Skip to main content
Log in

Dissimulation in Phallometric Testing of Rapists' Sexual Preferences

  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sexual preferences of 38 rapists were assessedphallometrically with and without a semantic trackingtask in a counterbalanced design. Four categories ofaudiotaped vignettes describing neutral interactions, consenting sex, rape, and nonsexual violencewere employed as stimuli. In the semantic tracking task,participants were instructed to press one button whenviolent events were described in the vignette and another when sexual activities weredescribed. Phallometric assessment with the semantictask better discriminated between rapists andnon-sex-offender participants (from an earlier study)than the same assessment without the task. Among fourrapists who had previous experience with phallometrictesting, there was a very strong correlation betweendeviance scores and tracking accuracy. Results suggest that the semantic task may improve discriminantvalidity, particularly among sex offenders who have hadprevious experience with phallometricassessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Abel, G. G., Barlow, D. H., Blanchard, E. B., and Mavissakalian, M. (1975). Measurement of sexual arousal in male homosexuals: Effects of instructions and stimulus modality. Arch. Sex. Behav. 4: 623–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, H. E., Motsinger, P., McAnulty, R. D., and Moore, A. L. (1992). Voluntary control of penile tumescence among homosexual and heterosexual subjects. Arch. Sex. Behav. 21: 17–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bancroft, J. H., and Mathews, A. (1967). Penis plethysmography: Its physiological basis and clinical application. Acta. Med. Psychosom. 3: 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaplin, T. C., Rice, M. E., and Harris, G. T. (1995). Salient victim suffering and the sexual responses of child molesters. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 63: 249–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freund, K. (1961). Laboratory differential diagnosis of homo-and heterosexuality—An experiment with faking. Rev. Czech. Med. pp. 20–31.

  • Freund, K., Watson, R., and Rienzo, D. (1988). Signs of feigning in the phallometric test. Behav. Res. Ther. 26: 105–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, J. A., and McNeil, B. J. (1983). A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 148: 839–843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, G. T., and Rice, M. E. (1996). The science in phallometric testing of male sexual interest. Curr. Direct. Psychol. Sci. 5: 156–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., Quinsey, V. L., Chaplin, T. C., and Earls, C. M. (1992). Maximizing the discriminant validity of phallometric assessment data. Psychol. Assess. 4: 502–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henson, D. E., and Rubin, H. B. (1971). Voluntary control of eroticism. J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 4: 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julien, E., and Over, R. (1988). Male sexual arousal across five modes of erotic stimulation. Arch. Sex. Behav. 17: 131–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalumiè re, M. L., and Earls, C. M. (1992). Voluntary control of penile responses as a function of stimulus duration and instructions. Behav. Assess. 14: 121–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalumiè re, M., and Harris, G. T. (1998). Common questions about phallometric assessment. Sex. Abuse 10: 227–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalumiè re, M. L., and Quinsey, V. L. (1993). The sensitivity of phallometric measures with rapists. Ann. Sex Res. 6: 123–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalumiè re, M. L., and Quinsey, V. L. (1994). The discriminability of rapists from non-sex offenders using phallometric measures: A meta-analysis. Crim. Justice Behav. 21: 150–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laws, D. R., and Rubin, H. B. (1969). Instructional control of an autonomic sexual response. J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 2: 93–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm, P. B., Davidson, P. R., and Marshall, W. L. (1985). Control of penile tumescence: The effects of arousal level and stimulus type. Behav. Res. Ther. 23: 273–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGraw, K. O., and Wong, S. P. (1992). A common language effect size statistic. Psychol. Bull. 111: 361–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proulx, J., Cô tè , G., and Achille, P. A. (1993). Prevention of voluntary control of penile response in homosexual pedophiles during phallometric testing. J. Sex Res. 30: 140–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinsey, V. L., and Bergersen, S. G. (1976). Instructional control of penile circumference. Behav. Ther. 7: 489–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinsey, V. L., and Carrigan, W. F. (1978). Penile responses to visual stimuli: Instructional control with and without auditory sexual fantasy correlates. Crim. Justice Behav. 5: 333–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinsey, V. L., and Chaplin, T. C. (1988). Preventing faking in phallometric assessments of sexual preference. In Prentky, R. A., and Quinsey, V. L. (eds.), Human Sexual Aggression: Current Perspectives, 528th ed., New York Academy of Sciences, New York, pp. 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinsey, V. L., Chaplin, T. C., and Varney, G. W. (1981). A comparison of rapists’ and non-sex offenders’ sexual preferences for mutually consenting sex, rape, and physical abuse of women. Behav. Assess. 3: 127–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice M. E., Chaplin, T. C., Harris, G. T., and Coutts, J. (1994). Empathy for the victim and sexual arousal among rapists and nonrapists. J. Interpers. Violence 9: 435–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, M. E., and Harris, G. T. (1995). Violent recidivism: Assessing predictive validity. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 63: 737–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, R. C., Shapiro, D., and Schwartz, G. E. (1975). Voluntary control of penile tumescence. Psychosom. Med. 37: 479–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, H. B., and Henson, D. E. (1975). Voluntary enhancement of penile erection. Bull. Psychonom. Soc. 6: 158–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D., and Over, R. (1987). Correlates of fantasy-induced and film-induced male sexual arousal. Arch. Sex. Behav. 16: 395–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wormith, J. S., Bradford, J. M.W., Pawlak, A., Borzecki, M., and Zohar, A. (1988). The assessment of deviant sexual arousal as a function of intelligence, instructional set and alcohol ingestion. Can. J. Psychiat. 33: 800–808.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wydra, A., Marshall, W. L., Earls, C.M., and Barbaree, H. E. (1983). Identification of cues and control of sexual arousal by rapists. Behav. Res. Ther. 21: 469–476.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harris, G.T., Rice, M.E., Chaplin, T.C. et al. Dissimulation in Phallometric Testing of Rapists' Sexual Preferences. Arch Sex Behav 28, 223–232 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018732225435

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018732225435

Navigation