Abstract
State-of-the-science treatment of substanceabuse relies on decisional balance activities (weighingpros and cons of continued substance use) to enhancemotivation for change. Few data are available regarding the feasibility of these activities amongpersons dually diagnosed with schizophrenia andsubstance use disorder. To address this lacuna in theliterature, we completed focus groups with 21participants, all of whom had a schizophrenia-spectrumdiagnosis and lifetime substance abuse or dependence.These key informants discussed the pros and cons ofsubstance use as well as the pros and cons of quitting in response to a structured group interview.Our qualitative data indicate that persons living withschizophrenia can generate rich and diverse decisionalbalance information. We describe salient themes, contrast complementary perspectives (i.e., thepros of using and cons of quitting), and suggesttreatment implications based on thesefindings.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Carey, K.B. (1996). Substance use reduction in the context of outpatient psychiatric treatment: A collaborative, motivational, harm reduction approach. Community Mental Health Journal, 32, 291–306.
Carey, M.P., Maisto, S.A., Kalichman, S.C., Forsyth, A.D., Wright, E.M., & Johnson, B.T. (1997). Enhancing motivation to reduce the risk of HIV infection for economically disadvantaged urban women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 531–541.
Cunningham, J.A., Sobell, L.C., Gavin, D.R., Sobell, M.B., & Breslin, F.C. (1997). Assessing motivation for change: Preliminary development and evaluation of a scale measuring the costs and benefits of changing alcohol or drug use. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 11, 107–114.
Janis, I.L., & Mann, L. (1997). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice and commitment. New York: Free Press.
Miller, W.R., DiClemente, C.C., Rychtarik, R., & Zweben, A. (1992). Motivational enhancement therapy manual. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office.
Miller, W.R., & Rollnick, S. (1991).Motivational interviewing: Preparing people to change addictive behavior. New York: Guilford Press.
Morgan, D. L., & Krueger, R. A. (1998). The Focus Group Kit. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Prochaska, J.O., & DiClemente, C.C. (1984).The transtheoretical approach: Crossing the traditional boundaries of therapy. Homewood, IL: Dow-Jones/Irwin.
Prochaska, J.O., DiClemente, C.C., Velicer, W.F., Ginpil, S.E., & Norcross, J.C. (1985). Predicting change in smoking status for self-changers. Addictive Behaviors, 10, 395–406.
Prochaska, J.O., Velicer, W.F., Rossi, J.S., Goldstein, M.G., Marcus, B.H., Rakowski, W., Fiore, C., Harlow, L.L., Redding, C.A., Rosenbloom, D., & Rossi, S.R. (1994). Stages of change and decisional balance for 12 problem behaviors. Health Psychology, 13, 39–46.
Stasiewicz, P.R., Carey, K.B., Bradizza, C.M., & Maisto, S.A. (1996). Behavioral assessment of substance abuse with co-occurring psychiatric disorder. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 3, 91–105.
Smyth, N.J. (1996). Motivating clients with dual disorders: A stage approach. Families In Society, 77, 605–614.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458.
Velicer, W.F., DiClemente, C.C., Prochaska, J.O., & Brandenburg, N. (1985). Decisional balance measure for assessing and predicting smoking status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1279–1289.
Ziedonis, D.M., & Trudeau, K. (1997). Motivation to quit using substances among individuals with schizophrenia: Implications for a motivation-based treatment model. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 23, 229–238.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carey, K.B., Purnine, D.M., Maisto, S.A. et al. Decisional Balance Regarding Substance Use Among Persons with Schizophrenia. Community Ment Health J 35, 289–299 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018705722246
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018705722246