Skip to main content
Log in

Graduate Students' Relationships with Their Male and Female Major Professors

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Structured interviews of ten female studentswith male major professors, ten female students withfemale major professors, ten male students with malemajor professors, and ten male students with female major professors were content-analyzed forevidence of differences related to student-professorgender combination. These quantitative and qualitativecontent analyses indicated no differences inprofessional relationships. However, with respect topsychosocial relationships, there were some advantagesto male students and disadvantages to female studentsassociated with having male major professors. Forexample, compared to other gender combinations, femaleswith male major professors made the greatest number ofnegative psychosocial comments and met with their majorprofessors in the fewest number of nonacademic environments. Males with male major professorsmet in the greatestnumber of nonacademic environmentsand placed their major professors on their lists ofsupportive people most often.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aguilar-Gaxiola, S., Norris, R. C., & Carter, F. J. (1984, April). The roles of mentors in the lives of graduate students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 244 529).

  • Barger, R. B., & Mayo-Chamberlain, J. (1983). Advisor and advisee issues in doctoral education. Journal of Higher Education, 54, 407–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronstein, P., Black, L., Pfennig, J., & White, A. (1986). Getting academic jobs: Are women equally qualified-And equally successful? American Psychologist, 41, 318–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, F. J. (1983). Quality of life, adjustment, and stress among graduate students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, George Peabody College for Teachers of Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.

  • Cronan-Hillix, T., Gensheimer, L. K., Cronan-Hillix, W.A., Davidson, W. S. (1986). Students' views of mentors in psychology graduate training. Teaching of Psychology, 13, 123–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Digest of Education Statistics. (1996). National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M. F. (1984). Women and higher education: Sex differentials in the status of students and scholars. In J. Freeman (Ed.), Women: A feminist perspective. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, L. A. (1985). Dimensions of same-gender student-faculty role model relationships. Sex Roles, 12, 111–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, L. A., Gallessich, J. M., & Evans, S. L. (1983). Sex of faculty role model and students' self-perceptions of competency. Sex Roles, 9, 597–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, R. D., & Thorpe, J. S. (1986). Unethical intimacy: A surve y of sexual contact and advances between psychology educators and female graduate students.American Psychologist, 41, 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, E. (1979). Effect of same-sex and cross-sex role models on the subsequent productivity of scholars. American Psychologist, 34, 407–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillemin, J., Holmstrom, L. L., & Garvin, M. (1979). Judging competence: Letters of recommendation for women and men faculties. School Review, 87, 157–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. M., & Sandler, B. R. (1982). The classroom climate: A chilly one for women? Project on the Status and Education of Women. Washington, D.C.: Association of Ame rican Colleges (ERIC Docume nt Reproduction Service No. ED 215 628).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. M., & Sandler, B. R. (1984). Out of the classro om: a chilly campus climate for women? Project on the Status and Education of Women. Washington, DC: Association of Ame rican Colleges (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 254 125).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, K. T. (1991). Loving partnerships: Dealing with sexual attraction and power in doctoral advisement relationships. Journal of Higher Education, 62, 514–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, K. T. (1995). Doctoral advisement relationships between women. Journal of Higher Education, 66, 447–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hite, L. M. (1985). Female doctoral students: Their perceptions and concerns. Journal of College Student Personnel, 26, 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, E. I., & Holmstrom, R. W. (1974). The plight of the woman doctoral student. American Educational Research Journal, 11, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjerulff, K. H., & Blood, M. R. (1973). A comparison of communication patterns in male and female graduate students. Journal of Higher Education, 44, 623–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kram, K. E. (1985). Mentoring at work: Developmental relationships in organizational life. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, J. S. (1990). The origins of sex difference s in science. Social Forces, 68, 1297–1316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maltz, D. N., & Borker, R. A. (1982). A cultural approach to male-female miscommunication. In J. J. Gumperz (Ed.), Language and social identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. M.,& Larrabee, M. J. (1995). Sexual intimacy in counse lor education and supervision: A national survey. Counselor Education and Supervision, 34, 332–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, D. G. (1996). Social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noe, R. A. (1988). An investigation of the determinants of successful assigned mentoring. Personnel Psychology, 41, 457–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reskin, B. F. (1979). Academic sponsorship and scientists' careers. Sociology of Education, 52, 129–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B. E. (1987). Graduate women, sexual harassment, and university policy. Journal of Higher Education, 58, 46–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, D. S., & Mynatt, C. R. (1993). Female graduate students' perceptions of their interactions with male and female major professors. Journal of Higher Education, 64, 555–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuckman, H. (1987). PhD recipients in psychology and biology: Do those with dissertation advisors of the same sex publish scholarly pape rsmore frequently? American Psychologist, 42, 987–992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, R. R., & Webb, R. B. (1990). Qualitative research in education: Focus and methods. Philadelphia, PA: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S., & Castellan, N. J., Jr. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugar, J., & Tracy, C. R. (1989). Is the sex of a dissertation advisor related to a young scientist's rate of publication? American Psychologist, 44, 574–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. (1990). You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. (1994). Talking from 9 to 5:How women's and men's conversational styles affect who gets heard, who gets cred it, and what gets done at work. New York: William Morrow & Co.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schroeder, D.S., Mynatt, C.R. Graduate Students' Relationships with Their Male and Female Major Professors. Sex Roles 40, 393–420 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018819526103

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018819526103

Keywords

Navigation