Skip to main content
Log in

SELF-PERCEIVED GAINS IN CRITICAL THINKING AND COMMUNICATION SKILLS: ARE THERE DISCIPLINARY DIFFERENCES?

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The influence of disciplinary differences onself-perceived gains in critical thinking andcommunication skills were examined in terms of studentbackground characteristics, experiences in the major,and college experience variables. Academicdisciplines were categorized according to Biglan's(1973a) classification of single- and multiple-paradigmdisciplines. Although multigroup structural equationmodeling showed no differences between self-perceivedgains for single- and multiple-paradigm disciplines, theproposed theoretical model accounted for 13.5% and 25.3%of the variance in self-perceived gains in critical thinking and communication skills,respectively. The variable most highly associated withself-perceived gains was the quality of lower-divisioncourses in the major.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, G., Long, S. & Simpson, M.E. SELF-PERCEIVED GAINS IN CRITICAL THINKING AND COMMUNICATION SKILLS: ARE THERE DISCIPLINARY DIFFERENCES?. Research in Higher Education 40, 43–60 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018722327398

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018722327398

Keywords

Navigation