Skip to main content
Log in

Erratum: The Political Economy of Inflation: Bargaining Structure or Central Bank Independence?

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The causes of inflation are commonly analyzed as the function of either the organization of wage bargaining or the independence of the central bank. Although these explanations are widely treated as competing, recent evidence suggests that there may be merit to both arguments. This paper presents a game-theoretic model of wage bargaining and monetary policy-making that shows why the two institutional causes are not only complementary, but elements of a more encompassing logic. The empirical superiority of this synthesizing model is demonstrated by reanalyzing data used in Al-Marhubi and Willett (1995) and by presenting new evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alesina, A. (1988). Macroeconomics and politics. In S. Fischer (Ed.), NBER Macroeconomics annual 1988. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberto, A., Cohen, G. and Roubini, N. (1992). Macroeconomic policy and elections in OECD democracies. Economics and Politics 4: 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A. and Summers, L. (1993). Bank independence and macroeconomic performance: Some comparative evidence. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 25: 151–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Marhubi, F. and Willett, T.D. (1995). The anti inflationary influence of corporatist structures and central bank independence: The importance of the hump shaped hypothesis. Public Choice 84: 153–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bade, R. and Parkin, M. (1982). Central bank laws and inflation – A comparative analysis. Mimeo. Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario (June).

  • Barro, R. and Gordon, D. (1983). Rules, discretion and reputation in a model of monetary policy. Journal of Monetary Economics 12: 101–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, N. and Katz, J. (1995). What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review 89: 634–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burdekin, R.C.K. and Willett, T.D. (1991). Central bank reform: The Federal Reserve in international perspective. Public Budgeting and Financial Management 3: 619–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calmfors, L. and Driffill, J. (1988). Centralization of wage bargaining. Economic Policy 6: 14–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, D. (1984). Social democracy, corporatism, labor quiescence, and the representation of economic interest in advanced capitalist society. In J. Goldthorpe (Ed.), Order and conflict in contemporary capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cukierman, A. and Meltzer, A.H. (1986). A theory of ambiguity, credibility and inflation under discretion and asymmetric information. Econometrica 54: 1099–1128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cukierman, A., Webb, S. and Neyapti, B. (1992).Measuring the independence of central banks and its effects on policy outcomes. The World Bank Economic Review 6: 353–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzese, R.J. (1994). Central bank independence, sectoral interests, and the wage bargain. Center for European Studies Working Paper Series #56.

  • Golden, M. and Wallerstein, M. (1995). Unions, employers, and collective bargaining: A report on data for 16 countries from 1950 to 1990. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.

  • Grilli, V., Masciandoro, D. and Tabellini, G. (1991). Political and monetary institutions and public financial policies in the industrialized countries. Economic Policy 13: 341–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P.A. (1994). Central bank independence and coordinated wage bargaining: Their interaction in Germany and Europe. German Politics and Society 29: 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havrilevski, T. and Granato, J. (1993). Determinants of inflationary performance: Corporatist structures vs. central bank autonomy. Public Choice 76: 249–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbs, D. and Locking, H. (1996). Wage compression, wage drift, and wage inflation in Sweden. Labour Economics 3: 109–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, T. (1996a). The real effects of money: An institutional model of the effects of wage bargaining and monetary policies on unemployment. Berkeley Center for German and European Studies Working Paper Series.

  • Iversen, T. (1996b). Power, flexibility and the breakdown of centralized wage bargaining: The cases of Denmark and Sweden in comparative perspective. Comparative Politics 28: 399–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, T. (1997). Wage bargaining, hard money, and economic performance: Theory and evidence for organized market economies. British Journal of Political Science, forthcoming.

  • Kydland, F. and Prescott, E. (1977). Rules rather than discretion: The inconsistency of optimal plans. Journal of Political Economy 85: 473–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layard, R., Nickell, S. and Jackman, R. (1991). Unemployment: Macroeconomic performance and the labour market. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowthorn, R. (1992). Corporatism and labour market performance. In J. Pekkarinen, M. Pohjola and B. Rowthorn (Eds.), Social corporatism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. (1991). Crisis and choice in European social democracy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirai, T. (1987). Japan. In J. Windmuller (Ed.), Collective bargaining in industrialized market economies: A reappraisal. Geneva: International Labour Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soskice, D. (1990). Wage determination: The changing role of institutions in advanced industrialized countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 6: 36–41.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Iversen, T. Erratum: The Political Economy of Inflation: Bargaining Structure or Central Bank Independence?. Public Choice 101, 285–306 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018730513366

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018730513366

Keywords

Navigation