Skip to main content
Log in

Self-Perception and Deceptive Behavior: The Uniqueness of Feminine Males

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study investigated the relationshipbetween deception and selfperception of traditionallymasculine and feminine characteristics. In the firststage of the study, 730 fifth and sixth graders (377 boys and 353 girls), all Jewish Israelis,completed an adapted form of the BSRI (Bem, 1974). Inthe second stage of the study, 154 boys were given threetypes of questionnaires, one consisting of questions dealing with traditionally masculine topics,the second with traditionally feminine topics, and thethird with neutral topics. Since most of the questionswere very difficult, participants faced failure, but were given an opportunity to deceive andpretend to know more than they really did. It was found,as predicted, that cross-sex males, i.e., those whoself-endorse a large amount of traditionally feminine characteristics and a small amount oftraditionally masculine characteristics, were a uniquegroup. They were the only group who deceived more on thegender-inconsistent than gender-consistent task. The other gender role groups deceived more on thegender-consistent task than on the gender-inconsistenttask, or equally on both tasks. The results arediscussed within the context of the debate over themeaning of self-endorsement of masculine and femininetraits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Archer, J. (1991). A methodological commentary on gender schema research. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 185–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex-typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berndt, T. J., & Heller, K. A. (1986). Gender stereotypes and social interferences: A developmental study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 889–898.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. B., & McCloskey, L. A. (1983–1984). Peers and the maintenance of sex-typed behavior: The development of children' s conceptions of cross-gender behavior in their peers. Social Cognition, 2, 294–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1990). Things I have learnt so far. American Psychologist, 45, 1304–1312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, S. E. & Madson, L. (1997). Elaboration of mode ls of the self: Reply to Baumeister & Sommer (1997)& Martin & Ruble (1997). Psychological Bulletin, 122(1), 51–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dar, R., Serlin, R. C., & Omer, H. (1994). Misuse of statistical tests in three decades of psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 75–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K., Kite, M. D., & Lewis, L. L. (1985). Clustering and gender schema: An uncertain link. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 387–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dienstbier, R. A., & Munter, P. O. (1971). Cheating as a function of the labeling of natural arousal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17, 208–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H. & Mladinic, A. (1989). Gender stereotypes and attitudes toward women and me. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 543–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., Mladinic, A., & Otto, S. (1991). Are women evaluated more favorably than men. An analysis of attitudes, beliefs, and emotions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 203–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagot, B. I. (1977). Consequences of mode rate cross gender behavior in preschool children. Child Development, 48, 902–907.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frable, D. E. S. (1987). Sex-typed execution and perception of expressive movement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 391–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frable, D. E. S. (1989). Sex typing and gender ideology: Two facets of the individual's gender psychology that go together. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 459–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frable, D. E. S. (1993a). Being and feeling unique: Statistical deviance and psychological marginality. Journal of Personality, 61, 85–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frable, D. E. S. (1993b). Dimensions of marginality: Distinctions among those who are different. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 370–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, A. C. (1983). Sex-typing. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (4th ed., Vol. 4, pp. 387–467). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. D., & Gormly, J. (1971). Achievement, sociability and task importance in relation to academic cheating. Psychological Reports, 28, 302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Josephs, R. A., Markus, H. R., & Tafarodi, R. W. (1992). Gender and self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 391–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labott, S. M., Martin, R. B., Eason, P. S., & Berkey, E. Y. (1991). Social reactions to the expression of emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 5, 397–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobel, T. E. (1994). Sex typing and the social perception of gender stereotypic and nonstereotypic behavior: The uniqueness of feminine males. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 379–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobel, T. E., Bempechat, J., Gewirtz, J., Shoken-Topaz, T., & Bach, E. (1993). The role of gender-related information and self endorsement of traits in preadole scents' inferences and judgments. Child Development, 64, 1285–1294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobel, T. E., Gur, S., & Yerushalmi, H. (1989). Cheating behavior of sex-typed and androgynous children in sex-stereotyped and non-sex stereotyped tasks. Journal of Research in Personality, 23, 302–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H., Crane, M., Bernstein, S. L., & Siladi, M. (1982). Self schema and gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1119–1134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C. T. (1984). Self-schemas, gender and social comparison: A clarification of the related attributes hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1222–1229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W. & Gilligan, C. (1964). Delay of gratification, motivation for the prohibited gratification and response to temptation. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology, 69, 411–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, .(1989). Statistical procedures and the justification of knowledge in psychological science. American Psychologist, 44, 1276–1284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T. (1984). Masculinity, femininity and gender related traits: A conceptual analysis and critique of current research. In B. A. Maher, & B. Maher, (Eds.), Progress in Experimental Personality Research, 13, 1–97.

  • Spence, J. T. (1993). Gender related traits and gender ideology: Evidence for a multifactorial theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 624–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitely, B. E. (1983). Sex role orientation and self-esteem: A critical meta-analytic review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 765–778.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lobel, T.E., Rothman, G., Abramovizt, E. et al. Self-Perception and Deceptive Behavior: The Uniqueness of Feminine Males. Sex Roles 41, 577–587 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018847405515

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018847405515

Keywords

Navigation