Meta-analyses of 43 published studies comparingadult women's and men's interruptions duringconversations were conducted. Combined significancelevels and combined effect sizes were analyzed. Acrossstudies, men were significantly more likely than womento use interruptions. This difference, however, wasassociated with a negligible effect size (d = .15). Amore substantial effect size (d = .33) was found when studies looking specifically at intrusive typesof interruption were analyzed separately. Othermoderator variables were found to be related to gendereffects on the use of intrusive interruptions. Most notably, reports of gender differences inintrusive interruptions were more likely and larger inmagnitude when either women (versus men) were firstauthors, participants were observed in naturalistic(versus laboratory) settings, or participants wereobserved interacting in groups of three or more persons(versus in dyads). These results lend support to acontextual-interactive model of gender that emphasizes the importance of situational moderators ongender-related variations in social behavior.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Aries, E. (1996). Men and women in interaction: Reconsidering the difference. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bakeman, R., & Quera, V. (1995). Analyzing interaction: Sequential analysis with SDIS and GSEQ. New York: Cambridge University.
Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1986). Observing interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beall, A. E. (1993). A social constructionist view of gender. In A. E. Beall & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender. New York: Guilford Press.
Beattie, G. (1977). The dynamics of interruption and the filled pause. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 16, 283–284.
*Beattie, G. W. (1981). Interruption in conversational interaction and its relation to the sex and status of the interactants. Linguistics, 19, 5–35.
*Bilous, F. R., & Krauss, R. M. (1988). Dominance and accommodation in the conversational behaviors of same-and mixed-gender dyads. Language and Communication, 8, 183–194.
*Bohn, E., & Stutman, R. (1983). Sex role differences in the relational control dimension of dyadic interaction. Women's Studies in Communication, 6, 965–104.
*Brooks, V. R. (1982). Sex differences in student dominance behavior in female and male professors' classrooms. Sex Roles, 8, 683–690.
Campbell, K. E., Kleim, D. M., & Olson, K. R. (1992). Conversational activity and interruptions among men and women. The Journal of Social Psychology, 132, 419–421.
*Carli, L. L. (1990). Gender, language, and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 941–951.
*Case, S. S. (1988). Cultural differences, not deficiencies: An analysis of managerial women's language. In S. Rose & L. Larwood (Eds.), Women's careers: Pathways and pitfalls. New York: Praeger.
Chambliss, C. A., & Feeny, N. (1992). Effect of sex of subject, sex of interrupter, and topic of conversation on the perceptions of interruptions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75, 1235–1241.
Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (rev. ed.). New York: Academic Press.
*Craig, D., & Pitts, M. K. (1990). The dynamics of dominance in tutorial discussion. Linguistics, 28, 125–138.
Crawford, M. (1995). Talking difference: On gender and language. London: Sage.
*Dabbs, J. M., Jr., & Ruback, R. B. (1984). Vocal patterns in male and female groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 518–525.
*De Boer, M. (1987). Sex differences in language: Observations of dyadic conversations between members of the same sex. In D. Brouwer & D. de Haan (Eds.), Women's language, socialization and self-image. Providence, RI: Foris.
Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369–389.
*Dindia, K. (1987). The effects of sex of subject and sex of partner on interruptions. Human Communication Research, 13, 345–371.
Drass, K. A. (1986). The effect of gender identity on conversation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 49, 294–301.
Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (1981). Sex of researchers and sex-typed communications as determinants of sex differences in influenceability: A meta-analysis of social influence studies. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 1–20.
*Eakins, B., & Eakins, R. G. (1976). Verbal turn-taking and exchanges in faculty dialogue. In B. L. Dubois & I. M. Crouch (Eds.), The sociology of the languages of American women. San Antonio, TX: Trinity University.
*Fallon, J., & Guo, D. (1994). The relationship between topic familiarity and conversational dominance. Psychology, a Journal of Human Behavior, 31, 53–57.
Ferguson, N. (1977). Simultaneous speech, interruptions and dominance. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 16, 295–302.
*Frances, S. J. (1979). Sex differences in nonverbal behavior. Sex Roles, 5, 519–535.
Goldberg, J. A. (1990). Interrupting the discourse on interruptions: An analysis in terms of relationally neutral, power-and rapport-oriented acts. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 883–903.
Hall, J. A. (1978). Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 845–857.
Hawkins, K. (1991). Some consequences of deep interruption in task-oriented communication. Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 10, 185–203.
Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 139–155.
Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (1988). Gender differences in verbal ability: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 53–69.
James, D., & Clarke, S. (1992). Interruptions, gender, and power: A critical review of the literature. In K. Hall, M. Bucholtz, & B. Moonwoman (Eds.), Locating power: Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Women and Language Conference. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group.
James, D., & Clarke, S. (19930). Women, men, and interruptions: A critical review. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Gender and conversational interaction. New York: Oxford University Press.
*Johnson, C. (1994). Gender, legitimate authority, and leader-subordinate conversations. American Sociological Review, 59, 122–135.
*Jones, E. S., & Gallois, C., Callan, V. J., & Barker, M. (1995). Language and power in an academic context: The effects of status, ethnicity, and sex. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 14, 434–461.
*Kennedy, C. W., & Camden, C. (1983). A new look at interruptions. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 47, 45–58.
*Kollock, P., Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1985). Sex and power in interaction: Conversational privileges and duties. American Sociological Review, 50, 34–46.
*LaFrance, M., & Carmen, B. (1980). The nonverbal display of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 38, 36–49.
Leaper, C. (1994). Exploring the consequences of gender segregation on social relationships. In C. Leaper (Ed.), Childhood gender segregation: Causes and consequences (New Directions for child Development, No. 65). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Leaper, C., & Anderson, K. J. (1997). Gender development and heterosexual romantic relationships during adolescence. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & S. Shulman & W. A. Collins (Issue Eds.), Romantic relationships in adolescence: Developmental perspectives (New Directions for Child Development, No. 78). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Leaper, C., Anderson, K. J., & Sanders, P. (1998). Moderators of gender effects on parents' talk to their children: A meta-analysis. Developmental Psychology, 34, 3–27.
*Leet-Pellegrini, H. M. (1980). Conversational dominance as a function of gender and expertise. In H. Giles, W. P. Robinson, & P. M. Smith (Eds.), Language: Social psychological perspectives. New York: Pergamon Press.
*Leffler, A., Gillespie, D., & Conaty, J. C. (1982). The effects of status differentiation on nonverbal behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 153–161.
*Makri-Tsilipakou, M. (1994). Interruption revisited: Affiliative vs. disaffiliative intervention. Journal of Pragmatics, 21, 401–426.
*Marche, T. A., & Peterson, C. (1993). The development and sex-related use of interruption behavior. Human Communication Research, 19, 388–408.
*Margolin, G., & Wampold, B. E. (1981). Sequential analysis of conflict and accord in distressed and nondistressed marital partners. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 49, 554–567.
*Martin, J. N., & Craig, R. T. (1983). Selected linguistic sex differences during initial social interactions of same-sex and mixed-sex student dyads. The Western Journal of Speech Communication, 47, 16–28.
*McLachlan, A. (1991). The effects of agreement, disagreement, gender and familiarity on patterns of dyadic interaction. Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 10, 199–213.
McLaughlin, M. L. (1984). Conversation: How talk is organized. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
*McMillan, J. R., Clifton, A. K., McGrath, D., & Gale, W. S. (1977). Women's language: Uncertainty, or interpersonal sensitivity and emotionality? Sex Roles, 3, 545–559.
Mott, H., & Petrie, H. (1995). Workplace interactions: Women's linguistic behavior. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 14, 324–336.
Mullen, B. (1989). Advanced BASIC meta-analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Murata, K. (1994). Intrusive or co-operative? A cross-cultural study of interruption. Journal of Pragmatics, 21, 385–400.
Murray, S. O., & Covelli, L. H. (1988). Women and men speaking at the same time. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 103–111.
*Natale, M., Entin, E., & Jaffe, J. (1979). Vocal interruptions in dyadic communication as a function of speech and social anxiety. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 37, 865–878.
*Nemeth, C., Endicott, J., & Wachtler, J. (1976). From the '50s to the '70s: Women in jury deliberations. Sociometry, 39, 293–304.
*Ng, S. H., Brook, M., & Dunne, M. (1995). Interruption and influence in discussion groups. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 14, 369–381.
*Nohara, M. (1992). Sex differences in interruption. An experimental reevaluation. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 21, 127–146.
*Redeker, G., & Maes, A. (1996). Gender differences in interruptions. In D. I. Slobin, J. Gerhardt, A. Kyratzis, & J. Guo (Eds.), Social interaction, social context, and language: Essays in honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rim, Y. (1977). Personality variables and interruptions in small discussion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 247–251.
Robinson, L. F., & Reis, H. T. (1989). The effects on interruption, gender and status on interpersonal perceptions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 13, 141–153.
*Roger, D., Nesshoever, W. (1987). Individual differences in dyadic conversational strategies: A further study. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 247–255.
*Roger, D. B., & Schumacher, A. (1983). Effects of individual differences on dyadic conversational strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 700–705.
*Rogers, W. T., & Jones, S. E. (1980). Effects of dominance tendencies on floor holding and interruption behavior in dyadic interaction. Human Communication Research, 1, 113–122.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.
*Shaw, M. E., & Sadler, O. W. (1965). Interaction patterns in heterosexual dyads varying in degree of intimacy. Journal of Social Psychology, 66, 345–351.
*Simkins-Bullock, J., & Wildman, B. G. (1991). An investigation into the relationships between gender and language. Sex Roles, 24, 149–160.
*Smeltzer, L. R., & Watson, K. W. (1986). Gender differences in verbal communication during negotiations. Communication Research Reports, 3, 74–79.
*Smith, H. W. (1977). Small group interaction at various ages: Simultaneous talking and interruptions of others. Small Group Behavior, 8, 65–74.
Smith-Lovin, L., & Brody, C. (1989). Interruptions in group discussions: The effects of gender and group composition. American Sociological Review, 54, 424–435.
*Street, R. L., Jr., & Murphy, T. L. (1987). Interpersonal orientation and speech behavior. Communication Monographs, 54, 42–62.
Tannen, D. (1983). When is an overlap not an interruption? One component of conversational style. In R. J. DePietro, W. Frawley, & A. Wedel (Eds.), The first Delaware Symposium on Language Studies. Newark, DE: University of Delaware Press.
Tannen, D. (1994). Interpreting interruption in conversation. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Gender and discourse. New York: Oxford.
Thimm, C., Rademacher, U., & Kruse, L. (1995). “Power-related talk”: Control in verbal interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 14, 382–407.
Thomas, A. P., Roger, D., & Bull, P. (1983). A sequential analysis of informal dyadic conversation using Markov chains. British Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 177–188.
*Trimboli, C., & Walker, M. B. (1984). Switching pauses in cooperative and competitive conversations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 297–311.
*Welkowitz, J., Bond, R. N., & Feldstein, S. (1984). Conversational time patterns of Japanese-American adults and children in same and mixed-gender dyads. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 3, 127–138.
*West, C., & Zimmerman, D. (1983). Small insults: A study of interruptions in cross-sec conversations between unacquainted person. In B. Thorne, C. Kramarae, & N. Henley (Eds.), Language, gender and society. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Willis, F. N., & Williams, S. J. (1976). Simultaneous talking in conversation and sex of speakers. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 43, 1067–1070.
Wood, W., & Karten, S. J. (1986). Sex differences in interaction style as a product of perceived sex differences in competence. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 50, 341–347.
Woods, N. (1989). Talking shop: Sex and status as determinants of floor apportionment in a work setting. In J. Coates & D. Cameron (Eds.), Women in their speech communities. New York: Longman.
Zimmerman, D. H., & West, C. (1975). Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation. In B. Thorne & N. Henley (Eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
About this article
Cite this article
Anderson, K.J., Leaper, C. Meta-Analyses of Gender Effects on Conversational Interruption: Who, What, When, Where, and How. Sex Roles 39, 225–252 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018802521676
- Gender Difference
- Combine Effect
- Social Psychology
- Social Behavior
- Negligible Effect