Archives of Sexual Behavior

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 15–29 | Cite as

Frequency and Timing of Coital Orgasm in Women Desirous of Becoming Pregnant

  • Devendra Singh
  • Walter Meyer
  • Robert J. Zambarano
  • David Farley Hurlbert
Article

Abstract

Generally, no functional role, except pleasure, is assigned to a women's coital orgasm. Recently, however, researchers have suggested that women can regulate the number of sperm accepted or rejected by manipulation coital orgasm timing. Baker and Bellis (1995) demonstrated that women retain more sperm if coital orgasm occurs after, rather than before male ejaculation. The present study investigated (i) factors associated with coital orgasm frequency and (ii) whether women desirous of becoming pregnant report more coital orgasms after than before their partners. Sixty-nine women rated their desire for pregnancy and answered questions about their sexual behaviors, coital orgasm frequency, and coital orgasm timing in relation to their partners. In regression analysis, coital orgasm frequency was predicted by foreplay duration, masturbation frequency, and active sexual participation; desire for pregnancy did not predict coital orgasm frequency. Desire for pregnancywas predicted byage (negatively), active sexual participation (positively), and positively by orgasm after partner ejaculation. Consistent with the Baker and Bellis hypothesis, frequency of orgasm after partner's orgasm remained a significant predictor for desire for pregnancy after controlling for degree of marital happiness, sexual foreplay duration, and coital orgasm frequency.

COITAL ORGASM EVOLUTIONARYPSYCHOLOGY THEORY ORGASMIC TIMING PREGNANCY SPERM COMPETITION 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Baker R. R. (1996). Sperm Wars: In fidelity Sexual Conflicts and Other Bedroom BattlesFourth Estate London.Google Scholar
  2. Baker R. R. and Bellis M. A. (1993). Human sperm competition: Ejaculate manipulation by females and a function for the female orgasm. Anim. Behav.6: 887–909.Google Scholar
  3. Baker R. R. and Bellis M. A. (1995). Human Sperm Competition Copulation Masturbation and InfidelityChapman & Hall London.Google Scholar
  4. Bentler P. M. and Peeler W. H (1979). Models of female orgasm. Arch. Sex. Behav.8: 405–423.Google Scholar
  5. Buss D. M. (1994). The Evolution of Desire. Strategies of Human MatingBasic Books New York.Google Scholar
  6. Buss D. M. and Schmitt D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychol. Rev.100: 204–232.Google Scholar
  7. Crooks R. and Bauer K. (1996). Our SexualityBrooks/Cole CA.Google Scholar
  8. Darling C. A. Davidson J. K. Sr. and Cox R. P. (1991). Female sexual response and the timing of partner orgasm. J. Sex Marital Ther.17: 3–21.Google Scholar
  9. Diamond J. (1992). The Third Chimpanzee. The Evolution and Future of the Human AnimalsHarper Perennial New York.Google Scholar
  10. Fisher S. (1973). The Female Orgasm. Psychology Physiology FantasyBasic Books New York.Google Scholar
  11. Fox C. A. Wolff H. S. and Baker J. A. (1970). Measurement of intra-vaginal and intra-uterine pressures during human coitus by ratio-telemetry. J. Reprod. Fertil.22: 243–251.Google Scholar
  12. Hurlbert D. F. (1993). A comparative study using orgasm consistency training in the treatment of women reporting hypoactive sexual desire. J. Sex Marital Ther.19: 41–55.Google Scholar
  13. Hurlbert D. F. Apt C. and Rabehl S. M. (1993). Key variables to understanding female sexual satisfaction: An examination of women in nondistressed marriages. J. Sex Marital Ther.19: 154–165.Google Scholar
  14. Hurlbert D. F. Apt C. and Rombough S. (1996). The female experience of sexual desire as a function of sexual compatibility in an intimate relationship. Can. J. Hum. Sex.5: 7–14.Google Scholar
  15. Hurlbert D. F. White C. L. Powell R. D. and Apt C. (1993). Orgasm consistency training in the treatment of women reporting hypoactive sexual desire: An outcome comparison of women-only groups and couple-only groups. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiat.24: 3–13.Google Scholar
  16. Hurlbert D. F. and Whittaker K. E. (1991). The role of masturbation in marital and sexual satisfaction. J. Sex Educ. Ther.17: 272–282.Google Scholar
  17. Margulis L. and Segan D. (1991). Mystery Dance: On the Evolution of Human SexualitySummit Books New York.Google Scholar
  18. Masters W. Johnson U. and Kolodny R. (1994). HeterosexualityHarper Collins New York.Google Scholar
  19. Morris D. (1967). The Naked ApeCape London.Google Scholar
  20. Norusis M. J. (1993). Base system user guide version 6 SPSS Inc. Chicago.Google Scholar
  21. Sherfey M. J. ( 1966 ). The evolution and nature of female sexuality in relation to psychoanalytic theory. J. Am. Psychoanal. Assoc.14: 28–128.Google Scholar
  22. Smith R. L. (1984). Human sperm competition. In Smith R. L. (ed.) Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating SystemsAcademic Press London pp. 601–660.Google Scholar
  23. Symons D. (1979). The Evolution of Human SexualityOxford University Press New York.Google Scholar
  24. Thornhill R. Gangestad S. W. and Comer R. (1995). Human female orgasm and mate fluctuating asymmetry. Anim. Behav.50: 1601–1615.Google Scholar
  25. Tooby J. and Cosmides L. (1992). Psychological foundations of culture In Barkow J. Cosmides L. and Tooby J. (eds.) The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of CultureOxford University Press New York pp. 19–136.Google Scholar
  26. Trudel G. Boulos L. and Matte B. (1993). Dyadic adjustment in couples with hypoactive sexual desire. J. Sex Educ. Ther.19: 31–36.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Devendra Singh
  • Walter Meyer
  • Robert J. Zambarano
  • David Farley Hurlbert

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations