This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
REFERENCES
Bratman, M.E. (1994): 'Kagan on “The Appeal to Cost”', Ethics 104, 325-332.
Brink, D.O. (1986): 'Externalist Moral Realism', Southern Journal of Philosophy 24 (Supplement), 23-41.
Brink, D.O. (1989): Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hale, S. (1991): 'Against Supererogation', American Philosophical Quarterly 28, 272-285.
Kagan, S. (1989): The Limits of Morality, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Kagan, S. (1994): 'Defending Options', Ethics 104, 333-351.
Kamm, F.M. (1996): Morality, Mortality, Vol. II, New York: Oxford University Press.
Portmore, D.W. (1998): 'Can Consequentialism Be Reconciled with Our Common-senseMoral Intuitions', Philosophical Studies 91, 1-19.
Scheffler, S. (1982): The Rejection of Consequentialism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Slote, M. (1985): Common-senseMorality and Consequentialism, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Slote, M. (1993): 'Some Advantages of Virtue Ethics', in O. Flanagan and A.O. Rorty (eds.), Identity, Character, and Morality, pp. 429-448. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wolf, S. (1986): 'Above and Below the Line of Duty', Philosophical Topics 14, 131-148.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Portmore, D.W. Commonsense Morality and Not Being Required to Maximize the Overall Good. Philosophical Studies 100, 193–213 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018693319659
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018693319659