Skip to main content
Log in

CHANGING PERSPECTIVES ON STUDENT RETENTION: A Role for Institutional Research

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a role for institutional research in changing institutional attitudes about the priority placed on student retention efforts. Problems associated with changing perspectives are described using Kuber-Ross's work On Death and Dying. Potential barriers associated with changing the status of student retention efforts within the institution are identified relative to her stages of grief-denial, hostility, bargaining, depression, and acceptance. Tactics useful in addressing and moving through each stage are described. Results from several studies on student retention provide information that has been used to promote and change attitudes toward student retention efforts at all levels at Virginia Tech.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Beaghen, M. A., Brozovsky, P. V., and McLaughlin, G. W. (1996). Explaining grades in individual courses. Paper presented at the Southern Association for Institutional Research. Mobile, Alabama.

  • Braxton, J. M., Vesper, N., and Hossler, D. (1995). Expectations for college and student persistence. Research in Higher Education36(5): 595–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clagget, C. (1992). Enrollment management. In M. A. Whitney, J. D. Porter, and R. H. Fenske (eds.), The Primer for Institutional Research. Resources for Institutional Research7, pp. 12–24. Tallahassee: Association for Institutional Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, T. M., and Murrell, P. H. (1993). Turning Teaching into Learning: The Role of Student Responsibility in the Collegiate Experience(ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 8). Washington, DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, A. M. (1997). The role of institutional research in higher education: enabling researchers to meet new challenges. Research in Higher Education38(1): 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, R. R. (ed.) (1995). Making enrollment management work. New Directions for Student Services71.

  • Ethington, C. A., and Polizzi, T. B. (1996). An assessment of the construct validity of the CCSEQ Quality of Effort Scales. Research in Higher Education37(6): 711–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewell, P. T. (1987). Principles of longitudinal enrollment analysis: conducting retention and student flow studies. In G. W. McLaughlin and J. A. Muffo (eds.), A Primer on Institutional Researchpp. 1–19. Tallahassee: Association for Institutional Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewell, P. T. (ed.) (1988). Implementing assessment: Some organizational issues. New Directions for Institutional Research59.

  • Ewell, P. T. (1993). Retention and enrollment management. In W. R. Fendley, Jr., and L. T. Seeloff (eds.), Reference Sources: An Annotated Bibliography, pp. 85–91. Tallahassee: Association for Institutional Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewell, P. T. (ed.) (1995). Student tracking: New techniques, new demands. New Directions for Institutional Research87.

  • Hossler, D. (ed.) (1991). Evaluating student recruitment and retention programs. New Directions for Institutional Research70.

  • Hossler, D., Bean, J. P., and Associates (1990). The Strategic Management of College Enrollments. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinnick, M. K., and Ricks, M. F. (1993). Student retention: Moving from numbers to action. Research in Higher Education34(1): 55–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubler-Ross, E. (1993). On Death and Dying: What the Dying Have to Teach Doctors, Nurses, Clergy, and Their Own Families. New York: Macmillan (originally published in 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, G. W., and McLaughlin, J. S. (1989). Barriers to information use: The organizational context. New Directions for Institutional Research64: 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, G. W., McLaughlin, J. S., and Howard, R. (1987). Decision support in the information age. New Directions for Institutional Research55: 81–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middaugh, M. F. (1992). Persistence. In M. A. Whitney, J. D. Porter, and R. H. Fenske (eds.), The Primer for Institutional Research. Resources for Institutional Research7, pp. 1–11. Tallahassee: Association for Institutional Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace, C. R. (1979). Measuring Outcomes of College: Fifty Years of Findings and Recommendations for the Future. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E., and Terenzini, P. (1991). How College Affects Students. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terenzini, P. T. (1987). Studying student attrition and retention. In G. W. McLaughlin and J. A. Muffo (eds.), A Primer on Institutional Research, pp. 20–35. Tallahassee: Association for Institutional Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terenzini, P. T. (1993). On the nature of institutional research and the knowledge and skills it requires. Research in Higher Education34(1): 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mclaughlin, G.W., Brozovsky, P.V. & Mclaughlin, J.S. CHANGING PERSPECTIVES ON STUDENT RETENTION: A Role for Institutional Research. Research in Higher Education 39, 1–17 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018779611043

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018779611043

Keywords

Navigation