Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

OMAC: An environment for modeling and analysis

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modeling involves a series of stages, from the initial concept or abstraction to potential use in industry, or some form of colleague or student exposure - a variety of processes and users. Modeling also implies a number of modeling paradigms - from optimization to simulations. A modeling environment supports the modeling life cycle and "general" modeling, not just one technique such as linear programming. We describe an information systems approach to the design of an integrated modeling environment - OMAC. The design requirements, system's architecture, and modeling capability of the OMAC modeling environment are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A.A. Angehrn, Modeling by example: A link between users, models, and methods in decision support systems, European Journal of Operational Research 55(1991)296–308.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A.A. Angehrn, Computers that criticize you: Stimulus-based decision support systems, Interfaces 23(1993)3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. Beizer, The Frozen Keyboard — Living With Bad Software, Tab Professional and Reference Books, Blue Ridge Summit, PA, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  4. I. Benbasat and P. Todd, An experimental investigation of interface design alternatives: Icon vs. text and direct manipulation vs. menus, Intl. Journal of Man-Machine Studies 38(1993)369–402

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Bharadwaj, J. Choobineh, A. Lo and B. Shetty, Model management systems: a survey, Annals of Operations Research 38(1992)17–67.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H.K. Bhargava, R. Krishnan and S. Mukherjee, On the integration of data and mathematical programming languages, Annals of Operations Research 38(1992)69–95.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.M. Binnie and D.L. Martin, The role of animation in decision-making, Proceedings of the 1988 Winter Simulation Conference, M. Abrams, P. Haigh and J. Comfort, eds., San Diego, 1988, pp. 272–276.

  8. G. Bonczek, C.W. Holsapple and A.B. Whinston, Foundations of Decision Support Systems, Academic Press, New York, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Q.B. Chung and R.M. O'Keefe, A formal analysis of the model management literature, Annals of Operations Research 38(1992)137–176.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Y. Dallery, R. David and X.-L. Xie, An efficient algorithm for analysis of transfer lines with unreliable machines and finite buffers, IIE Transaction 19(1988)150–159.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D.R. Dolk, A generalized model management system for mathematical programming, ACM Trans. on Mathematical Software 12(1986)92–126.

    Google Scholar 

  12. D.R. Dolk, An introduction to model integration and integrated modeling environments, Decision Support Systems 10(1993)249–254.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R.E. Eberts, User Interface Design, Prentice-Hall, NJ, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  14. N.M. Fraser, Lessons from the marketplace, Interfaces 24(1994)100–106.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Gallop, Underlying data models and structures for visualization, in: Scientific Visualization, Advances and Challenges, L. Rosenblum et al. eds., Academic Press, London, 1994, pp. 239–250.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A.M. Geoffrion, An introduction to structured modeling, Management Science 33(1987)547–588.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A.M. Geoffrion, Computer-based modeling environments, European Journal of Operational Research 41(1989)33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  18. S.B. Gershwin, An efficient decomposition algorithm for approximate evaluation of tandem queues with finite storage space and blocking, Operations Research 37(1987)291–305.

    Google Scholar 

  19. N. Gershon, From perception to visualization, in: Scientific Visualization, Advances and Challenges, L. Rosenblum et al., eds., Academic Press, London, 1994, pp. 129–139.

    Google Scholar 

  20. H.J. Greenberg and F.H. Murphy, A comparison of mathematical programming modeling systems, Annals of Operations Research 38(1992)177–238.

    Google Scholar 

  21. E. Greenfield, Authoring systems focus on new structure and users, Technical Horizons in Education Journal (August 1990)7–16.

  22. Harvard Business School, National Cranberry Cooperative (Abridged), Harvard Business School, 9-688-122, revised 6/24/91, 1988.

  23. A.C. Hax and H.C. Meal, Hierarchical integration of production planning and scheduling, in: TIMS Studies in Management Science, Vol. 1, Logistics, M. Geisler, ed., North-Holland, New York, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  24. M.H. Hosny, A taxonomy, data representation, and formal language for operations research models, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Waterloo, 1978.

  25. C.V. Jones, An integrated modeling environment based on attributed graphs and graph-grammars, Decision Support Systems 10(1993)255–275.

    Google Scholar 

  26. C.V. Jones, Visualization and optimization, ORSA Journal on Computing 6(1994)221–257.

    Google Scholar 

  27. W.C. Jordan and S.C. Graves, Principles on the benefits of manufacturing flexibility, Management Science (41(1995)577–594.

    Google Scholar 

  28. J. Keiper and T. Wickham-Jones, Designing tools for visualization and optimization, ORSA Journal on Computing 6(1994)273–277.

    Google Scholar 

  29. J.S. Lee, M. Guignard and C.V. Jones, Variations in model formulations, Annals of Operations Research 38(1992)325–357.

    Google Scholar 

  30. K.N. McKay, T.E. Morton and P. Ramnath, Attraction and Aversion in Production Scheduling, TIMS/ORSA, Boston, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  31. K.N. McKay, M1 Reference Manual, Dynasty Computing Inc., Waterloo, Ont., 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  32. J.B. Moore, M1 Guide For Operations Management, Dynasty Computing Inc., Waterloo, Ont., 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  33. B.A. Myers, Demonstrational interfaces: A step beyond direct manipulation, Computer 25(1992) 61–73.

    Google Scholar 

  34. L.A. Neustadter, A. Geoffrion, S. Maturana, T. Tsai and F. Vicuña, The design and implementation of a prototype structured modeling environment, Annals of Operations Research 38(1992)453–484.

    Google Scholar 

  35. D.A. Norman, Cognitive engineering, in: User Centered System Design, D.A. Norman and S.W. Draper, eds., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, NJ, 1986, pp., 31–61.

    Google Scholar 

  36. J. Preece, Y. Rogers, H. Sharp, D. Benyon, S. Holland and T. Carey, Human-Computer Interaction, Addison-Wesley, Wokingham, England, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  37. S. Rathnam and M.V. Mannino, Tools for building the human-computer-interface of a decision support system, Decision Support Systems 13(1995)35–59.

    Google Scholar 

  38. J. Rasmussen, The role of hierarchical knowledge representation in decision making and systems management, IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics SMC-15(1985)234–243.

    Google Scholar 

  39. R. Rubinstein and H. Hersh, The Human Factor — Designing Computer Systems For People, Digital Press, 1984.

  40. B. Shneiderman, Direct manipulation: A step beyond programming languages, Computer 16(1983) 57–69.

    Google Scholar 

  41. K.F. Simpson, In-process inventories, Operations Research 6(1958)863–873.

    Google Scholar 

  42. J.J. Swain, Flexible tools for modeling, OR/MS Today 20(1993)62–78.

    Google Scholar 

  43. E.R. Tufte, The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  44. A. Vazsonyi, Where we ought to be going: The potential of spreadsheets, Interfaces 23(1993) 26–39.

    Google Scholar 

  45. R.F. Vernon, What really happens to complementary textbook software? A case study in software utilization, Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 20(1993)35–38.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Kenneth N. McKay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David B. Kletter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stephen C. Graves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McKay, K.N., Kletter, D.B. & Graves, S.C. OMAC: An environment for modeling and analysis. Annals of Operations Research 72, 241–264 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018900421933

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018900421933

Search

Navigation