Abstract
In 1993 a new national form for governance was introduced in Swedish higher education. The new regime, best described in terms of deregulation and decentralisation, among other things, required a new individually based leadership at universities.
The paper describes the development of one particular 10-day interfaculty leadership training course for heads of departments, directors of study and other local managers, its content and methods and some implications for strategic management in higher education institutions.
Four such implications are covered: constructing a new social identity as leaders, getting leadership acceptance in an individualistic academic-freedom culture, training academic leaders in accordance with professional values, and dealing with accountability in a collegial decision-making environment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alvesson, M. & Björkman, I. (1992). Organisationsidentitet och organisationsbyggande. En studie av ett industriföretag. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Askling, B. (1994). Institutional Responses in Sweden. In D.F. Westerheijden, J. Brennan & P.A.M. Massen (eds.), Changing Contexts of Quality Assessment. Utrecht: Lemma, 149-162.
Bauer, M. (1994) Changing Quality Assessment in Sweden. In D.F. Westerheijden, J. Brennan & P.A.M. Massen (eds.), Changing Contexts of Quality Assessment. Utrecht: Lemma, 135-148.
Bauer, M. (1995). Demands on Quality in National Reform of Higher Education and Quality as viewed by University Teachers and Leadership. Paper presented at the 17th Annual EAIR Forum Dynamics in Higher Education: Traditions Challenged by New Paradigms, Zurich, 27-30 August 1995.
Bennich-Björkman, L. (1997). Organising Innovative Research: The Inner Life of University Departments. New York: Pergamon.
Cahill,W. (1995). How Leaders Can Lead, Tertiary Education and Management 1(1), 28-30.
Clark, B. (1998). The Entrepreneurial University: Demand and Response, Tertiary Education and Management 4(1), 5-16.
Czarniawska, B. & Joerges, B. (1996). Travel of ideas. In B. Czarniawska & Sevon G (eds.), Translating Organizational Change. Berlin: De Gruyter, 13-48.
Dearlove, J. (1995). Collegiality, Managerialism and Leadership in English Universities, Tertiary Education and Management 1(2), 161-169.
Dill, D. (1996). Academic Planning and Organizational Design: Lessons from Leading American Universities, Higher Education Quarterly 50(1), 35-53.
Dill, D. & Sporn, B. (1995). University 2001: WhatWill the University of the Twenty-first Century Look Like? In D. Dill & B. Sporn (eds.), Emerging Patterns of Social Demand and University Reform: Through a Glass Darkly. New York: Pergamon.
Eriksson, C. (1995). Föreställningar och Värderingar i en Organisation under Förändring.En Studie av Identitetsuppfattningar inom Konsumentkooperationen. Doctoral thesis No 58. Uppsala University, Sweden.
Erikson, E.H. (1980). Identity and Life Cycle. New York: Norton.
Fincher, C. (1998). Cooperative Strategies in Administrative Leadership, Tertiary Education and Management 4(1), 28-37.
Gulddahl Rasmussen, J. (1998). The Chief and the Ordinary Professor: Decentralized and Informal Relationships as Preconditions for Strategic Management in Universities, Tertiary Education and Management 4(1), 38-47.
Kerr, C. (1994). Troubled Times for American Higher Education: The 1990s and Beyond. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Liberg, A-M. (1998). The National Agency for Higher Education-a Presentation. Stockholm.
McNay, I. (1995). From the Collegial Academy to Corporate Enterprise: The Changing Cultures of Universities. In T. Schuller (ed.), The Changing University? Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
MacInnis, C., Powles, M. & Anwyl, J. (1994). Australian Academics' Perspectives on Quality and Accountability. Paper presented to the conference, Less administration more governance, European Association for Institutional Research, Amsterdam.
Morgan, G. (1986). Images of Organization. London: Sage.
National Agency for Higher Education (1998:26). Granskning och Bedömning av Kvalitetsarbetet vid Göteborgs Universitet. Stockholm.
Regeringsproposition (1993/94:177). Utbildning och Forskning: Kvalitet och Konkurrenskraft. Stockholm.
Røvik, K. A. (1998). The Translation of Popular Management Ideas: Towards a Theory. Paper presented at the 14th EGOS Colloquium in Maastricht, The Netherlands, 9-11 July 1998.
Sahlin-Andersson, K. (1996). The Construction of Organizational Fields. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevon (eds.), Translating Organizational Change. Berlin: De Gruyter, 69-92.
SOU (1996:21). Reform och Förändring.(RUT-93).Organisation och Verksamhet vid Universitet och Högskolor efter 1993 Års Universitets-och Högskolereform. Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartementet [SOU is a Swedish series of national official reports].
Tajfel, H. (1981). Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Trow, M. (1994). Academic Reviews and Culture of Excellence. Universitetskanslern Kanslersämbetet.Skriftserie 1994:1. Stockholm.
van Vugt, F.A. (1994). Policy Models and Policy Instruments in Higher Education: The Effects of Governmental Policy-making on the Innovative Behavior of Higher Education Institutions. In J.C. Smart (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol. X. New York: Agaton Press, 88-125.
Weick, K.E. (1979). The Social Psychology of Organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Norbäck, L.E., Nordberg, C. & Olsson, L.E. National Devolution in Swedish Higher Education -- A Quest for New Local Leadership. The Case of Leadership Development at Göteborg University. Tertiary Education and Management 5, 227–243 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018700921463
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018700921463