Sex Roles

, Volume 38, Issue 9–10, pp 863–870 | Cite as

Gender Differences in the Structure of Narcissism: A Multi-Sample Analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory

  • Brian T. Tschanz
  • Carolyn C. Morf
  • Charles W. Turner

Abstract

Multi-sample analysis of the Emmons factor modelof the Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI) was usedto test the prediction that exploitive tendencies andfeelings of entitlement are less central to the construct of narcissism among females thanthey are among males. As predicted, the hypothesis ofcross-gender equivalence of the Emmons factorvariance/covariance matrixwas rejected. Follow-upanalyses confirmed thatthis hypothesis was rejectedprimarily because Exploitiveness/Entitlement showedweaker correlations with the other Emmons factors amongfemales that it did among males. Results are discussed in terms of such factors as norms regardingappropriate sex role conduct, as well as the powerdifferential between males and females.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Akhtar, S., & Thompson, J. (1982). Overview: Narcissistic Personality Disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 139, 12-20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 588-606.Google Scholar
  3. Butler, D., & Geis, F. L. (1990). Nonverbal affect responses to male and female leaders: Implications for leadership evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 48-59.Google Scholar
  4. Carli, L. L., Lafleur, S. J., & Loeber, C. C. (1995). Nonverbal behavior, gender, and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1030-1041.Google Scholar
  5. Carroll, L. (1987). A study of narcissism, affiliation, intimacy,and power motives among students in business administration. Psychological Reports, 61, 355-358.Google Scholar
  6. Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3-22.Google Scholar
  7. Emmons, R. A. (1984). Factor analysis and construct validity of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 291-300.Google Scholar
  8. Emmons, R. A. (1987). Narcissism: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 11-17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Haaken, J. (1983). Sex differences in narcissistic disorders. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 43, 315-324.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1990). SPSS LISREL 7 and PRELIS: User's Guide and Reference. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.Google Scholar
  11. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). SPSS LISREL 8: Users reference guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.Google Scholar
  12. McCann, J. T., & Biaggio, M. K.(1989). Narcissistic personality features and self-reported anger. Psychological R Reports, 64, 55-58.Google Scholar
  13. Philipson, I.(1985). Sex and narcissism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 213-228.Google Scholar
  14. Raskin, R., & Hall, C. S. (1979). A narcissistic personality inventory. Psychological Reports, 40, 590.Google Scholar
  15. Raskin, R., & Terry, H. (1988). A principle components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence for its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890-902.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Rhodewalt, F., & Morf, C. C. (1995). Self and interpersonal correlates of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory: A review and new findings. Journal of Research in Personality, 29, 1-23.Google Scholar
  17. United States Bureau of the Census (1990). United States population estimates: 1990. Washington, DC, U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brian T. Tschanz
  • Carolyn C. Morf
  • Charles W. Turner

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations