Landraces: A review of definitions and classifications

Abstract

The first reference to landraces as genetic resources dates from 1890. Some 20 years later the first definitions of a landrace were published. In the period 1909–1952 several definitions of the term landrace have been presented. No definitions were discovered in articles published in the period 1953–1974. The reason could be that after the Second World War attention of plant breeders and others was focussed on making instant progress. New definitions have been presented since 1974. Genetically related landraces form a landrace group. Synonyms of the term landrace and landrace group as cited in the literature are also given. The classification of types of landraces given by Mayr in 1934 had been discussed and an amended classification provided, paying attention to contamination caused by seed change. As a landrace has a complex and indefinable nature an all-embracing definition cannot be given. However, I suggest the following: an autochthonous landrace is a variety with a high capacity to tolerate biotic and abiotic stress, resulting in a high yield stability and an intermediate yield level under a low input agricultural system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Anderson, E. & H. Cutler, 1942. Races of Zea mays. I. Their recognition and classification. Ann Missouri Botanical Garden 21: 69-88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Astley, D., 1991. Exploration: methods and problems of exploration and field collecting, pp. 11-22. In: J.G. Hawkes (Ed.), 1991. Genetic conservation of world crop plants. Academic Press. 87 pp. Also issued as Biol Journal of Linnean Society 43, no. 1.

  3. Banga, O., 1944. Veredeling van tuinbouwgewassen. Zwolle. 211 pp.

  4. Baur, E., 1914. Die Bedeutung der primitive Kulturrassen und der wilden Verwandten unserer Kulturpflanzen für die Pflanzenzuchtung. Jahrb Deutschen Landwirtschafts-Gesellschaft 29: 104- 110.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bellon, M.R. & S.B. Brush, 1994. Keepers of maize in Chiapas, Mexico. Econ Bot 48: 196-209.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Berg, T., 1993. The science of plant breeding - support or alternative to traditional practices? pp. 72-77. In: W.K. de Boef & lK. Wellard (Eds.), Cultivating knowledge. Genetic diversity, farmer experimentation and crop research. London. 206 pp.

  7. Bisson, J., 1989. Les Messiles, groupe ampélographique du Bassin de la Loire. Connaissance de la Vigne et du Vin. J Intern Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin 23: 175-191, see Levadoux (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  8. de Blij, H.J., 1970. Wine, a geographic appreciation. Ottowa. 239 pp.

  9. Boursiquot, J.-M., 1990. Evolution de l'encépagemant du vignoble français au cours des trente dernières années. Progrès Agricole et Viticole 107: 15-20.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bowers, J.E., E.B. Bandman & C.P. Meredith, 1993. DNA fingerprint characterization of some wine grape cultivars. Amer J Enol Vitic 44: 266-274.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Brandolini, A., 1969. European races of maize. Procs 24th Corn & Sorghum Research Conf: 36-48.

  12. Brown, A.H.D., 1978. Isozymes, plant population genetics structure and genetic conservation. Theor Appl Genet 52: 145-157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Camussi, A., 1979. Numerical taxonomy of Italian populations of maize based on quantitative trait. Maydica 24: 161-174.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ceccarelli, S., 1994. Specific adaptation and breeding for marginal conditions, pp. 101-127. In: O.A. Rognli, E. Solberg & I. Schjelderup (Eds.), Breeding fodder crops for marginal conditions. Dordrecht. 329 pp.

  15. Christiansen-Weniger, F., 1931. Bericht über eine Studienreise durch das ostanatolische Hochland. Zeitschr Züchtung A Pflanzenzüchtung 18: 73-108.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cleveland, D.A., D. Soleri & S.E. Smith, 1994. Folk crop varieties: do they have a role in sustainable agriculture? BioScience 44: 740-751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dennis, J.V., 1987. Farmer management of rice variety diversity in northern Thailand. PhD dissertation. Cornell University, Michigan University Microfilms print, Ann Arbor 367 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ehdaie, B. & J.G. Waines, 1989. Adaptation of landrace and improved spring wheat genotypes to stress environments. J Genet Breed 43: 151-156.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Falcinelli, M., L. Russi, V. Negri & F. Veronesi, 1994. Variation within improved cultivars and landraces of lucerne in Central Italy, pp. 81-87. In: O.A. Rognli, E. Stolberg & I. Schjelderup (Eds.), Breeding fodder crops for marginal conditions. Dordrecht. 329 pp.

  20. Frankel, O.H. & M.E. Soulé, 1981. Conservation and evolution. Cambridge. 327 pp.

  21. Fruwirth, C., 1928. Zur Frage der Erhaltung unserer Landsorten. (On the question of maintenance of our landraces). Pflanzenbau 5: 157-158.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fruwirth, C., 1930. Allgemeine Züchtungslehre der landwirtschaftlichen Kulturpflanzen. Berlin. 478 pp.

  23. Fruwirth, C. & Th. Roemer, 1921. Einführung in die landwirtschaftlichen Pflanzenzüchtung. Berlin. 150 pp.

  24. Goodman, M.M. & W.L. Brown, 1988. Races of corn, pp. 39-79. In: G.F. Sprague & J.W. Dudley. Corn and corn improvement. Madison. 986 pp.

  25. Harlan, H.V. & M.L. Martini, 1936. Problems and results in barley breeding. USDA Yearbook of Agriculture-1936: 303-346.

  26. Harlan, J.R., 1951. Anatomy of gene centers. Amer Nat 85: 97-103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Harlan, J.R., 1975. Our vanishing genetic resources. Science 188: 618-621.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hawkes, J.G., 1983. The diversity of crop plants. Cambridge/ London. 184 pp.

  29. Hawkes, J.G., 1991. The importance of genetic resources in plant breeding, pp. 3-10. In: J.G. Hawkes (Ed.). Genetic conservation of world crop plants. Academic Press. 87 pp. Also issued as Biol Journal of Linnean Society 43, no. 1.

  30. Jacquemart, P., 1987. Les anciennes variétés fruitières en Wallonie. Brussel. 16 pp.

  31. Khairwal, I.S., C. Ram & A.K. Chhabra, 1990. Pearl millet. Manohar. 208 pp.

  32. Kiessling, H., 1912. Die züchterische Bearbeitung der Landsorten in Bayern. Beiträge zur Pflanzenzücht 2: 74-96.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kuckuck, H., 1939. Pflanzenzüchtung. Berlin. 125 pp.

  34. Kuckuck, H., 1952. Pflanzenzüchtung. Berlin. 132 pp.

  35. Kuckuck, H., G. Kobabe & G. Wenzel, 1991. Fundamentals of plant breeding. Springer Verlag. 236 pp.

  36. La Barre, W., 1974. Potato taxonomy among the Aymara indians of Bolivia. Acta Americana 5: 83-103.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lehmann, Ch.O., 1981. Collecting European land-races and development of European gene banks - historical remarks. Die Kulturpflanze 29: 29-40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lehmann, Ch.O., 1990. Hundert Jahre Sammlung und Nutzung von Landsorten, pp. 10-22. In: Gemeinsames Kolloquium: Sicherung und Nutzbarmachung pflanzengenetischer Ressourcen. Braunschweig/Gatersleben. 142 pp.

  39. Leng, E.R., A. Tavcar & V. Trifunovic, 1962. Maize of Southeastern Europa and its potential value in breeding programs elsewhere. Euphytica 11: 263-272.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lester, R.N. & E. Bekele, 1981. Amino acid composition of the cereal tef and related species of Eragrostis(Gramineae). Cereal Chem 58: 113-115.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Levadoux, L., 1948. Les cépages à raisins de cuve. Bull Off Int Vin 21 (203): 39-45, cited by Bisson, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Louette, D., A. Charrier & J. Berthaud, 1997. In situconservation of maize in Mexico: genetic diversity and maize seed management in a traditional community. Econ Bot 51: 20-38.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Mansholt, U.J., 1909. Van Pesch Plantenteelt, beknopte handleiding tot de kennis van den Nederlandschen landbouw. 3rd revised edition, pt 2. Plantenteelt. Zwolle. 228 pp.

  44. Marchenay, Ph., 1987. A la recherche des variétés locales de plantes cultivées. Paris. 211 pp.

  45. Martin, G. & M.W. Adams, 1987. Landraces of Phaseolus vulgarisin Northern Malawi. I. Regional variation. Econ Bot 41: 190- 203.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Mayr, E., 1934. Die Bedeutung der alpinen Getreidelandsorten für die Pflanzenzüchtung and Stammesforschung mit besonderer Beschreibung der Landsorten in Nordtirol und Vorarlberg. Zeitsch f Züchtung A: Pflanzenzüchtung 19: 195-228.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Mayr, E., 1935. Ueber wissenschaftliche und praktische Ergebnisse der alpinen Landsortenforschung. Forschung und Fortschritt 11: 376-378.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Mayr, E., 1937. Alpine Landsorten in ihrer Bedeutung für die praktische Züchtung. Forschungsdienst 4: 162-166.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Negrul, A.M., 1946. Evropyljsky i aziatsky vinograd Vitis viniferaL. Ampelografiya S.S.S.R., Moskoa 1: 63, cited by Bisson, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Nüesch, D., 1976. Untersuchungen und Beobachtungen an Hofsorten des Schweizer Mattenklee. Schweiz Landwirt Forschung 15: 401-410.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Oldfield, M.L. & J.B. Alcorn, 1987. Conservation of traditional agroecosystems.

  52. Percival, J., 1921. The wheat plant. A monograph. London. 473 pp.

  53. Prospéri, J.M., F. Demarquet, M. Angevain & P. Mansat, 1994. Evaluation agronomique de variétés de pays de sainfoin (Onobrychis sativaL.) originaires du sud-est de la France. Agronomie 14: 285-298.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Rieger, R., A. Michaelis & M.M. Green, 1991. Glossary of genetics. Classical and molecular. 5th edition. Springer-Verlag. 553.

  55. Rümker, K. von, 1908. Die systematische Einteilung und Benennung der Getreidesorten für praktische Zwecke. Jahrbuch der Deutschen landwirtschafts-Gesellschaft 23: 137-167.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Schindler, J., 1918. Einige Bemerkungen über die züchterische und wirtschaftliche Bedeutung der Landrassen unserer Kulturpflanzen. Deutsche Landwirt. Presse 45 (25): 155-156.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Sevilla, R., 1994. Variation in modern Andean maize and its implications for prehistoric patterns, pp. 219-244. In: S. Johannessen & Chr.A. Hastorf. 1994. Corn and culture in the prehistoric New World. Westview Press. 623 pp.

  58. Soleri, D. & S.E. Smith, 1995. Morphological and phenological comparisons of two Hopi maize varieties conserved in situand ex situ. Econ Bot 49: 56-77.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Teshome, A., B.R. Baum, L. Fahrig, J.K. Torrance, T.J. Arnason & J.D. Lambert, 1997. Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor(L.) Moench) landrace variation and classification in North Shewa and South Welo, Ethiopia. Euphytica 97: 255-263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Trehane, P., 1995. International Code of Nomenclature for Cultivated Plants. Wimborne. 174 pp.

  61. Tschermak, E., 1912. Zur Entstehung der Landsorten. Deutsche Landwirtschaftliche Presse 39 (40): 470.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Voss, J., 1992. Conserving and increasing on-farm genetic diversity: farmer management of varietal bean mixtures in Central Africa, pp. 34-51. In: J.L. Moock & R.E. Rhoades (Eds.), Diversity, farmer knowledge and sustainability. Cornell Univ Press. 278 pp.

  63. Worthington, C.B. (Ed.), 1975. The evolution of IBP-International Biological Programme. Cambridge Univ Press. 268 pp.

  64. Zeven, A.C., 1975. Domesticatie en evolutie van de kultuurplant. Wageningen Agricultural University, Dept of Plant Breeding. Mimeographed Lecture Notes. 177 pp.

  65. Zeven, A.C., 1979. Collecting genetic resources in highly industrialized Europe, especially the Netherlands, pp. 49-58. In: A.C. Zeven & A.M. van Harten (Eds.), Proc of the Conference Broadening the Genetic Base of Crops, Wageningen-1978. Wageningen. 347 pp.

  66. Zeven, A.C., 1986. Landrace groups of bread wheat (Triticum aestivumL. em. Thell.). Acta Hortic 182: 365-375.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Zeven, A.C., 1990. Landraces and improved cultivars of bread wheat and other wheat types grown in the Netherlands up to 1944. Wageningen Agricultural University Papers 90.2. Wageningen. 103 pp.

  68. Zeven, A.C., 1991. Four hundred years of cultivation of Dutch white clover landraces. Euphytica 54: 93-99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Zeven, A.C., 1996. Results of activities to maintain landraces and other material in some European countries in situbefore 1945 and what we may learn from them. Genet Res Crop Evol 43: 337-341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Zeven, A.C., 1997. The introduction of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgarisL.) intoWestern Europe and the phenotypic variation of dry beans collected in the Netherlands in dy1946. Euphytica 94: 319-328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Zeven, A.C., in preparation. The traditional 'irrational' change of seed and seed ware of landraces and cultivars: a review.

  72. Zeven, A.C. & R. Schachl, 1989. Groups of bread wheat landraces in Austrian alps. Euphytica 41: 235-246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zeven, A. Landraces: A review of definitions and classifications. Euphytica 104, 127–139 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018683119237

Download citation

  • landrace
  • garden-race
  • definition
  • classification
  • history