Skip to main content
Log in

The Meaning of Elements of Reality and Quantum Counterfactuals: Reply to Kastner

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is an answer to the preceding paper by Kastner, in which she continued the criticism of the counterfactual usage of the Aharonov-Bergman-Lebowitz rule in the framework of the time-symmetrized quantum theory, in particular, by analyzing the three-box “paradox.” It is argued that the criticism is not sound. Paradoxical features of the three-box example are discussed. It is explained that the elements of reality in the framework of time-symmetrized quantum theory are counterfactual statements, and therefore, even conflicting elements of reality can be associated with a single system. It is shown how such “counterfactual” elements of reality can be useful in the analysis of a physical experiment (the three-box example). The validity of Kastner's application of the consistent histories approach to the time-symmetrized counterfactuals is questioned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Y. Aharonov, P. G. Bergmann, and J. L. Lebowitz, Phys. Rev. B 134, 1410 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Y. Aharonov and L. Vaidman, Phys. Rev. A 41, 11 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Y. Aharonov and L. Vaidman, J. Phys. A 24, 2315 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  4. N. W. M. Ritchie, J. G. Story, and R. G. Hulet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1107 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. D. Parks et al., Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 454, 2997 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  6. L. Vaidman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3369 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. Vaidman, Found. Phys. 26, 895 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  9. N. D. Mermin, in Potentiality, Entaglement and Passion-at-a-Distance, R. S. Cohen et al., eds. (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1997), pp. 149–157.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. E. Kastner, Stud. Hist. Phil. Mod. Phys., in press (e-print quant-ph/9812024).

  11. D. Albert, Y. Aharonov, and S. D'Amato, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 5 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. E. Kastner, Found. Phys. 29, 851 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  13. L. Vaidman, Stud. Hist. Phil. Mod. Phys., in press (e-print quant-ph/9811092).

  14. D. Lewis, Nous 13, 455 (1979); reprinted in D. Lewis, Philosophical Papers Vol. II (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. B. Griffiths, e-print quant-ph/9805056 (1998).

  16. J. Finkelstein, e-print quant-ph/9811057 (1998).

  17. R. E. Kastner, Stud. Hist. Phil. Mod. Phys. 30, 237 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  18. L. Vaidman, Found. Phys. 29, 755 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. B. Griffiths, J. Stat. Phys. 36, 219 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  20. O. Cohen, Phys. Rev. A 51, 4373 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. S. Bell, in Sixty-Two Years of Uncertainty, A. I. Miller, ed. (Plenum, New York, 1990), p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vaidman, L. The Meaning of Elements of Reality and Quantum Counterfactuals: Reply to Kastner. Foundations of Physics 29, 865–876 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018817227573

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018817227573

Keywords

Navigation