Sex Roles

, Volume 38, Issue 1–2, pp 45–62 | Cite as

The Impact of Sex and Gender Role Self-Perception on Affective Reactions to Different Types of Film

  • Mary Beth Oliver
  • Stephanie Lee Sargent
  • James B. III Weaver


To what extent do differences in biologicalsexand psychological gender identity influence affectivereactions to different genres of film? In order toaddress this question, this investigation examined the impact of sex and gender roleself-perceptions on viewers' responses to neutral,melodramatic, and violent film segments. Working with apredominantly Caucasian population (93% Caucasian) at asoutheastern university, the results emphasize theimportance of sex and gender role self-perceptions onviewers' affective responses to media entertainment. Theimplications of these findings are discussed.


Social Psychology Gender Role Gender Identity Caucasian Population Affective Response 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allen, J. G., & Haccoun, D. M. (1976). Sex differences in emotionality: A multidimensional approach. Human Relations, 29, 711–722.Google Scholar
  2. Antill, J. R. (1987). Parents beliefs and values about sex roles, sex differences, and sexuality: Their sources and implications. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 294–328.Google Scholar
  3. Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence: An essay on psychology and religion. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  4. Basow, S. A. (1986). Gender stereotypes: Traditions and alternatives (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  5. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.Google Scholar
  6. Bem, S. L. (1976). Probing the promise of androgyny. In A. G. Kaplan & J. P. Bean (Eds.), Beyond sex-role stereotypes: Readings toward a psychology of androgyny. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  7. Bem, S. L. (1985). Androgyny and gender schema theory: A conceptual and empirical integration. In T. B. Sonderegger (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Vol. 32, Psychology of gender. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bem, S. L. (1987). Probing the promise of androgyny. In: M. R. Walsh (Ed.), The psychology of women: Ongoing debates. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Birnbaum, D. W., Nosanchuk, T. A., & Croll, W. L. (1980). Children's stereotypes about sex differences in emotionality. Sex Roles, 6, 435–443.Google Scholar
  11. Brody, L. R. (1993). On understanding gender differences in the expression of emotion: Gender roles, socialization, and language. In S. L. Ablon, D. Brown, E. J. Khantzian, & J. E. Mack (Eds.), Human feelings: Explorations in affect development and meaning. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Brody, L. R., & Hall, J. A. (1993). Gender and emotion. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  13. Broverman, I., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. (1972). Sex role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 59–78.Google Scholar
  14. Cantor, J., & Reilly, S. (1982). Adolescents' fright reactions to television and films. Journal of Communication, 32, 87–99.Google Scholar
  15. Cook, E. P. (1985). Psychological androgyny. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  16. Davis, D. M. (1990). Portrayals of women in prime-time network television: Some demographic characteristics. Sex Roles, 23, 325–333.Google Scholar
  17. Davis, M. H., Hull, J. G., Young, R. D., & Warren, G. G. (1987). Emotional reactions to dramatic film stimuli: The influence of cognitive and emotional empathy. Journal of Personality Psychology and Social Psychology, 52, 126–133.Google Scholar
  18. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  19. Eisenberg, N., & Lennon, R. (1983). Sex differences in empathy and related capacities. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 100–131.Google Scholar
  20. Epstein, C. F. (1988). Deceptive distinctions: Sex, gender, and the social order. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Feshbach, N. D., & Roe, K. (1968). Empathy in six-and seven-year-olds. Child Development, 39, 133–145.Google Scholar
  22. Frueh, T., & McGhee, P. E. (1975). Traditional sex role development and amount of time spent watching television. Developmental Psychology, 111, 109.Google Scholar
  23. Frable, D. E. S. (1989). Sex typing and gender ideology: Facets of the individual's gender psychology that go together. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 95–108.Google Scholar
  24. Frable, D. E. S., & Bem, S. L. (1985). If you are gender schematic, all members of the opposite sex look alike. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 459–468.Google Scholar
  25. Frieze, I. H., Parsons, J. E., Johnson, P. B., Ruble, D. N., & Zellman, G. L. (1978). Women and sex roles: A social psychological perspective. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  26. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1986). Living with television: The dynamics of the cultivation process. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Perspectives on media effects. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  27. Hoffner, C., & Cantor, J. (1991). Perceiving and responding to mass media characters. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Responding to the screen: Reception and reaction processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  28. Huynh, H., & Feldt, L. S. (1970). Conditions under which mean square ratios in repeated measurement designs have exact F-distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65, 1582–1589.Google Scholar
  29. Jeffres, L. W. (1994). Mass media processes (2nd ed.). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.Google Scholar
  30. Lombardo, W. K., Cretser, G. A., Lombardo, B., & Mathis, S. (1983). Fer cryin' out loud—There is a sex difference. Sex Roles, 9, 987–995.Google Scholar
  31. Mundorf, N., Weaver, J., & Zillmann, D. (1989). Effects of gender roles and self perceptions on affective reactions to horror films. Sex Roles, 20, 655–673.Google Scholar
  32. O'Brien, R. G., & Kaiser, M. K. (1985). MANOVA method for analyzing repeated measures designs: An extensive primer. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 316–333.Google Scholar
  33. Oliver, M. B. (1993). Exploring the paradox of the enjoyment of sad films. Human Communication Research, 19, 315–342.Google Scholar
  34. Oliver, M. B., Weaver, J. B., III, & Sargent, S. L. (1997). An Examination of Factors Related to Sex Differences in Enjoyment of Sad Films. Paper submitted for publication, Auburn University.Google Scholar
  35. Richards, J., & Sheridan, D. (1987). Mass observation at the movies. London: Routledge & Kegan.Google Scholar
  36. Richendoller, N. R., & Weaver, J. B., III (1994). Exploring the links between personality and empathic response style. Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 303–311.Google Scholar
  37. Sapolsky, B. S., & Molitor, F. (1996). Content trends in contemporary horror films. In J. B. Weaver, III & R. Tamborini (Eds.), Horror films: Current research on audience preferences and reactions. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  38. Shields, S. A. (1987). Women, men, and the dilemma of emotion. In P. Shaver & C. Hendrick (Eds.), Review of personality and social psychology: Vol. 7. Sex and gender. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Sparks, G. G. (1986). Developing a scale to assess cognitive responses to frightening films. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 30, 65–73.Google Scholar
  40. Spence, J. (1984). Masculinity, femininity, and gender-related traits: A conceptual analysis and critique of current research. In B. A. Maher & W. B. Maher (Eds.), Progress in experimental personality research (Vol. 13). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  41. Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity & femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, & antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  42. Staley, A. A., & O'Donnell, J. P. (1984). A developmental analysis of mothers' reports of normal children's fears. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 144, 165–178.Google Scholar
  43. Tamborini, R., & Mettler, J. (1990, November). Emotional reactions to film: A model of empathic processes. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Speech Communication Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  44. Tamborini, R., & Stiff, J. (1987). Predictors of horror film attendance and appeal: An analysis of the audience for frightening films. Communication Research, 14, 415–436.Google Scholar
  45. Tamborini, R., Stiff, J., & Heidel, C. (1990). Reacting to graphic horror: A model of empathy and emotional behavior. Communication Research, 17, 616–640.Google Scholar
  46. Tamborini, R., Stiff, J., & Zillmann, D. (1987). Preference for graphic horror featuring male versus female victimization: Personality and past film viewing experiences. Human Communication Research, 13, 529–552.Google Scholar
  47. Tannenbaum, P. H., & Gaer, E. P. (1965). Mood change as a function of stress of protagonist and degree of identification in a film-viewing situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 612–616.Google Scholar
  48. Thompson, T. L., & Zerbinos, E. (1995). Gender roles in animated cartoons: Has the picture changed in 20 years? Sex Roles, 32, 651–673.Google Scholar
  49. Vasey, M. W., & Thayer, J. F. (1987). The continuing problem of false positives in repeated measures ANOVA in psychophysiology: A multivariate solution. Psychophysiology, 24, 479–486.Google Scholar
  50. Weaver, J. B., III (1991a). Exploring the links between personality and media preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 1293–1299.Google Scholar
  51. Weaver, J. B., III (1991b). Are “slasher” horror films sexually violent? A content analysis. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 35, 385–392.Google Scholar
  52. Weaver, J. B., III, Brosius, H. B., & Mundorf, N. (1993). Personality and movie preferences: A comparison of American and German audiences. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 307–315.Google Scholar
  53. Zillmann, D. (1991). Empathy: Affect from bearing witness to the emotions of others. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Responding to the screen: Reception and reaction processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  54. Zillmann, D., & Weaver, J. B., III (1996). Horror, gender roles, and the socialization of affect. In J. B. Weaver, III & R. Tamborini (Eds.), Horror films: Current research on audience preferences and reactions. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  55. Zillmann, D., Weaver, J. B., Mundorf, N., & Aust, C. F. (1986). Effects of an opposite-gender companion's affect to horror on distress, delight, and attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 586–594.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary Beth Oliver
  • Stephanie Lee Sargent
  • James B. III Weaver

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations