Abstract
This economic analysis of farmers' voluntary adoption of water quality management alternatives integrates three biophysical simulators to predict crop yields and soil erosion/water quality impacts under uncertain weather and market conditions. Farmers' willingness to cost‐share was used to estimate expectations of net returns and associated water and soil pollution based upon government cost‐share scenarios. Simulations integrated into mathematical programming results indicate that irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer applications do not alter water quality in the Gum Creek Watershed as much as generally anticipated. Under limited government payments, pollution abatement through reduction of irrigation and/or nitrogen fertilizer applications significantly reduces farmers' net revenues and hence, without threats of other regulatory means, more farmers opt out of a voluntary program. Abatement of nitrogen runoff and leaching should consider other management alternatives and include non‐agricultural sources of pollution.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
K.J. Boote, J.W. Jones, G. Hoogenboom, G.G. Wilkerson and S.S. Jagtap, Peanut crop growth simulation model: User's guide (V1.02), Florida Agricultural Experiment Station, Journal No. 8420 (1989).
A. Brooke, D. Kendrick and A. Meeraus, GAMS: A User's Guide (The Scientific Press, Redwood City, CA, 1988).
J.P. Chavas, R.D. Pope and R.S. Kao, An analysis of the role of futures prices, cash prices and government programs in acreage response, West. J. Agri. Econ. 8 (1983) 27-33.
GCES (Georgia Cooperative Extension Service), 1993 South Georgia crop enterprise cost analysis, CES/AAE/UGA (1992).
GCES, USDA Demonstration Project Annual Report: Gum Creek Water Quality Project, CES, University of Georgia (1992).
Georgia State Soil & Water Conservation Commission (GSSWCC), Gum Creek Pilot Cost-Share Project Handbook, Georgia State Soil & Water Conservation Commission (1991).
J.E. Hook, Water Withdrawals for Irrigation in Drought Years, ERC 03-91, The Coastal Plain Experiment Station, The University of Georgia, Tifton, GA (1991).
W.G. Knisel, F.M. Davis and R.A. Leonard, GLEAMS Version 2.0: User Manual, Southeast Watershed Research Laboratory/ARS/USDA, Tifton, GA (1992).
W.G. Knisel, R.A. Leonard, F.M. Davis and J.M. Sheridan, Water balance components in the Georgia Coastal Plain: A GLEAMS model validation and simulation, J. Soil and Water Cons. 46(6) (1991) 450-456.
B.A. Murtagh and M.A. Saunders, MINOS 5.1 User's Guide, Report SOL 83-20R (revised), Stanford, CA (1987).
J. Ritchie, U. Singh, D. Godwin and L. Hunt, A User's Guide to CERES Maize-V2.10, 2nd edn, Michigan State University, IFDC & IBSNAT (1992).
J.O. Smith, The Law of Surface Water Allocation in Georgia, Institute of Natural Resources, The University of Georgia in cooperation with the Environmental Resources Center, Georgia Institute of Technology, ERC-578 (September 1978).
H. Sun, Economic analysis of water quality management in the Gum Creek Watershed cost-sharing program, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA (1994).
D.L. Thomas, M.C. Smith, R.A. Leonard and F.J.K. deSilva, Simulated effects of rapeseed production alternatives on pollution potential in the Georgia Coastal Plain, J. Soil and Water Cons. 45(1) (1990) 148-154.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Business Statistics, 1961-93, BEA, Washington, DC (1994).
H.F. Wright, Jr., An appraisal of water management alternatives for the Flint River basin, Unpublished M.S. thesis, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA (1984).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, H., Houston, J.E. & Thomas, D.L. Modeling voluntary participation in a cost‐sharing agricultural water quality management program. Annals of Operations Research 94, 125–138 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018917100204
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018917100204