Skip to main content
Log in

How Masculine Ought I Be? Men's Masculinity and Aggression

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Male undergraduates completed the Bem Sex RoleInventory (BSRI) as they are (actual), as others thoughtthey should be (ought), as they thought they should beideally (ideal), and then rated the importance of each item. Discrepancy scores were derivedby subtracting actual from either ought (oughtdiscrepancy) or from ideal (ideal discrepancy) andweighting scores by the importance of each item. BSRImasculine items provided the basis for masculinitydiscrepancies, and filler items, for generaldiscrepancies. With only two or three exceptions,participants were Caucasian. Each man competed againsta bogus competitor on a computer version of the Taylorreaction-time aggression paradigm that yielded a measureof both overt (intensity of the noise blast putativelydelivered to the opponent) and covert (noise blastduration) aggression. Men with high masculine"ought" discrepancies engaged in morecovert-and not more overt — aggression than didlows, an effect not moderated by provocation level.Those with high masculinity scores were more overtly aggressive than werelow masculinity men.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ashmore, R. D., Del Boca, F. K., & Bilder, S. M. (1995). Construction and validation of the Gender Attitude Inventory, a structured inventory to assess multiple dimensions of gender attitudes. Sex Roles, 32, 753–785.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babl, J. D. (1979). Compensatory masculine responding as a function of sex role. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 252–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beal, D. J., O'Neal, E. C. Ong, J., & Ruscher, J. B. (1998). The ways and means of interracial aggression: Modern racists' use of covert retaliation. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Bem, S. L. (1981). Bem sex-role inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, L. (1998). Affective aggre ssion: The role of stress, pain, and negative affect. In R. G. Geen & E. Donnerste in (Eds.), Human aggression: Theories, research, and implications for social policy. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Björkqvist, K. (1994). Sex differences in physical, verbal, and indirect aggression: A review of recent research. Sex Roles, 30, 177–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Björkqvist, K., Osterman, K., & Lagerspetz, K. M. (1994). Sex differences in covert aggression among adults. Aggressive Behavior, 20, 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brain, P. F., & Susman, E. J. (1997). Hormonal aspects of aggression and violence. In D. M. Stoff, J. Breiling, & J.D. Maser (Eds.),Handbook of antisocial behavior. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushman, B. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (in press). Threatened egotism, narcissism, self-esteem, and direct and displaced aggression: Does self-love or self-hate lead to violence? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

  • Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1986). Gender and aggressive behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 309–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, M., & Wood, W. (1992). Sex differences in emotional intensity: A social role explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1010–1022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, D., Langley, T., & O'Neal, E. (1992). Gender role masculinity and angry aggression in women. Sex Roles, 26, 355–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, J., O'Neal, E., & Fox, E. (1971). Magnitude of retaliation as a function of the similarity of available responses to those employed by attacker. Psychonomic Science, 22, 215–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, D. L., & Sirkin, M. (1984). Measuring a macho personality constellation. Journal of Research in Personality, 18, 150–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Österman, K., Börkqvist, K., & Lagerspetz, K. M. J., with Kaukiainen, A., Landau, S. F., Fraczek, A., & Caprara, G. V. (1998). Cross-cultural evidence of female indirect aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 24, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. L., O'Neal, E., Langley, T., & Butcher, A. (1991). Anger arousal, deindividuation, and aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 17, 193–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. P. (1967). Aggressive behavior and physiological arousal as a function of provocation and the tendency to inhibit aggression. Journal of Personality, 35, 297–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, W., Christensen, P. N., Hebl, M. R., & Rothgerber, H. (1997). Conformity to sextyped norms, affect, and the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 423–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zillmann, D. (1979). Hostility and aggression. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weisbuch, M., Beal, D. & O'Neal, E.C. How Masculine Ought I Be? Men's Masculinity and Aggression. Sex Roles 40, 583–592 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018840130646

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018840130646

Keywords

Navigation