Skip to main content
Log in

Catalysts for change: the emerging role of participatory research in land management

  • Published:
Environmentalist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Land management is a complex process which involves the interaction of biophysical and social variables. New demands are being placed on biophysical researchers working in land management to communicate more effectively with the public and to involve the public in the research process. The catalysts for change in the practice of land management research are clearly outlined with respect to pressures from new government policies, from institutions funding research, from communities in which the research is occurring and from within the academic environment itself. In order to meet these new demands, collaborative efforts – incorporating different academic disciplines and between researchers and communities – must occur. Traditional scientific approaches can benefit from the incorporation of techniques and approaches used within participatory research. The concept of participation and its relevance to biophysical research in land management is discussed, as well as the key characteristics of participatory research. Examples, predominantly from Australia, are provided; however the global scope of the changes is highlighted.

‘It is increasingly recognized that agriculture is a complex social process, not simply a complex, diverse and risky technical activity. This implies new theoretical as well as methodological challenges’..(present author's emphasis) (Scoones and Thompson, 1994, p. 5).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Argyris, C. (1980) Inner Contradictions of Rigorous Research. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, N. and Cary, J. (1992) Greening a Brown Land. Melbourne: MacMillan Education Australia.

  • Beer, T. and Ziolkowski, F. (1995) Environmental Risk As-sessment: an Australian Perspective. Canberra: AGPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Resource Sciences. (Undated) Guide and Instruc-tions for Applications. Canberra: Department of Primary Industries and Energy.

  • Campbell, A. (1994) Landcare: Communities Shaping The Land and The Future. St. Leonards, New South Wales: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (1990) Rapid and participatory appraisal. Approp. Technol. 16(4), 14–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (1992) Rural Appraisal: rapid, relaxed and participatory. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R., Pacey, A. and Thrupp, L. (eds) (1989) Farmer First: Farmer Innovation and Agricultural Research. London: Intermediate Technology Publications. UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. (1989) Soft systems methodology. Human Systems Manage. 8, 273–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinton, W. (1994) Science in the National Interest, Setting our National Goals. President's Statement, 3 August 1994.

  • Committee to Review the Contribution of Scientists and Engineers to the Public Understanding of Science, Engineering and Technology (1995) Review of the Contribution of Scientists and Engineers to the Public Understanding of Science, Engineering and Technology. London: Committee to Review the Contribution of Scientists and Engineers to the Public Understanding of Science, Engineering and Technology.

  • Commonwealth of Australia (1992a) Intergovernmental Agreement on the Environment. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia (1992b) National Strategy for Ecological Sustainable Development. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall, A., Guijt, I. and Welbourn, A. (1994) Acknow-ledging process: methodological challenges for agricul-tural research and extension. In Beyond farmer first: rural people's knowledge, agricultural research and extension practice (I. Scoones and J. Thompson, eds). pp. 98–117. London: Intermediate Technology Publications. UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovers, S. and Handmer, J. (1995) Ignorance, the precau-tionary principle, and sustainability. Ambio. 24, 92–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elders, M. and Chisholm, R. (1993) Emerging varieties of action research: introduction to the special issue. Human Relations. 46(2), 121–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, J. and Martin, A.M. (1988) Farmer participatory research: a review of concepts and recent fieldwork. Agricult. Admin. Extension 29, 247–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollings, C.S. (ed.) (1978) Adaptive Environmental Manage-ment and Assessment. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horlings, I. (1994) Policy conditions for sustainable agricul-ture in The Netherlands. The Environmentalist. 14(3), 193–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN/UNEP/WWF (1981) World Conservation Strategy. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN/UNEP/WWF.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN/UNEP/WWF (1991) Caring for the Earth: A Strategy for Sustainable Living. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN/UNEP/WWF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, M. (1993) The Earth's Summit's Agenda for Change. Geneva: Centre for Our Common Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen, M. and Mercer, D. (1993) Environmental planning at the local level: the example of local conservation strategies in Victoria, Australia. The Environmentalist 13(2), 83–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinhill Engineers Pty Ltd (1994) Public Participation in the Environmental Impact Assessment Process. Canberra: Commonwealth Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, G., Vanclay, F. and Furze, B. (eds) (1992) Agri-culture, Environment and Society: Contemporary Issues for Australia. South Melbourne: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1948) Action research and minority problems. In Resolving social conflicts (G.W. Lewin, ed.). pp. 201–16. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNi., J. (1988) Action Research: Principles and Practice. London: MacMillan Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P., Tarr, S. and Lockie, S. (1992) Participatory environmental management in New South Wales: policy and practice. In Agriculture, environment and society: contemporary issues for Australia (G. Lawrence, F. Vanclay and B. Furze, eds). pp. 184–207. South Melbourne: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, T., Nix, H. and Williams, J. (1995) Risk, uncertainty and cumulative change. Issues paper presented at the 1995 Fenner Conference on the Environment: Risk and Uncertainty in Environmental Management. pp. 33–43. Canberra, 13–16 November 1995.

  • Painter, M. (1992) Participation and power. In Citizen par-ticipation in government (M. Munro-Clark, ed.). pp. 21–36. Sydney: Hale and Iremonger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M. and Robinson, V. (1984) The origins and status of action research. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 20(2), 113–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1968) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretty, J.N. (1994) Alternative systems of inquiry for sustain-able agriculture. Inst. Develop. Studies Bull. 25, 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redclift, M. (1995) Global environmental change: the con-tribution of social science research to policy in the UK. The Environmentalist 15, 240–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richeleau, D. (1989) Agroforestry as Popular Science: A Land User Perspective for Research and Design in Rural Landscapes. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, San Francisco, 14–19 January 1989.

  • Richeleau, D. (1994) Participatory research and the race to save the planet: questions, critique, and lessons from the field. Agricult. Human Values 11(2–3), 4–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, H. and Brown, V. (1994) Options for public involve-ment in natural resource management: the conventional and creative. In International and national trends in public involvement: where to next for the water industry? (B.E. Nancarrow ed.). pp. 23–32. CSIRO Division of Water Resources.

  • Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (1995) Program Plans and Guidelines for Researchers 1996–97. Canberra: Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoones, I. and Thompson, J. (eds) (1994) Beyond Farmer First: Rural People's Knowledge, Agricultural research and Extension Practice. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. (1989) Management in Agriculture and Rural De-velopment. New York: Elsevier Applied Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Syme, G. (1992) When and where does participation count? InCitizen participation in government (M. Munro-Clark,ed.). Sydney: Hale and Iremonger.

  • Vanclay, F. (1992) The social context of farmers' adoption of environmentally sound farming practices. In Agricul-ture, environment and society: contemporary issues for Australia. pp. 94–121. South Melbourne: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vivian, J. (1995) Foundations for sustainable development: participation, empowerment and local resource management. In Grassroots environmental action: peo-ple's participation in sustainable development (D. Ghai and J. Vivian, eds) pp. 50–77. London: Routledge UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1996) The World Bank Participation Sourcebook. Washington: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W.F. (ed.) (1991) Participatory Action Research. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W.F. (1991b) Social Theory for Action. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keen, M. Catalysts for change: the emerging role of participatory research in land management. The Environmentalist 17, 87–96 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018591714764

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018591714764

Keywords

Navigation