Skip to main content

Assessing the Current Validity of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory

Abstract

The Bem Sex-Role Inventory (BSRI) is a widelyused instrument in measuring gender role perceptions.Recent concerns regarding the validity of the adjectiveshave arisen as changes in the roles of men and women have occurred in American society sincethe 1970's. A partial replication of the method that Bem(1974) used to validate the masculine and feminineadjectives comprising the instrument was conducted. All but two of the adjectives were validatedusing Bem's criteria. These findings suggest that theBSRI may still be a valid instrument for assessing genderroles. However, evidence was revealed that traditional masculine and feminine gender role perceptionsmay be weakening. Future validation of the BSRI iswarranted in light of these patterns.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

REFERENCES

  • Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1975). Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 634–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1981). Bem Sex Role Inventory: Professional manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L., & Lenney, E. (1976). Sex typing and the avoidance of cross-sex behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 48–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L., Martyna, W., & Watson, C. (1976). Sex typing and androgyny: Further explorations of the expressive domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 1016–1023.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. L., & Ashworth, C. D. (1977). A replication study of item selection for the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 501–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, J. B., & Range, L. M. (1988). Femininity and reasons for living. Educational and Psychological Research, 8, 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaudreau, P. (1977). Factor analysis of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 299–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glazer, C. A., & Dusek, J. B. (1985). The relationship between sex-role orientation and resolution of Eriksonian developmental crises. Sex Roles, 13, 653–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, R. W., Batlis, N. C., Small, A. C., & Erdwins, C. (1977). Factor structure of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory and the Personal Attributes Questionnaire. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 1122–1124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbrun, A. B. (1968). Sex-role identity in adolescent females: A theoretical paradox. Adolescence, 3, 79–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, C. L., & Ellis, J. B. (1998). Examining gender and gender role differences in attitudes toward abortion and euthanasia. Manuscript in preparation.

  • Holt, C. L., Zinser, O., & Tennyson, J. A. (1998). Gender differences in object recall: The effects of gender-related stimuli and motivation. Manuscript in preparation.

  • Latorre, R. A. (1978). Gender role and psychological adjustment. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 7, 89–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlofsky, J. (1977). Sex-role orientation, identity formation, and self-esteem in college men and women. Sex Roles, 3, 561–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedhazur, E. J., & Tetenbaum, T. J. (1979). Bem Sex-Role Inventory: A theoretical and methodological critique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 996–1016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahan, R. F. (1975). Remarks on Bem's measurement of psychological androgyny: Alternative methods and a supplementary analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 568–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, S., Kimmel, E.B., & Kromrey, J. D. (1995). Revisiting university student gender role perceptions. Sex Roles, 33, 183–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, S., Kromrey, J. D., & Kimmel, E. (1995). University faculty gender roles perceptions. Sex Roles, 32, 407–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Street, S., & Meek, P. (1980). Greek and non-Greek student perceptions of sex roles. Journal of the National Association for Women Deans, Administrators, and Counselors, 43, 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, J. A., Sasek, J., Friedman, A. F., & Bowden, J. D. (1976). Androgyny and other measures of masculinity-femininity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44, 766–770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkup, H., & Abbott, R. D. (1978). Cross-validation of item selection on the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2, 63–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, C. W., Waters, L. K., & Pincus, S. (1977). Factor analysis of masculine and feminine sex-typed items from the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Psychological Reports, 40, 567–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiten, W. (1997). Psychology: Themes and variations, briefer version (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, F. R., & Cook, E. P. (1984). Concurrent validity of four androgyny instruments. Sex Roles, 11, 813–837.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holt, C.L., Ellis, J.B. Assessing the Current Validity of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Sex Roles 39, 929–941 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018836923919

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018836923919

Keywords

  • Social Psychology
  • Gender Role
  • Valid Instrument
  • Partial Replication
  • Feminine Gender