Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 40, Issue 7–8, pp 617–634 | Cite as

Rape Perceptions as a Function of Gender-Role Traditionality and Victim-Perpetrator Association

  • Kelly Simonson
  • Linda Mezydlo Subich
Article

Abstract

Perceptions of stranger, acquaintance, date, andmarital rape scenarios and their relation to observers'gender-role traditionality were examined. PrimarilyCaucasian (81%)male and female undergraduates reported their reactions to one of four rapescenarios, attitudes toward men's and women's genderroles, and tendency toward a socially desirable responsestyle. The marital rape scenario was characterized less often as rape and considered less violent,less of a violation of the victim's rights and lesspsychologically damaging to the victim as compared tothe other scenarios. Observers holding less traditional gender-role stereotypes perceived rapescenarios overall as more serious and were less likelyto blame the victim. Also, an exploratory regressionanalysis revealed that gender did not add significantly to the prediction of rape perceptions beyondthe contribution of gender-role beliefs.

Keywords

Regressionanalysis Social Psychology Female Undergraduate Marital Rape Rape Scenario 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Acock, A. C., & Ireland, N. K. (1983). Attribution of blame in rape cases: The impact of norm violation, gender, and sex-role attitude. Sex Roles, 9, 179–193.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, W. P., & Cummings, K. (1993). Women's acceptance of rape myths and their sexual experiences. Journal of College Student Development, 34, 53–57.Google Scholar
  3. Beere, C. A., King, D. W., Beere, D. B., & King, L. A. (1984). The Sex-Role Egalitarianism Scale: A measure of attitudes toward equality between the sexes. Sex Roles, 10, 563–576.Google Scholar
  4. Bridges, J. S. (1991). Perceptions of date and stranger rape: A difference in sex role expectations and rape-supportive beliefs. Sex Roles, 24, 291–307.Google Scholar
  5. Bridges, J. S., & McGrail, C. A. (1989). Attributions of responsibility for date and stranger rape. Sex Roles, 21, 273–286.Google Scholar
  6. Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217–230.Google Scholar
  7. Check, J. V. P., & Malamuth, N. M. (1983). Sex role stereotyping and reactions to depictions of stranger versus acquaintance rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 344–356.Google Scholar
  8. Edward, A. L. (1957). The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research. New York: Dryden.Google Scholar
  9. Finkelhor, D., & Yllo, K. (1982). Forced sex in marriage: A preliminary research report. Crime & Delinquency, 28, 459–478.Google Scholar
  10. Freetly, A. J. H., & Kane, E. W. (1995). Men's and women's perceptions of non-consensual sexual intercourse. Sex Roles, 33, 785–802.Google Scholar
  11. Frieze, I. H. (1983). Investigating the causes and consequences of marital rape. Signs, 8, 532–553.Google Scholar
  12. Giacopassi, D. J., & Dull, R. T. (1986). Gender and racial differences in the acce ptance of rape myths within a college population. Sex Roles, 15, 63–75.Google Scholar
  13. Good, G. E., Heppner, M. J., Hillenbrand-Gunn, T. L., & Wang, L. (1995). Sexual and psychological violence: An exploratory study of predictors in college men. Journal of Men's Studies, 59–71.Google Scholar
  14. Hanneke, C. R., Shields, N. M., & McCall, G. J. (1986). Asse ssing the prevalence of marital rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1, 350–362.Google Scholar
  15. Jenkins, M. J., & Dambrot, F. H. (1987). The attribution of date rape: Observer's attitudes and sexual experiences and the dating situation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 875–895.Google Scholar
  16. King, L. A., & King, D. W. (1986). Validity of the Sex-Role Egalitarianism Scale: Discriminating egalitarianism from feminism. Sex Roles, 15, 207–214.Google Scholar
  17. King, L. A., King, D. W., Carter, D. B., Surface, C. R., & Stepanski, K. (1994). Validity of the Sex-Role Egalitarianism Scale: Two replication studies. Sex Roles, 31, 339–348.Google Scholar
  18. Koss, M. P., & Cook, S. L. (1998). Facing the facts: Date and acquaintance rape are significant problems for women. In R. K. Bergen (Ed.), Issues in intimate violence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Koss, M. P., Dinero, T. E., Seibel, C. A., & Cox, S. L. (1988). Stranger and acquaintance rape: Are there differences in the victim's experience? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 1–24.Google Scholar
  20. L'Armand, K., & Pepitone, A. (1982). Judgments of rape: A study of victim-rapist relationship and victim sexual history. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 134–139.Google Scholar
  21. Luginbuhl, J., & Mullin, C. (1981). Rape and responsibility: How and how much is the victim blamed? Sex Roles, 7, 547–559.Google Scholar
  22. MacDonald, A. P., Jr. (1974). Identification and measurement of multidimensional attitudes toward equality between the sexes. Journal of Homosexuality, 1, 165–182.Google Scholar
  23. Mahoney, E. R., Shively, M. D., & Traw, M. (1986). Sexual coercion & assault:Male socialization and female risk. Sexual Coercion & Assault, 1, 2–8.Google Scholar
  24. Muehlenhard, C. L., & Linton, M. A. (1987). Date rape and sexual aggression in dating situations: Incidence and risk factors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 186–196.Google Scholar
  25. Peterson, S. A., & Franzese, B. (1987). Correlates of college men's sexual abuse of women. Journal of College Student Personnel, 28, 223–228.Google Scholar
  26. Russell, D. E. H. (1990). Rape in marriage (2nd ed.). Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Shotland, R. L., & Goodstein, L. (1983). Just because she doesn't want to doesn't mean it's rape: An experime ntally based causal model of the perception of rape in a dating situation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 220–232.Google Scholar
  28. Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. (1972). The Attitudes Toward Women Scale: An objective instrument to measure attitudes toward the rights and roles of women in contemporary society. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 2, 66.Google Scholar
  29. Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. T. (1974). The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: A measure of sex role stereotypes and masculinity-femininity. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 4, 43–44.Google Scholar
  30. Strahan, R., & Gerbasi, K. C. (1972). Short, homogeneous versions of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 191–193.Google Scholar
  31. Sullivan, J. P., & Mosher, D. L. (1990). Acceptance of guided imagery of marital rape as a function of Macho Personality. Violence and Victims, 5, 275–286.Google Scholar
  32. Truman, D. M., Tokar, D. M., & Fischer, A. R. (1996). Dimensions of masculinity: Relations to date-rape supportive attitudes and sexual aggression in dating situations. Journal of Counseling and Development, 74, 555–562.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kelly Simonson
  • Linda Mezydlo Subich

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations