Advertisement

Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 27, Issue 6, pp 561–580 | Cite as

Sexual Harassment: Identifying Risk Factors

  • Elizabeth A. O'Hare
  • William O'Donohue
Article

Abstract

A new model of the etiology of sexual harassment,the four-factor model, is presented and compared with several models of sexual harassment including the biological model, the organizational model, the sociocultural model,and the sexrole spillover model. A number of risk factors associated with sexually harassing behavior are examined within the framework of the four-factor model of sexual harassment. These include characteristics of the work environment (e.g., sexist attitudes among co-workers, unprofessional work environment, skewed sex ratios in the workplace, knowledge of grievance procedures for sexual harassment incidents) as well as personal characteristics of the subject (e.g., physical attractiveness, job status, sexrole). Subjects were 266 university female faculty, staff, and students who completed the Sexual Experience Questionnaire to assess the experience of sexual harassment and a questionnaire designed to assess the risk factors stated above. Results indicated that the four-factor model is a better predictor of sexual harassment than the alternative models. The risk factors most strongly associated with sexual harassment were an unprofessional environment in the workplace, sexist atmosphere, and lack of knowledge about the organization's formal grievance procedures.

SEXUAL HARASSMENT RISK SEXISM ATTRACTIVENESS SEXROLE 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 42: 155–162.Google Scholar
  2. Cammaert, L. (1985). How widespread is sexual harassment on campus? Int. J. Women's Stud. 8: 399–397.Google Scholar
  3. Dansky, B. S., and Kilpatrick, D. G. (1997). Effects of sexual harassment. In O'Donohue, W. T. (ed.), Sexual Harassment: Theory, Research and Treatment, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, pp. 152–174.Google Scholar
  4. Ellis, S., Barak, A., and Pinto, A. (1991). Moderating effects of personal cognitions on experienced and perceive d sexual harassment of women at the workplace. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 21: 1320–1337.Google Scholar
  5. Farley, L. (1978). Sexual Shaked own: The Sexual Harassment of Women on the Job, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Finkelhor, D. (1984). Child Sexual Abuse: New Theory and Research, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Fitzgerald, L. F., and Ormerod, A. J. (1991). Perceptions of sexual harassment: The influence of gender and academic context. Psychol. Women Quart. 15: 281–294.Google Scholar
  8. Fitzgerald, L. F. and Shullman, S. L. (1993). Sexual harassment: A research analysis and agenda for the 1990's. J. Vocat. Behav. 42: 5–27.Google Scholar
  9. Fitzgerald, L. F., Shullman, S., Bailey, N., Richards, M., Swecker, J., Gold, Y., Ormerod, A. J., and Weitzman, L. (1988). The incidence and dimensions of sexual harassment in academia and the workplace. J. Voc. Behav. 32: 152–175.Google Scholar
  10. Fowler, F. J., Jr. (1988). Survey Research Methods, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.Google Scholar
  11. Gelfand, M. J., Fitzgerald, L. F., and Drasgow, F. (1993). The structure of sexual harassment: A confirmatory analysis across cultures and settings. Under review.Google Scholar
  12. Gruber, J. E. (1990). Methodological problems and policy implications in sexual harassment research. Population Res. Polit. Rev. 9: 235–254.Google Scholar
  13. Gruber, J. E. (1997). An epidemiology of sexual harassment: Evidence from North American and Europe. In O'Donohue, W. (ed.), Sexual Harassment, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, pp. 152–174.Google Scholar
  14. Gutek B. A. (1985) Sex and the Workplace. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  15. Gutek, B. A., and Dunwoody, V. (1988). Understanding sex and the workplace. In Stromberg, A. H., Larwood, L., and Gutek, B. A. (eds.), Women and Work: An Annual Review, Vol. 2, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.Google Scholar
  16. Gutek, B. A., and Koss, M. P. (1993). Changed women and changed consequences of and coping with sexual harassment. J. Vocat. Behav. 42: 28–48.Google Scholar
  17. Gutek B. A., and Morasch, B. (1982). Sex-ratios, sex-role spillover, and sexual harassment of women at work. J. Soc. Issues, 38: 55–74.Google Scholar
  18. Lafontiane, E., and Tredeau, L. (1986). The frequency, source s, and correlates of sexual harassment among women in traditional male occupations. Sex Roles, 15: 433–41.Google Scholar
  19. Loy, P. H., and Stewart, L. P. (1984). The extent and effects of the sexual harassment of working women. Soc. Focus 17: 31–43.Google Scholar
  20. MacKinnon, C. (1979) Sexual Harassment of Working Women: A Case of Sex Discrimination, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
  21. Powell, G. N. (1986). Effects of sex role identity and sex on definitions of sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 14(1,2): 9–19.Google Scholar
  22. Rand, C. S., and Hall, J. A. (1983). Sex difference s in the accuracy of self-perceived attractiveness. Soc. Psychol. Quart. 46: 359–363.Google Scholar
  23. Scheidner, K. T., and Swan, S. (1994). Job-related, psychological, and health-related outcomes of sexual harassment, Paper presented at the Ninth Annual Conference of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
  24. Tangri, S. S., Hayes, S. M. (1997). Theories of sexual harassment. In O'Donohue, W. (ed.), Sexual Harassment, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, pp. 112–129.Google Scholar
  25. Tangri, S. S., Burt, M. R., and Johnson, L. B. (1982). Sexual harassment at work: Three explanatory models. J. Soc. Issues 38: 33–54.Google Scholar
  26. United States Merit Systems Protection Board (1981). Sexual Harassment in the Federal Workplace: Is It a Problem? U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  27. Vaux, A. (1993). Paradigmatic assumptions in sexual harassment research: Being guided without being misled. Special issue: Sexual harassment in the workplace. J. Vocat. Behav. 42: 116–135.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth A. O'Hare
  • William O'Donohue

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations