Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 39, Issue 11–12, pp 873–885 | Cite as

The Hairlessness Norm: The Removal of Body Hair in Women

  • Marika Tiggemann
  • Sarah J. Kenyon
Article

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the frequency andmeaning of the removal of body hair in women.Participants were 129 female university students (meanage = 22.3 years) and 137 female high school students (mean age = 14.3 years). Almost all (>95%)were Caucasian. It was found that, as predicted, the vastmajority (92%) of women remove their leg and/or underarmhair, most frequently by shaving. This was irrespective of their feminist beliefs, but wasnegatively related to self-esteem in university students.The reasons cited for hair removal were primarilyconcerned with a desire for femininity andattractiveness. However, the reasons provided for starting toremove body hair differed between the groups, in thatthey were relatively more normative for the universitystudents than for the high school students. It was concluded that women's stated reasons forstarting the practice of hair removal reflectprimarilytheir vantage point as an observer. In fact, removingbody hair is a practice so normative as to go mostly unremarked, but one which contributessubstantially to the notion that womens' bodies areunacceptable as they are.

Keywords

High School Social Psychology High School Student Vantage Point Stated Reason 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Bachman, J. G., & O'Malley, P. M. (1977). Self-esteem in young men: A longitudinal analysis of the impact of educational and occupational attainment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 365–380.Google Scholar
  2. Basow, S. A. (1991). The hairless ideal: Women and their body hair. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 83–96.Google Scholar
  3. Brewer, W. F. (1988). Memory for randomly sampled autobiographical events. In U. Neisser & E. Winograds (Eds.), Remembering reconsidered: Ecological and traditional approaches to the study of memory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Brewer, W. F. (1994). Autobiographical memory and survey research. In N. Schwartz & S. Sudman (Eds.), Autobiographical memory and the validity of retrospective reports. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  5. Chapkis, W. (1986). Beauty secrets: Women and the politics of experience. London: The Women's Press.Google Scholar
  6. Fallon, A. (1990). Culture in the mirror: Sociocultural determinants of body image. In T. F. Cash & T. Pruzinsky (Eds.), Body images: Development, deviance and change. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  7. Freedman, R. (1986). Beauty bound. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
  8. Henderson, S. N., & Cunningham, J. N. (1993). Women's emotional dependence on men: Scale construction and test of Russianoff's hypothesis. Sex Roles, 28, 317–334.Google Scholar
  9. Hope, C. (1982). Caucasian female body hair and American culture. Journal of American Culture, 5, 93–99.Google Scholar
  10. Lewis, V., Grieve, N., Bell, R., & Bartlett, W. (1989). Measuring attitudes to women: Development of the Women in Society Questionnaire (WSQ). Unpublished manuscript, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  11. Mazur, A. (1986). U.S. trends in feminine beauty and overadaptation. Journal of Sex Research, 22, 281–303.Google Scholar
  12. Rodeheaver, D., & Stohs, J. (1991). The adaptive misperception of age in older women: Sociocultural images and psychological mechanisms of control. Educational Gerontology, 17, 141–156.Google Scholar
  13. Rodin, J. Silberstein, L., & Striegel-Moore. R. (1985). Women and weight: A normative discontent. In T. B. Sonderegger (Ed.), Psychology and gender. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  14. Smith, M., & Walker, I. (1992). The structures of attitudes to a single object: Adopting critical referents theory to measure attitudes to “woman”. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 201–214.Google Scholar
  15. Ussher, J. M. (1989). The psychology of the female body. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Wolf, N. (1990). The beauty myth. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marika Tiggemann
  • Sarah J. Kenyon

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations