed recourse: The equivalent deterministic problem, SIAM Review 16(1974)309–339.

    Google Scholar 

  23. R.J-B Wets, Convergence of convex functions, variational inequalities and convex optimization problems, in: Variational Inequalities and Complementarity Problems, eds. J.L. Lions, R. Cottle and F. Giannessi, Wiley, Chichester, 1980, pp. 375–403.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Higle, J.L., Sen, S. Statistical approximations forstochastic linear programming problems. Annals of Operations Research 85, 173–193 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018917710373

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018917710373

Keywords

Navigation