Abstract
This study tests Fredrickson and Roberts' (1997)assertion that cultural practices of sexuallyobjectifying women's bodies socialize women tointernalize an observer's perspective on their physicalselves. Autobiographical memories can contain imagesfrom two perspectives: the original, first personperspective (field images) and that of an outsideobserver (observer images) (Nigro and Neisser, 1983). We collected autobiographical memories for eventsin general and for specific, potentially objectifyingsituations from a predominantly European-American sampleof 138 female and 104 male students at a private university. Results demonstrated that femaleparticipants reported more observer imagery than maleparticipants both for memories in general and formemories of certain situations wherein women are likely to be sexually objectified. Women's and men'semotional responses to these situations were alsodifferent, with women reporting more negative affect,including shame and anxiety, and less positiveaffect.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
REFERENCES
Barron, R. M.,& Kenny, D. A. (1986).The mode rator-mediator distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
Beauvoir, S. (1952). The second sex(H. M. Parshle y, trans.). New York: Knopf.
Berger, J. (1972). Ways of seein g. London: Penguin.
Berscheid,E., Dion, K., Walster, E., & Walster,G.W. (1971). Physical attractiveness and dating choice: A test of the matching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 173–189.
Cash, T. F., Gillen, B., & Burns, D. S. (1977). Sexism and ``beautyism' ' in personnel consultant decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 301–310.
Eisenberg, N., & Lennon, R. (1983). Sex differences in empath and related capacities. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 100–131.
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R., & Shea, C. (1989). Gender differences in empathy and prosocial moral reasoning: Empirical investigations. In M. M. Brabeck (Ed.). Who cares? Theory, research, and educational implications of the ethic of care. New York: Praeger.
Frank, M. G., & Gilovich, T. (1989). Effect of memory perspective on retrospective causal attributions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 399–403.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory: Towards an understanding of women' s lived experience and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206.
Fredrickson, B. L., Roberts, T., Noll, S. M., Quinn, D. M., & Twenge, J. M. (1998).That swimsuit become s you: Sex difference s in self-objectification, restrained eating and math performance. Journal of Personality an d Social Psychology, 75, 269–284.
Gardner, C. B. (1980). Passing by: Street remarks, address rights, and the urban female. Sociological Inquiry, 50, 328–356.
Garfinkel, P. E., & Garner, D. M. (1982). Anorexianervosa: A multidimensional perspective. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
Heiman, J. R., & Verhulst, J. (1982). Gender and sexual functioning. In I. Al-Issa (Ed.), Genderand psychopathology (pp. 305–320). New York: Academic Press.
Kaschak, E. (1992). Engendered lives: A new psychology of women's experience. New York: Basic Books.
Lewis, M. (1992). Shame: The exposed self. New York: Free Pre ss.
Lorenz, C., & Neisser, U. (1985). Factors of imagery and event recall. Memory and Cognition, 13 494–500.
McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The objectified body consciousness scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215.
Nigro, G., & Neisser, U. (1983). Point of view in personal memories. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 693–702.
Nolen-Hoeksema S. (1990). Sex differences in depression. Stanford, CA: Standford University Press.
Noll, S. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). A mediational mode l linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623–636.
Watson, D., Clark, L.A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huebner, D.M., Fredrickson, B.L. Gender Differences in Memory Perspectives: Evidence for Self-Objectification in Women. Sex Roles 41, 459–467 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018831001880
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018831001880