Abstract
It has been documented that some tests ofbackground knowledge underpredict the performance offemale students in college. This study explored whetherthe underprediction phenomenon would also be found for a test that tapped four subfields ofgeography. Students (primarily White, N = 315) enrolledin nine geography classes at a comprehensive, midwesternuniversity completed the Knowledge of Geography (KOG) test during the first week of the semester andconsented to release their first exam grades, finalgrades, and ACT scores. Replicating a previous study(Henrie, Aron, Nelson, & Poole, 1997), there were gender differences favoring males across allfour subfields of the KOG test. KOG test scorescorrelated with grades, but males and females achievedcomparable course grades despite the lower performance of females on the KOG test. Examples illustratehow small differences between predicted and actualgrades can translate into large gender discrepancieswhenever minimum scores from tests that underpredict the performance of a subgroup are used toqualify students for educationalopportunities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Affirmative action: The next battlegrounds. (1998, October 30). Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. A32–A37.
American Association of University Women Educational Foundation. (1992). How schools shortchange girls: A study of major findings on girls and education. Washington, DC: Author.
Arenson, K. W. (1998, January 14). A revamped student test reduces the gap between sexes. New York Times, p. B7.
Ben-Shakhar, G., & Sinai, Y. (1991). Gender differences in multiple-choice tests: The role of differential guessing tendencies. Journal of Educational Measurement, 28, 23–35.
Bolger, N., & Kellaghan, T. (1990). Method of me asurement and gender difference s in scholastic achievement. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 165–174.
Bridgeman, B., & Lewis, C. (1994). The relationship of essay and multiple-choice scores with grades in college courses. Journal of Educational Measurement, 31, 37–50.
Byrnes, J. P., & Takahira, S. (1993). Explaining gender differences on SAT-Math items. Developmental Psychology, 29, 805–810.
Gibbons, A. (1996). Facing the big chillin science. Science, 271, 1902–905.
Gose, B. (1997, June 6). Liberal-arts colleges ask: Where have the men gone? Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. A35–A36.
Grossman, W. M. (1998). Access denied. Scientific American, 279, 38.
Guernsey, L., & Healy, P. (1999, January 22). Judge rules that U. of Georgia gave unconstitutional preferences to Black applicants. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A28.
Hall, R. M., & Sandler, B. R. (1982, February). The classro om climate: A chilly one for women? Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges, Project on the Status and Education of Women.
Henrie, R. L., Aron, R. H., Nelson, B. D., & Poole, D. A. (1997). Gender-related knowledge variations within geography. Sex Roles, 36, 605–623.
Kleinfeld, J. (1999). Student performance: Males versus females. Public Interest, 134, 3–20.
Koerner, B. I. (1999, February 8). Where the boys aren't. U.S.News and World Report, pp. 47–55.
Leo, J. (1999, February 22). Gender wars redux. U.S.News and World Report, p. 24.
Morell, V. (1996). Computer culture deffects women and minorities. Science, 271, 1915–1916.
Murphy, R. J. L. (1982). Sex differences in objective test performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 52, 213–219.
National Center for Education Statistics. (1996). Digest of Education Statistics 1996 (NCES96–133). Washington, DC: Author.
National Center for Education Statistics. (1997). Digest of Education Statistics 1997 (NCES98–015). Washington, DC: Author.
Sharps, M. J., Welton, A. L., & Price, J. L. (1993). Gender and task in the determination of spatial cognitive performance. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 17, 71–83.
Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women's math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4–28.
Steele, C. M.,& Aronson, J. (1998). Stereotype threat and the test performance of academically successful African Americans. In C. Jencks & M. Phillips (Eds.), The Black-White test score gap (pp. 401–427). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Toch, T., & Walthall, M. (1997, September 1). The test of merit fails that standard. U.S.News and World Report, pp. 94–95.
Wainer, H., & Steinberg, L. S. (1992). Sex differences in performance on the mathematics section of the Scholastic Aptitude Test: A bidirectional validity study. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 323–336.
Willingham, W. W., Cole, N. S., Lewis, C., & Leung, S. W. (1997). Test performance. In W.W. Willingham & N. S. Cole (Eds.), Gender and fair assessment (pp. 55–126). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nelson, B.D., Aron, R.H. & Poole, D.A. Underprediction of Female Performance from Standardized Knowledge Tests: A Further Example from the Knowledge of Geography Test. Sex Roles 41, 529–540 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018891220536
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018891220536